The Bullets and Sports Legends
My column on Sunday about the lack of a Bullets presence at Sports Legends at Camden Yards drew a good number of responses. The biggest one came from the person I unfortunately wasn't able to reach in time to include in the column, but who I was hoping I'd hear from soon: Michael Gibbons, executive director of Sports Legends and the Babe Ruth Museum. We also spoke by phone this morning, and he agreed to have his email to me run here:
"Your Sunday column had my cellphone clamoring pretty early. I enjoyed your article on Sports Legends but wish you had contacted me first to gather my perspective on the Bullets.
First off, I'm a native Baltimorean who grew up loving the Bullets, so I understand their importance to our sports heritage. I remember attending games at the coliseum.
Sports museums can only represent what their collection bears, and the Babe Ruth Museum is still working to establish better lines to secure Bullets memorabilia, photographs and broadcast materials. But we are actively working on it.
The folks who run sports museums also know that they must have years worth of programming in the works. It's always good to have a major show in the planning stages, so that the public will have something new to attend year-in-and-year-out.
In 2007 the Babe Ruth Museum is planning a full renovation of the Babe Ruth Birthplace, our other attraction. In 2008...look for something major on the Bullets. Also, something on local high school sports, perhaps a hall of champions covering all high school athletics in the Baltimore area. City-Poly, Dunbar basketball, the lacrosse scene, track and field, etc.
I told Phil [Wood] on his Thursday radio show that our future programming and exhibition schedule will not just be about basketball and high school sports, but about our area's boxing and ice hockey histories.
Lots to do, with space and $$$ playing a role in it all.
By the way, we are working with the [Reginald Lewis] African American Museum on that NBA show [on May 20], and will be doing programming at Sports Legends featuring several prominent Baltimore-area former and current NBA'ers in conjunction with that effort.''
In our phone conversation, Gibbons acknowledged that two substantial challenges face him in any Bullets display: memorabilia and money. There was no shortage of Orioles and Colts artifacts to put up at Sports Legends, but Bullets stuff is harder to come by, and so are donors. The same goes for the other sports and institutions he wants represented in the museum. "When it came to the Bullets, I just didn't have anything to put together in a timely fashion,'' he said. "We've got the space for it.''
The good news is that he has connected with a Baltimore Bullets legend to spearhead a drive to collect artifacts and solicit sponsors. It sounds as if the recognition of the Bullets in the museum really is "in the works.'' Thanks again to Michael Gibbons for filling us in (and, of course, for being understanding about not being included in the original column).
Now, there have to be some people out there who have something they can give, physically or monetarily, to this drive. Maybe you know somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody who has stuff, or who wants to contribute in any way to creating this. Here's how you can contact Sports Legends at Camden Yards.

Comments
Fantastic news David. While I pleasantly reminisce about Gus and Pearl, Marin and Loughery, scary thoughts of John Tresvant and Stan Love are crowding in. Geez, was Dorie Murray a Baltimore Bullet too? :)
Posted by: brian | April 24, 2006 11:53 AM
Has anyone actually done a study to see if the changing of the team's name from Bullets to Wizards actually caused a decrease in armed violence. I loved the Bullets name, and I never shot anything... except a basketball!
As for your Bonds column today, David, I hope nothing gets thrown at Barry except verbal taunts. But, your swipe at Ruth seemed a little off base, considering Babe reached his 714 homers in 8398 at bats, a number Barry has already exceeded by almost a thousand. Aaron needed more than 11,000 at bats to reach 714. Facts aside, at this rate, it does seem like more of a pursuit of Ruth, because at his current pace Barry may never catch Aaron, which would be just fine.
Posted by: Larry Blucher | April 24, 2006 5:27 PM