Who is the Orioles' first-half MVP?

You have to love when we have a negative topic in the bar. It just makes the beer taste that much colder (to paraphrase a legend).
Quick aside: One of my favorite watering holes, an Irish bar at that, unexpectedly closed yesterday. I’m distraught, so I’m selling 2-for-1 Smithwicks today.
At this bar, we are in the middle of our Orioles season review, and we’ve already looked at best and worst – and many of you picked out specific moments or areas of play.
Today we are simply about the player (sorry if this is redundant for some of you, but I have no problem hearing your opinion more than once. Remember, I get paid to sit next to Peter Schmuck).
We’ll get to disasters tomorrow. This one is reserved for the best.
Who is the Orioles’ first-half MVP?
If you remember (and if you don’t, you might want to skip the sauce for a day), I said Monday that I thought rookie Brad Bergesen was the club’s brightest spot. But that doesn’t mean he is my Most Valuable Oriole.
Bergesen wasn’t expected to come up and pitch as well as he did. And so he gets my brightest light award.
But I don’t think a MVO should go to someone who plays every five days unless that guy completely dominates. In that spirit, I’m also not giving it to relievers George Sherrill or Jim Johnson despite how well they have pitched.
No, for me, the Orioles’ first-half MVP should go to either Adam Jones or Luke Scott.
Scott has better power numbers and has proven he deserves to be in the lineup every day. A wonderful year for him so far. Yet, I am going with Jones, even though he has struggled the past month.
Because even when Jones is slumping at the plate, he takes away runs with his center-field play. Yes, his tendency to play so shallow can be aggravating, but he usually gets to everything he should. And he makes plays that very few can.
So Jones, the Orioles’ lone all-star, is my MVO. What do you think?
Daily Think Special: Who is the Orioles’ first-half MVP?







Comments
bergy
Posted by: Luke | July 14, 2009 8:57 PM
2 for 1 smithwick's? Gimme 2 which is really 4, right?
The MVO is LUUUUUUUUKE Scott. He's on pace for 30+ HR's. That's MVO stats. He also has a great attitude and seems content with his role as DH/OF.
The funny thing is....he might be gone come 7/31/09.
Posted by: Rob K. | July 14, 2009 9:11 PM
1) Jones
2) Sherrill
3) Scott
4) Bergesen
5) Johnson
Posted by: Jon | July 14, 2009 10:23 PM
Clearly Like Scott
Posted by: EC | July 14, 2009 10:38 PM
Luke Scott.
Posted by: Captive Fan | July 14, 2009 11:52 PM
Dave Trembley.
Here's why.
O's are 8 games under .500 in tough AL East with the following having occurred:
1. 4/5 of the Opening Day starting rotation gone.
2. Two rookies playing everyday.
3. Look at the batting averages - not much to brag about there - although to Crow's credit, this teams scores runs.
3. Little production from Melvin (although he was fantastic in the 2nd half of last season.
4. Starting SS goes down for an extended time.
5. Two rookies in starting rotation.
I love to see what Leyland, Torre, or LaRussa could do with what Dave has has to deal with.
For a player, this is an easy one: Bergeson.
Posted by: John in Conn | July 15, 2009 12:47 AM
LUKE SXOTT, 1ST IN HR, 1ST IN BA IST IN SLG%
Posted by: Bob Pfister | July 15, 2009 1:31 AM
bergesen!!! do you get excited to watch every game (which jones usually plays in) or when an oriole pitcher has a chance to win? i feel much more comfortable when bergy is pitching than with any oriole pitcher since........yeah i got nothing. he's still a huge plus
Posted by: justin | July 15, 2009 4:28 AM
I think it would be interesting if you broke this question up....into say, 1. most valuable defense; 2. most valuable offense; 3. impact. etc.
As far as defense: I'd go Cakes\ Jones (the 2 of them are 1 and 1.5), Itzuris, Andino
Offense: Scott, Jones, Cakes
Impact: Andino; I hated this trade when it went down, I admit now that I was wrong. His defense has been stellar (and if he played everyday, you think he'd have a better glove than Itzuris?)
