Manny being manhandled
Woke up this morning to wall-to-wall coverage of Manny Ramirez's "it's not the end of the world'' comment from yesterday afternoon. On Mike and Mike in the Morning on ESPN Radio and ESPN2, the two were talking about it, calling experts about it and taking calls and e-mails about it. My first instinct was to defend Ramirez, because it seemed, once again, as if fans, especially Red Sox fans (and you know who you are and how you are) were pinning the blame on Ramirez when the Red Sox lose and pretty much taking him for granted when they win (for example, in 2004, when he was the World Series MVP and a monster day in and day out throughout the playoffs, the mantle of hero was pinned on Mr. Bloody Sock).
Also, the depictions of him as some kind of baseball idiot savant, some kind of RBI-producing Rain Man, always has struck me as demeaning and patronizing, and ignorant of how, crazy as it sounds, he didn't come out of the womb swinging a bat (to paraphrase an old Isiah Thomas quote) and actually worked hard throughout his life to get to the majors and become one of the most devastating hitters of this era.
But that's neither here nor there. With all this ranting and raving about millionaire ballplayers who don't bleed hard enough for their team (pun completely intended), I figured it was worth it to see how the Boston papers were handling this controversy. And lo and behold, here in today's Boston Globe ... ready for this? Some perspective. And evidence that the one killer quote was pulled completely out of context, and blown way the hell out of proportion.
And for me to say that, someone who despises when athletes hide behind the "quoted out of context'' line, that's saying something. But Ramirez's quote was neatly snipped and removed from any context, any flow of his thoughts, any larger picture or point.
Here's what the Globe quoted him as saying, in the sixth and seventh paragraphs of its story on the breaking of his lengthy silence with the reporters, on the off-day of the ALCS:
"We're just going to go have fun and play the game," he said. "That's it. If we go play hard and the thing doesn't come like it's supposed to come, we'll move on. We'll come next year. Why should we panic? We've got a great team. If it doesn't happen, good. We'll come next year and try to do it again.
"We're confident every day. It doesn't matter how things go for you. We're not going to give up. We're just going to go and play the game, like I've said, and move on. If it doesn't happen, so who cares? There's always next year. It's not like the end of the world or something."
Is it just me, or does the whole bit about not panicking, having confidence in what a great team this is, and not giving up sort of change the way everything else sounds?
I think it's just me. Or maybe no one has really seen or heard the surrounding quotes.
Or what preceded it: it seems that this dovetailed out of a huge (and, to me, pointless) discussion of his watching and raising his arms after his home run in Game 4, while the Sox were being pounded. Apparently, the Indians didn't like. Why they should have cared isn't clear, since they won the game and are one win away from the Series, but those "unwritten rules'' (these rules; unfortunately, we're making you pay to read this) say they're supposed to care. Ask Casey Blake.
So this all starts with Ramirez having to defend his being happy that he didn't let his team get shut out in a playoff game, and spirals into him saying he wasn't going to lose his mind over the possible outcome to Game 5, into one sentence from that speech being ripped from the midst of it and used to beat him over the head in a nationwide forum on his professionalism.
Then there's this, from that same Globe story:
Ramírez, unlike some of his teammates, hasn't slowed this offseason. He started hot in the ALDS and continued hot in the ALCS. He has been on base in 19 of his 31 postseason plate appearances. He has hit four home runs, tying David Ortiz for the most by a member of the Red Sox in one postseason. He is hitting .429 with a .613 on-base percentage and a 1.000 slugging percentage. He has 10 walks. He is patient, taking pitches, and at the same time, he is mashing the ball.
But dammit, he's being too flashy while he does it. And he's not offering to sacrifice a kidney for the Red Sox to win tonight.

Comments
Your post dovetails nicely with ESPN.com ombudsman Le Anne Schreiber's article regarding the demise of the news cycle and the rise of the opinion cycle. It seems that sports "news" is consisting more and more of blathering about things that "experts" have done little to no real research on. She suggests that if audiences stop watching and/or stop clicking it might incite those who run sports news gathering to change tact. But if all we have is essentially what we're given from high atop Mt. Bristol and everyone else accepts that as gospel and attempts to emulate it, how are we serfs really able to make change in how our sports and its heroes are presented to us?
I, for one, was perfectly happy when sports "news" was simply scores and highlights. I can't even get that from ESPNews anymore.
Posted by: brstevens | October 18, 2007 10:58 AM
Get off Manny's back. Manny is the best right handed hitter of our generation. he loves to play the game, is all business when he gets to the plate and realizes he is not going to win or lose this series by himself. If the ALCS depended on him, all on him, Boston would win. Period.
You're pissed because he hit a ball he knew was out and watched it? I am not. I will be pissed when he hits one, watches it, and it does not go out. Until then - shut up!
Posted by: Anonymous | October 18, 2007 11:04 AM
Manny isn't the only one characterized as a childlike "baseball savant". Bill Plaschke has used similar words in a critical column about Vlad Guerrero earlier this month (registration required):
http://www.latimes.com/sports/baseball/mlb/angels/la-sp-plaschke5oct05,1,792599,full.column?coll=la-headlines-sports-mlb-angels&ctrack=4&cset=true
As the boys at Fire Joe Morgan have pointed out (WARNING: naughty language), there's something a bit racist about painting Guerrero and Ramirez as simpletons who just wander around in a self-absorbed daze and hit home runs on instinct, isn't there?
Posted by: Kevin in Columbia | October 18, 2007 12:02 PM
To expound on my previous comment, it seems like some writers/talking heads/fans think of Latinos as a bunch of grinning Chico Escuelas: "Beisbol been berry, berry good to me." I guess we have Sammy Sosa to thank for that. When you hear comments like these, it's not a far leap to Gary Sheffield's "Latinos are easily controlled" B.S.
Posted by: Kevin in Columbia | October 18, 2007 12:04 PM
Ramirez is having a great season/postseason/career, but it is showboating when you raise your arms and your team is down by a couple runs. Its that way in little league to bar league softball. A walk off home run to win a game, yes celebrate, but there was still business to be taken care of.
Posted by: milton plitt | October 18, 2007 12:27 PM
I believe the attention given to Manny is due to the fact that he continually shows disrespect for the game. This rubs the majority of baseball fans the wrong way and might be the real issue underlying, not to mention the fact that he comes off as spoiled and unappreciative of his lucrative successful career.
Posted by: Baseball fan | October 18, 2007 12:31 PM
GREAT ARTICLE! Talk shows seem to feast on quotes like this...but guess what - he's right, it isn't the end of the world if they lose and those who think it is should get a life!
The Indian players who were all offended meed to get over themselves.
Posted by: Gary | October 18, 2007 5:47 PM
I'm with you on this one.
Posted by: GilesNow | October 18, 2007 8:34 PM
Wish I'd seen this earlier, Mr. Steele.
I agree with you. Even without the surrounding quotes, hearing a ballplayer say that losing a form of entertainment won't be the end of the world was refreshing. To me it in no way reflected on his dedication or commitment. Look at the numbers, look at the career and tell me if you'd rather have Manny Ramirez or any of a dozen O's outfielders of recent years. Make that the past 20 Orioles outfielders over the past 10 years.
Posted by: j. roberts | October 20, 2007 9:22 AM
Ironic, that Casey Blake could be considered a goat for the Indians loss in Game 7.
Manny has a zen approach to the game. Caring without caring.
Posted by: Malcolm Wong | October 23, 2007 3:09 AM