Zrebiec: Opportunity still knocks in rotation
It is widely assumed that the Orioles rotation is set with veterans Kevin Millwood and Jeremy Guthrie joining youngsters Brad Bergesen, Brian Matusz and Chris Tillman. However, pitching coach Rick Kranitz was adamant on Thursday that David Hernandez and Jason Berken will be given every opportunity to crack the rotation.
The two second-year pitchers, who combined to make 43 starts last year, are taking the mindset that if they perform well, things will fall into place, and both would be more than happy to pitch out of the bullpen.
“For me, I don’t really look at it as there are no spots. I just go out and control what I can control and the rest will take care of itself,” said Hernandez who went 4-10 with a 5.42 ERA in 20 outings (19 starts). “I kind of figure that they’ll give me a chance to show what I can do with starting at the beginning. But if that doesn’t work out, there are plenty of other spots in the bullpen.”
Berken, who went 6-12 with a 6.54 ERA in 24 starts in 2009, said, “Whatever they want me to do, I’ll do. As of right now, I’m focused on starting, but if it does end up being in the bullpen, then that’s what it is. But anything I can do to help, I’m more than willing to do. I feel like I’m capable of doing both things.”
As for the position players, they don’t have to report to spring training until Monday. However, Nick Markakis, Adam Jones, Felix Pie, Justin Turner, Scott Moore, Robert Andino, Blake Davis and Rhyne Hughes are already here. Markakis is still sporting his lumberjack beard and carried his son Taylor out to the back practice fields.
-- Jeff Zrebiec






> 
Comments
It's good to see Markakis and Jones showing up early. Just little things like that set a tone for the season.
Posted by: Mikepcfl | February 19, 2010 11:16 AM
You simply cant count on young pitchers who have limited exposure around the league Like Bergs Tillman Matusz etc.
If they can make the adjustments and pitch intelligently than their talent wont be wasted! That is why i believe this article is bang on with regards to openings being available in our rotation!!
Posted by: Wayne | February 19, 2010 11:22 AM
Wayne, spoke like the genious you think you are...
Posted by: Human | February 19, 2010 11:25 AM
Wrong Wayne Human!!
I like the Os
Just stating the rotation will be open to whomever pitcher wants it the most!!
Posted by: Wayne | February 19, 2010 11:33 AM
Wayne is right, this staff is not yet the same incantation as the 1987 Braves. Potential is what managers talk about and what sportswriters write about. It is hot air and on paper
Posted by: tony | February 19, 2010 11:42 AM
Jeff: does Arrieta have shot as 5th starter, with a big spring?
..............................................................................................
Pete's reply: He has a shot if somebody gets hurt or totally underperforms.
Posted by: John from Kensington | February 19, 2010 12:15 PM
Wayne,
In the word of the once true wayne on these blogs.... Stop!
You're simply undeserving of a HOF name. It would be like another Cal playing whem Cal played. Or like another Brooks while Brooksie played.
You either need to pick up your game, or just stop.
Posted by: Anonymous in honor of wayne | February 19, 2010 12:26 PM
The rotation is set unless:
Guthrie continues his back to being what got him waived by Cleveland in the first place;
Tillman fails to make necessary adjustments and continues to allow 2-3 home runs per game; or
Bergensen regresses to what many projected in the first place, a player whose talent toped out at AAA.
Not cited is the possibility of injury to Millwood who is just flat out old!
And a shout out to old "Wayne": Eat me!
Posted by: Wayne U | February 19, 2010 1:20 PM
You need to grow up old wayne..if you werent so negative you might have more respect on here!!
and your multiple anonymous posting identities dont count!
Posted by: Wayne | February 19, 2010 3:49 PM
Negative Wayne
Also comparing yourself (a common poster) to an actual respected university is just another part of your problem (and laughable)!
Tiger is apparently trying to change..why dont you look into some appropriate treatment for whatever is bothering you!