Posted by: Ryan | July 15, 2009 6:14 AM
Easily Scott.
Posted by: terpfan | July 15, 2009 7:26 AM
Bergesen saved the pitching staff. He's the man.
Posted by: Butch Kelly | July 15, 2009 7:30 AM
Here in beautiful Piittsburgh, our Mayor is 27 year old Luke Ravenstahl. His campaign slogan is "I Like Luke." I'll take that for Oriole MVP too, Luke Scott, with Adam Jones, and his All Star Game GWRBI, a very close second.
Posted by: The Big E- | July 15, 2009 7:37 AM
1) Scott
2) Jones
3) Sherrill
4) Bergesen
5) Johnson
Posted by: Leo Mangini | July 15, 2009 7:59 AM
Dan Connolly.
Posted by: bryanintimonium | July 15, 2009 8:21 AM
Luke Scott, no doubt about it. He has been the most consistent hitter all year. Lefties, Righties, it doesn't matter. His hot streaks are getting more and more impressive as well, hitting home runs in bunches at times.
If they trade him or not resign him, I will lose a lot of respect for Andy McPhail and this teams upper management.
Posted by: O's Fan in The Bronx | July 15, 2009 8:25 AM
It's A. Jones without a doubt. Yes Luke has a good stick, but he can't come close to being a all around athletic player as Jones is becoming.
Posted by: DXMAN | July 15, 2009 8:37 AM
No one. No one is valuable if you are a losing team.
Posted by: Paulie G | July 15, 2009 8:50 AM
It's hard to go against Adam for his overall impact on the game - plus the fact that he seems to be the focal point of much of the talk about "the future." But I also think Reimhold deserves some attention too.
Posted by: Old Bird Fan Mike | July 15, 2009 9:00 AM
I love when people say stuff like "clearly" or "obviously", like no other opinion but theirs makes sense...
In order, my choices are:
1)Sherrill
2)Scott
3)Jones
4)Bergeson
5)Johnson
Posted by: Keith | July 15, 2009 9:12 AM
It's a close call with Jones and Scott, but since Jones made it to the Allstar Game and Scott didn't, Jones is my man.
Posted by: Tim Wenger | July 15, 2009 9:14 AM
MVP Arm: Bergy
MVP Bat: Scott
I'd give the nod to Bergesen, just because he's been the most consistent of anyone. Scott is streaky, we know it, he knows it, the fantasy world knows it. Brad Bergesen has been a pleasant surprise to the O's rotation, I think he's thrown 7+INN in each of his last 7 starts... ridiculous. Couple of 8INN games and a complete games are in there also.
Posted by: RJ | July 15, 2009 9:29 AM
Easily Bergesen. Pitching is what will ultimately turn this team into a winner (or not), so having a guy who goes out there every 5th day and pitches deep into games, giving his team a chance to WIN, is more valuable than any gaudy batting stats.
Also, let's just stick to sports talk here, okay? The bar analogy was amusing initially, but has gotten old pretty quick.
Posted by: SM | July 15, 2009 9:47 AM
Adam Jones.
Posted by: emjay | July 15, 2009 10:13 AM
I've got to go with Luke Scott.
Posted by: Jeff | July 15, 2009 10:21 AM
i'd vote for bergesen. his success has helped to keep the orioles from making any panic moves with the minor league pitchers, lent stability to the rotation, and helped to keep the bullpen from being so overworked. i also think that i detect that this ballclub plays with a little more focus when he pitches. that may be because he pitches quickly, or, because the club has confidence that he will keep them in the game.
his effect on the club reaches beyond his numbers every fifth day.
Posted by: bellevue bob | July 15, 2009 10:28 AM
George Sherrill. He's saved half the team's wins. Lesser relievers would have lost half of his saves. He's only got one loss and two other blown saves. And his saves aren't with multiple-run leads against last-place teams. I doubt that many other relivers -any?- have a record so superior to their teams overall mark. MVP is not about best individual performance but most value to the team's record.
