Torre book should be a fun read
For those of you who find the New York Yankees and their annual antics as entertaining as I do, there's a book coming out on Feb. 3 by Sports Illustrated writer Tom Verducci that reportedly goes into the greatest detail yet about the final years that Joe Torre (left) managed the team.
Here's a link to the New York Daily News story about the book, in which Verducci writes that some Yankees teammates referred to Alex Rodriguez behind his back as "A-Fraud" and Torre dishes on his unpleasant parting from the team he led to four world titles.
I'm sure after we all read it, we're going to count our blessings that the Orioles don't go in for high-strung superstar players, fascinating subplots and exciting big-money lineups that take you right up to the playoffs and then let you down. I know I will.
Getty Images







Comments
It should be a good read . As much as I hate the Yankees , I am still intrigued by their shenanigans . Same applies to the Cowboys .
Posted by: the artist formerly known as jack in hebron | January 25, 2009 11:47 AM
You're not on radio at all today?
Posted by: Paul B Towson | January 25, 2009 12:30 PM
Pete, It should be a good read. I thought the Yankees never should have gotten rid of Torre, a highly underrated manager. Yes, it can be argued that he always led teams that were loaded with talent, but the pressure of managing in New York for the Boss, of handling a roster of overinflated egos, of keeping the team on an even keel when going through extended stretches with key players on the DL, of dealing with that city's intense media scrutiny, not to mention, of going up against teams in baseball's toughest division, certainly must be considered as well.
He always managed there with a quiet strength and dignity that brought honor to that storied franchise, and I think established himself as an all-time Yankee great.
On the Orioles front, now that the team released Oscar Salazar and may be out of the running for Ty Wigginton (the Phillies are interested), do you think that gives Kevin Millar a better shot at being re-signed or does the team have no interest in him regardless of how the market plays out?
..............................................................................................
Peter's reply: I'm starting to think he's not in their plans regardless, though they haven't ruled him entirely out. Once again, if they added a veteran pitcher that made them more likely to go with a 12-man staff, maybe there is more roster flexibility, but I think Huff is going to play 130 games there.
Posted by: Ken Francis | January 25, 2009 12:36 PM
Pete:
Yep, far better to get your hopes dashed in April and the go about the real Baltimore business of talking about the Ravens, a team that surely has no subplots or high strung super stars. Hoholho.
Posted by: Carl Mogensen | January 25, 2009 1:06 PM
Um, right. Clearly, Pete, it's better to have a team that finishes with a losing record every year.
Posted by: rob in SD | January 25, 2009 1:22 PM
Give Roberts his 4 years. Our rotation will finally be ready in 2011, when Matusz and Arrieta will be on board joining Tillman and Guthrie; and if we have signed Roberts, we'll have Snyder at 1B, Brian at 2B, perhaps Izturis at SS for a third year, and Rowell or Henson at 3B; Wieters at C; Scott at DH if we haven't traded him by then; and Pie (if he works out), Jones, and Nick in the OF. That's a contender, especially strong up the middle. Without Roberts, a much less impressive team both offensively and defensively.
Posted by: grizzledvet | January 25, 2009 1:43 PM
Yes, I feel much better with inadequate lineups, pitching staffs that always seem to be riddled with injuries and players who look doomed here and then blossom elsewhere once they get proper coaching.
Posted by: Brian | January 25, 2009 3:38 PM
What's that? Uh -- Playoffs? Don't talk about -- playoffs? You kidding me? Playoffs? I just hope the Orioles can win a game!
Posted by: DMG | January 25, 2009 3:52 PM
A lot of us fans were bummed when the Orioles let go of Oscar Salazar as they've gone in pursuit of Ty Wigginton. Maybe we shouldn't have been, and here's why.
In his column today at ESPN.com, Buster Olney, while examining some telling player stats around the majors last season, writes: "The guy who ranked fifth in the majors in OPS against left-handed pitchers remains unsigned -- Ty Wigginton, who absolutely hammered lefties in 2008, posting a .424 on-base percentage and a .631 slugging percentage."
Given the well-documented struggles of Oriole lineups against southpaws over the past fews years, Andy MacPhail's interest makes perfect sense. Whether the O's have a chance now with the Phillies expressing interest is another thing, but Wigginton's is a bat that would be a definite upgrade for the Orioles offense.
Posted by: Ken Francis | January 25, 2009 3:59 PM
Can't wait until Millar writes his book...
Posted by: a fan with delusions of grandeur | January 25, 2009 4:04 PM
Pete,
There you go again, no I want my ownership to SPEND SPEND SPEND, but someone has to be in control. When players have direct access to the GM and owner (see Washington Redskins and Clinton Portis) the Head Coach or manager are placed in an awkward position. Coaches and Managers make 200K and the player makes 11Million it's a no win situation. Ok so you do the cheap route and never compete, or you spend big bucks and are always competitive and might have a locker room explosion, but I''ll ALWAYS go for the opportunity to be competitive. This is NOT a reason not to spend money, just another excuse for being cheap!
Posted by: Keith Rowe | January 25, 2009 7:06 PM
Pete-
I have always admired Torre. Brian Cashman just seems like the kind of GM who would not look out for his manager, so that news is no news. I believe a lot of us hope the Dodgers meet (and beat) the Yanks in the World Series. That would make all well with the world. Sweet justice for Mr. Torre !!
Posted by: patrick lynch | January 26, 2009 6:26 AM
I'll gladly trade for that kind of drama. Better failure in the playoffs than in July.
.............................................................................................
Pete's reply: Of course you would. I was being a big sarcastic.
Posted by: Punk Flamingo | January 26, 2009 6:45 AM