WWE ends 2007 in style
For those who had better things to do on New Year’s Eve than watch Raw and forgot to record it, you missed a good show. It was highlighted by a standout performance by Ric Flair in what is likely his final match at the Greensboro Coliseum, a venue he is synonymous with.
Flair’s win-or-retire match against his friend Triple H was set up well. First, Vince McMahon added the stipulation that if Triple H loses in any manner, he cannot compete in the Royal Rumble match. That gave Triple H a reason not to lose on purpose to prevent Flair from having to retire. Then, Flair and Triple H had a great segment in the locker room in which they discussed the ramifications their match would have on their friendship and their careers.
The basic, logical approach to storytelling was very effective in making the fans care about the match, as each man’s incentive for wanting to win was crystal clear.
As for the match, Flair at 58 obviously isn’t what he once was, but he showed that he still has the ability to rise to the occasion. He and Triple H took fans on the proverbial rollercoaster ride, successfully getting the crowd to suspend disbelief and buy into the fact that Flair could hold his own and possibly defeat a wrestler who is 20 years younger and significantly bigger and stronger.
To me, the finish – in which William Regal came to ringside and hit Flair with brass knuckles, causing Triple H to get disqualified – did not take anything away from the match, although I have seen people complaining about it on various wrestling Web sites. Honestly, I was expecting some kind of outside interference. What else could they have done for a finish? For the angle to continue, Flair couldn’t lose, and there’s no way Triple H should be losing clean at this point. It had to be a DQ or a countout.
From a story line standpoint, Regal’s actions made sense based on what had happened earlier in the show. Regal had disobeyed McMahon’s orders to assault Hornswoggle with brass knuckles, and this was Regal’s way of trying to get back in the good graces of the boss.
This sets up a likely feud between Regal and Triple H, who will seemingly play the role of the anti-hero who has to overcome the odds against a corrupt authority figure. Triple H’s loss to Jeff Hardy at Armageddon cost him a WWE title shot, and now he has lost another opportunity at a title shot by being denied entrance into the Royal Rumble.
The way things are shaping up, I expect The Undertaker to win the Royal Rumble match and challenge Edge for the world heavyweight title at WrestleMania, and for Triple H to win the elimination chamber match that is reportedly taking place at the No Way Out pay-per-view next month, setting up a Triple H-Randy Orton WWE title match at WrestleMania. I’m still not quite sure how Batista fits into WrestleMania.
Other thoughts on last night’s show:
Triple H definitely brought his ‘A’ game, both on the microphone and in the ring, for his angle with Flair. I did have a slight problem with Jim Ross’ commentary during the match, however. Ross referred to the contest as the greatest wrestler from a previous era facing the best wrestler in the business today. Shouldn’t Randy Orton and Edge, the two world champions, be considered the best? And didn’t Triple H just lose a high-profile match to Hardy? If Triple H is the best regardless of wins and losses and titles, then why should fans care about his quest for the championship? …
As good as the Flair-Triple H match was, the Shawn Michaels-Mr. Kennedy bout was even better. In fact, Michaels and Kennedy might have topped their match at Armageddon. I was definitely surprised to see Kennedy score the clean pin, however. I might be in the minority on this, but I just don’t see Kennedy at that level, at least not yet. Kennedy cuts good promos and he’s become a solid worker, but there’s just something missing for me as far as him being among the elite superstars. …
It was nice to see Matt Hardy back on camera. It was his first televised appearance since undergoing emergency appendectomy surgery in November. While Orton’s attack on him might have been a little predictable, it still was effective in adding some intensity to the Orton-Jeff Hardy feud. …
After acting like he was having a nervous breakdown last week, McMahon seemed more composed. I’m not sure what to make of that. …
JBL and Chris Jericho both showed a lot of fire during their pull-apart brawl. The blood on the bridge of JBL’s nose, while probably not planned, was a nice touch.







Comments
Raw was okay but it could have been better if they would have just had a clean finish (for once) on their main event match instead of their typical DQ finish which seems to be the weekly trend.
It's so lame that every week someone in the main event is getting DQ'd and to make matters worse, they expect people to spend almost $50 on a PPV (that you pay for to see a winner and a loser) where they have DQs in major title matches as well.
I don't know what's worse taking a Special Teams hit from Darrell Reid or listening to a Jeff Hardy promo. And after I woke up from the Jeff Hardy/Orton promo, I was shocked that they had Michaels put Kennedy over cleanly, that's something I'd rather watch.
It's really disappointing when I look more forward to seeing a TNA PPV and not even thinking twice about ordering a WWE PPV anymore. The quality of their PPV matches is worth every penny just as long as Nash and Hall aren't in it.
Posted by: Steve | January 1, 2008 6:55 PM
I agree with you, the way they finished the Flair match makes sense. This most likely sets up another Flair match for next week against Regal with the Raw roulette. HHH will probably still get into the Rumble somehow. From popular opinion online, people don't think Orton will have the WWE belt come Wrestlemania. Should be interesting!
Posted by: WWE Characters | January 2, 2008 12:56 AM
Kevin,
What are some of the wrestling websites that you go to? It seems that many have spyware, adware, too many pop-ups etc. That's why I like to read ring posts.
Sean
Posted by: Sean | January 2, 2008 10:15 AM
Thats a joke that anyone would think a TNA ppv is better then a WWE ppv.
Who doesn't like a 18 man extreme reverse cage gauntlet fight for the right to get a briefcase match?
Posted by: John | January 2, 2008 4:39 PM
You are right about Mr. Kennedy cleanly pinning Shawn Michaels. I thought Mr. Kennedy would win by using a low blow or something. Like you, I don't believe Mr. Kennedy is at that level yet. He is near it though. As for ordering a WWE pay-per-view, it's been 5 years since I last ordered a WWE pay-per-view which tells you a lot about the quality of the show.
Posted by: Will | January 3, 2008 10:28 AM
I was at the Raw in Philadelphia back in October, and even though he's a heel, Mr. Kennedy had that same buzz from the crowd that Austin had 10 years ago. They need some solid heels on RAW. Orton has no personality, Umaga is stale, JBL is 5 years ago and Carlito is being held back in a tag team angle. Besides, HBK will probably go over on Kennedy next week in the Roullete gimmick.
As far as the Flair/HHH "screwjob", it isn't believable that Flair would cleanly pin HHH and Flair isn't retiring yet, so what else could they do? It wasn't a ppv match. They are just building toward the Wrestlemania climax.
Posted by: Chris | January 4, 2008 12:11 AM
The last PPV I really enjoyed since the beginning until the end was backlash '07, I think. The last months where full of DQ and characters that really needed I break because they were overexposed.
Despite the low quality of TV shows and PPV of the last year, I think things are moving in the right way. I really enjoy watching Hardy as a main eventer.
I like Flair/HHH finish but after the big DQ streak of the last couple of months, some could find the match a bit disappointing.
Posted by: Gaston | January 4, 2008 1:31 AM
Sean: Not that you asked me, but angrymarks.com is a good site that won't kill you with pop-ups. wrestlecrap.com is another good one, if you need a laugh.
Kevin: Thanks for the great blog! I check this one out daily.
Posted by: BaltoJim | January 4, 2008 4:22 PM