Posted by: maumau | July 15, 2009 11:19 AM
Luke Scott is your MVP
WHEN are y'all going to appreciate what this guy DOES for the O's???
Scott SHOULD have been at the AS game along with Jones
He SHOULD have been in the HR Derby ... it might have been worth watching
Mauer & Inge in it ? what a joke that was
Posted by: TxOFan | July 15, 2009 11:40 AM
To anyone who says Jones or Sherril.
Opinions vary but the facts are:
Jones 12HR 47RBI 23BB
357OB .481SLG .303AVG
Scott 18HR 51RBI 29BB
384OB .592SLG .305AVG
Scott has better numbers than Jones in every catagory and has 87 less at bats!!!
As for Sherrill, saves are the most over-rated stat in baseball.
From http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=caple/080805...
Well, that's precisely the problem: the very name. "Save" is as misleading a term as "reality television." Closers don't really "save" many games these days, nor is the game really on the line most of the time. Closers merely conclude what is usually a foregone conclusion. By the time the music starts and they charge to the mound to protect a three-run lead, the victory is already all but assured.
Posted by: GregB | July 15, 2009 11:42 AM
1) Jones
2) Scott
3) Bergesen
4)Sherrill
5) Johnson
Posted by: JoJoTheWhale | July 15, 2009 12:03 PM
My first half MVP is Andy McPhail. MVP to me is most valuable person. He has signed our #1 pick quickly again this year and has sprinkled in the young guys over the course of the season very well. With more guys coming. Without him I'm not sure where we'd be. Go O's
Posted by: Walt | July 15, 2009 12:20 PM
This is one of those questions that while everyone is entitled to their own opinion, there does actually happen to be a right answer and a bunch of wrong ones.
By any definition, Luke Scott is the MVO. No he's not their best player, but he's certainly having the best season. Jones is the only other one in the discussion thanks to his defense, but his OPS is a whopping 138 points lower than Luke's. Luke has also been very consistent, as his little post DL hot streak has managed to continue on even if he's not hitting five homers every series.
Luke leads the team in OBP, SLG, AVG, HRs, and RBIs. Again, this is not a debate.
Bergesen has been fantastic, but come on people. He's played in 16 games. You can't be MVP of a team while playing in less than 20 percent of the team's games. Especially when you have a 3.54 ERA. Again, he's a great story and has bailed out the rotation, but come on. I don't want to even get into Sherrill...let's just suffice it to say that playing 37 of roughly 800 possible innings means you don't get to be MVO, even if he's having a great year.
Finally, am I the only one who's not gaga over Andino? What the hell is everybody here smoking? The dude has a .260 OBP. Do you realize how atrocious that is? I don't care if he's got Ozzie Smith's feet, Willie Mays's range and Robert Clemente's arm, no defense can make up for a sub .550 OPS. He let us keep our heads above water when Izturis went down, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here. The guy is a borderline utility man at best, nice story or not. Sure he's had a bigger impact than Hayden Penn would have, but that's like saying Rosie O'Donnel is hot just because she's more attractive than Margaret Thatcher. Give me a break (and a future SS preferably).
Posted by: Ben | July 15, 2009 12:24 PM
Plays shallow. For those of us who have enjoyed the great and the bad of the Orioles over the years, Paul Blair was the quintessential center fielder, and he played very shallow, and got to everything that he needed to. A center fielder playing shallow in Baltimore is a great thing.
Posted by: Bruce | July 15, 2009 12:52 PM
This is one of those questions that while everyone is entitled to their own opinion, there does actually happen to be a right answer and a bunch of wrong ones.
By any definition, Luke Scott is the MVO. No he's not their best player, but he's certainly having the best season. Jones is the only other one in the discussion thanks to his defense, but his OPS is a whopping 138 points lower than Luke's. Luke has also been very consistent, as his little post DL hot streak has managed to continue on even if he's not hitting five homers every series.
