baltimoresun.com

« Does Raw really need saving? | Main | A different kind of Cage match »

October 15, 2007

TNA respects its elders too much

I didn’t order TNA’s Bound for Glory pay-per-view last night, but it sounds like it was a good show judging by the reports that I have read. Looking at the big picture, however, I think TNA is its own worst enemy.

I don’t understand why a company that has a roster filled with talented wrestlers in their 20s and 30s would put its world title on 48-year-old Sting, and plan a major push for another 48-year-old in Kevin Nash.

Don’t get me wrong. I respect Sting – who defeated Kurt Angle for the TNA title last night – and I still think he has a lot of value. He works hard in the ring and deserves to have a prominent role. But not as the world champion. For TNA to have any chance at competing with WWE, it needs to brand itself as the cutting edge, up-and-coming company. Sting as world champion will have the exact opposite effect.

The good news is that Sting probably won’t be champion for long. With Vince Russo on the creative team, it’s apparent that no one will hold the title for more than a few months at a time.

Even more perplexing than Sting’s win over Angle is the decision to have Nash get back in the ring for a high-profile program, which looks to be the case based on last night’s show. Sting, at least, has a good work ethic and can still go in the ring. Nash, on the other hand, is infamous for being lazy and manipulative, and his knees are in bad shape.

It’s not as if Sting and Nash have a track record for being huge draws, either. While they were big stars in their day, neither of them drew money when they were put in the top position.

Furthermore, by having Sting as world champion, Nash in a major storyline, the Steiners and Jeff Jarrett as featured performers, Russo on the creative team and Jeremy Borash and Mike Tenay as on-air talent, TNA looks a lot like WCW when the company was on its last legs. What’s next, a Nitro Girls reunion in TNA?

The other thing that bothered me about the pay-per-view pertains to Adam “Pacman” Jones. First, TNA promoted that Jones was going to wrestle on the show, knowing full well that his agreement with the Tennessee Titans restricts him from doing so. Unlike previous tag-team matches in which Jones was technically part of the match (although he was not allowed to make physical contact), last night he had a debuting wrestler substitute for him.

Then, in a truly distasteful act, TNA had Jones throw dollar bills in the ring as a distraction, and referee Earl Hebner picked them up “like a dancer in a strip club,” in the words of Tenay. This, of course, was playing off the incident in which Jones threw cash from a plastic trash bag on stage at a Las Vegas strip club to “make it rain” for dancers. A melee ensued and shots were fired, leaving Thomas Urbanski, a bouncer at the club and a former pro wrestler, paralyzed from the waist down.

It’s disgraceful for TNA to make light of such a serious incident, and Jones is beyond clueless if this is his idea of rehabilitating his image.

Posted by Kevin Eck at 2:22 AM | | Comments (2)
        

Comments

The only thing wrong with the PPV was the younger guys trying to do 100 moves in their matches. Jeff Jarrett has not been seen on TNA programming for several months due to the passing of his wife. And the Make It Rain bit was pretty funny since it parodied the situation that landed Pacman Jones in TNA

With all companies trying to establish themselves, you must first set roots for yourself. By bringing in high profile established talent like Sting, the Steiners, Nash, etc...they are providing a base to build upon.

You could have the greatest talent in the world, but if a person does not know them from Adam, why bother tuning in? Your talent is then wasted. Sting having the belt is a quick and solid way to provide the spark they need in order to support there new 2 hour format. He may not have the belt long, but does he really need to? People will tune in to see a champion that they know and respect, which breeds word of mouth and excitement. It's simple marketing.

Your statement that putting the belt on an older talent is going the wrong direction really does not hold water. You can't tell me that if the Undertaker or HBK ever went to TNA and was made champ that would be a mistake or going backwards?

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "a" in the field below:
About Kevin Eck
The Baltimore Sun's Kevin Eck blogs about professional wrestling. Listen to Eck Wednesdays at 3 p.m. on WNST 1570 AM.
E-mail Kevin.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Blog updates
Recent updates to baltimoresun.com sports blogs  Subscribe to this feed
Charm City Current
Stay connected