Posted by: Wayne | February 19, 2010 3:55 PM
Me thinks that old Wayne and Negative Wayne are the same people having an argument with themselves. Didn't I once say something about a man being an idiot when arguing with themselves?? I am sure it is in one of my books.
Posted by: Sigmnd Freud | February 19, 2010 7:15 PM
well if your calling yourself an idiot so be it "Negative Wayne"!
but we both know that right wayne?
Posted by: Wayne | February 19, 2010 7:23 PM
I have to disagree with sigmund (whiny Wayne) as the new Wayne actually has a point and seems to have a much different and intelligent point of view.
lets face it anyone "idiot" can complain.
Posted by: Alnon | February 19, 2010 7:28 PM
Alnon
Thanks but this whole blog thing is mostly negative. The board where you start your own thread is full of Waynes andnot worth anyones time!
Posted by: Wayne | February 19, 2010 7:32 PM
Would the team ever consider splitting a starting spot with two young guys? They could have Tillman and Matusz go every 5th day. Have one pitch 5-6 innings and the other pitch 3-4 and go back and forth. Seems a good way to get them regular work, keep their innings down and keep the bullpen fresh. Has anyone done this before?
Posted by: JDuane | February 19, 2010 8:29 PM
JDuane
What you're describing is imagination, innovation. The league has little, and though I am an Orioles fan true and blue, the Orioles have none!
It seems all team struggle to find 5 quality starters, all most all fail to start more than 3, with a major talent drop off in the 4th; 5th starters tend to be scrubs, journeymen with 5+eras.
Why not have a rotation of just 4 starters, the way things were when the Orioles were a near dynasty? You could keep them on a strict pitch count (.i.e. 100) and use to young studs (i.e. Tillman/Matusz) in an augmented pen to supply a constant stream of high-quality relief pitching.
Believe me when I say--it will never happen and if it does, the Orioles will be followers, not leaders.
Posted by: Wayne U | February 19, 2010 10:12 PM
Glad to hear there's open competition for the 4th and 5th spots in the rotation. Tillman and Matuz need more time at AAA anyway.The O's play the AL East a lot in April,why throw them to the wolves?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 20, 2010 8:17 AM
Matuz need more time at AAA anyway.The O's play the AL East a lot in April,why throw them to the wolves? Posted by: Anonymous
i guess you didn't see matuz pitch last year particularly hos last 3 starts.
Posted by: fkterp | February 20, 2010 9:13 AM
It's time for Peter A. to give up on his Nazi hair policy. The fans like to see interesting looking guys. Baseball is entertainment after all. Eddie Murray, Goose Gossage, Rollie Fingers, Johnny Damon- baseball has a history of interesting hair.
Posted by: Bags | February 20, 2010 9:18 AM
Come on, guys, let's stop making this blog about the various flavors of wayne and make it about the Orioles.
Whichever wayne said it, he is right, you cannot totally count on young pitchers. They are going to have rough spots, it's their nature. Glavine went through it, Maddux, Verlander, hell, even Sandy Koufax was in danger of being beaten out by Tommy LaSorda and didn't become a consistent dominating pitcher until he was 26.
Tillman, Matusz, Arrieta, Bergeson and the rest, no matter how talented they are, will have their problems. What will make them better pitchers is if they learn from their mistakes, the way those guys I mentioned did.
Posted by: ken | February 20, 2010 10:31 AM
Agreed Doug,
It's like a wayne fest, all the time. All the impostors keep doing is making wayne more and more relevant. I liked the old wayne, but not this much.
I agree with you about the staff. What I worry most about is that the orioles have put to much stock into what they think they have. I'll give you Matusz. There's no reason however, that guys like Tillman and Arrieta are being touted as the next MAddux or Verlander. Maybe they will shine, but the extreme odds are that they will not. And Bergeson - we just don't know.
Very concerned!
Posted by: doug | February 20, 2010 12:05 PM