Luke leads the team in OBP, SLG, AVG, HRs, and RBIs. Again, this is not a debate.
Bergesen has been fantastic, but come on people. He's played in 16 games. You can't be MVP of a team while playing in less than 20 percent of the team's games. Especially when you have a 3.54 ERA. Again, he's a great story and has bailed out the rotation, but come on. I don't want to even get into Sherrill...let's just suffice it to say that playing 37 of roughly 800 possible innings means you don't get to be MVO, even if he's having a great year.
Finally, am I the only one who's not gaga over Andino? What the hell is everybody here smoking? The dude has a .260 OBP. Do you realize how atrocious that is? I don't care if he's got Ozzie Smith's feet, Willie Mays's range and Robert Clemente's arm, no defense can make up for a sub .550 OPS. He let us keep our heads above water when Izturis went down, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here. The guy is a borderline utility man at best, nice story or not. Sure he's had a bigger impact than Hayden Penn would have, but that's like saying Rosie O'Donnel is hot just because she's more attractive than Margaret Thatcher. Give me a break (and a future SS preferably).
Posted by: Ben | July 15, 2009 12:57 PM
Most Valuable player: Jones
Most Valuable Oriole: Andy MacPhail. Without all the trades he's made and the players he's helped draft, we wouldn't have any Oriole playersreally worth getting excited about every day.
Posted by: Bruce | July 15, 2009 1:11 PM
Dan, I'm going to agree with you and for the reasons you gave, adding that for Jonesy gets extra credit for representing the team so well at the All-Star Game.
That said, if Luke has a huge second half, I can see him being the year's MVO despite limited play in the field. Obviously, a DH needs to do a little extra to earn such honors, but the lack of a position in the field should preclude him from winning.
Old Smithwicks is a venerable brew to be sure, but tell me, lad, mightn't you have a few pints of Turner's Sticklebract Bitter squirreled away anywhere?
Posted by: Ken Francis | July 15, 2009 1:17 PM
Dan, I'll take the same setup as Rob, but I want mine one at a time to keep them cold. Don't worry, I'll have them all finished before the lunch hour is up. Just don't look too closely at my typing this afternoon.
A number of good options available, as others have pointed out, though Scott, Jones, and Bergesen are justifiably getting the most attention. My initial thinking was between Jones and Scott, but the more I think about it the more I realize how critical Bergesen has been to the success of the Orioles this year, such as it is. He has really turned into a stopper, and even when he does not win he gives the team a chance. That has to be psychologically huge and carry over to the rest of the team.
Jones and Scott are also tough to choose between, but AJ gets the edge because A) he's played in more games (80 vs 66), and B) he's made some outstanding defensive plays to go along with his offense. Though you could have easily made the argument for Scott as the Orioles' All-Star representative based on his offensive statistics alone.
So my final ballot looks like this:
1. Bergesen
2. Jones
3. Scott
4. Markakis
5. Reimold
Posted by: CSB Jack | July 15, 2009 1:27 PM
The Oriole Bird!
Posted by: cb coach | July 15, 2009 1:47 PM
Bruce-
"Plays shallow. For those of us who have enjoyed the great and the bad of the Orioles over the years, Paul Blair was the quintessential center fielder, and he played very shallow, and got to everything that he needed to. A center fielder playing shallow in Baltimore is a great thing."
When Jones gets to everything that he needs to, let me know.
Posted by: EC | July 15, 2009 2:30 PM
Felix Pie
Posted by: ryan | July 15, 2009 2:51 PM
Bergesen, no contest.
Posted by: nosferatu | July 15, 2009 3:23 PM
Ben,
I gotta differ w/you about Rosie O'Donnell being hotter that Margaret Thatcher. Even though she's a lot older, at least Margaret doesn't get mistaken for a beached sea cow.
B/t/w, Luke is definitely da man so far this year. He (and sometime Reimold) was the only one who kept hitting when everyone else, including Jones, was in the toilet with a team wide slump.
Posted by: cliff | July 15, 2009 3:23 PM
Most Valuable Oriole:
Brad Bergesen - Yes, he only pitches every 5 games, but the break that he gives the bullpen in those games helps the O's in the game or two that follows. Plus, he works quick, so the team gets a break by not being stuck out in the field as long during his games.
Runners up:
Luke Scott: He's been the only consistent (ly good) batter in the lineup for the past couple of weeks now. Yeah, he's streaky, but the streaks have come this year when the O's needed him the most.
Robert Andino: He's no offensive threat, but his defense has been excellent while filling in for Izturis. Just remember the revolving door at shortstop last season and realize that the O's could be even worse off now.
Nolan Reimold: If only for the fact that he ended the "Pie as the starting left fielder" experiment, in addition to proving quickly that he belongs in the bigs.
Honorable Mention: (Believe it or not!)
Dannys Baez: He's been lights out way more often than he's been blown up.
Posted by: BaltoJim | July 15, 2009 3:42 PM
1) MacPhail
2) Jones
3) Scott
4) Bergesen
5)Sherrill
Posted by: Tom Hedrick | July 15, 2009 4:16 PM
Robert Andino: He keep the infield intact and supplied timely hitting.
Posted by: Jim Sullivan | July 15, 2009 5:59 PM
i have to go with Reimold and Bergesen because they gave life to a club that had been lifeless before their coming on board.
Posted by: nic | July 15, 2009 6:30 PM
I was thinking the same thing Bruce said. Playing shallow reminds me of Paul Blair. He was so much fun to watch. Jones hits better. He plays center field well. Hopefully he'll develop into as good a centerfielder as Blair was.
Posted by: John Hanson | July 15, 2009 9:01 PM
Who is Cakes? I though that was Palmer!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 15, 2009 9:52 PM
O's MVP's so far
Eaton
Pie
Ray
Simon
Montanez
Posted by: Mike | July 15, 2009 10:03 PM
Mike - I see your sarcasam but Montanez was actually pretty good before he got hurt. Put Hill in the #5 spot.
Posted by: Mike | July 16, 2009 7:08 AM
sick of talking negatives about O's...focus on the POSITIVES...Mora, Ray, easy targets, but they are ours, they care. Move on
Posted by: bill shriver | July 16, 2009 7:41 AM
Sherrill has performed as well as anyone on the team, but it's hard to make the closer MVP when you're in last place.
So as most valuable pitcher, clearly Bergy.
And as most valuable position player/DH, clearly Scott since he's been the only live bat in the lineup. The other guys have just been scratching out hits and keeping their averages respectable.
Posted by: Jess Kvetchin | July 16, 2009 9:16 AM
Without pitchng nothing happens.
In order of value:
1. Bergeson
2. Scott.
3 Jones
4.Baez
5. Johnson
Posted by: Anonymous | July 16, 2009 9:24 AM
Luke Scott / Brad Bergesen TIE
Looks like the Orioles are just 3 pitchers away from looking eye to eye with bosox and newyoke in 2 years.
Posted by: JB Lapree | July 16, 2009 10:00 AM
I WOULD HAVE SAID SCOTT, BUT WHEN YOU ARE BELOW .500 AND IN LAST, THERE ARE NO VALUABLE PLAYERS. IF THEY WERE SO VALUABLE, YOU'D BE WINNING MORE.
Posted by: COMMON SENSE | July 16, 2009 12:05 PM
Luke
Posted by: leon | July 16, 2009 12:38 PM
The first half MVP is the Orioles Mascot - the Bird. Need to see more of it.
Posted by: joe cee | July 16, 2009 1:02 PM
The first half MVP has to be Adam Jones. We new he was going to be good at some time but he has improved so much from last year. He has been the most consistent player we have . Props to Berg and scott for a close 2 and 3
Posted by: BGB09 | July 28, 2009 4:51 PM