Today's featured comment
Today's featured comment is from a statistical guru who calls himself Waspman. Now I don't know if he's a superhero who dresses up like a wasp, or a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant who was at a loss for a screenname, but I do know he takes his football analysis very seriously:
Waspman's take: I use four criteria for my rankings. Three are weighted based on the each team's last eight games with the high and low tossed out to reduce anomalies and the two least recent games given reduced impact. They are Point Percentage, Point Differential, and Time of Victory (or Defeat). Each is worth 20 percent.
The fourth criterion -- the remaining 40 percent -- is based on Strength of Victory (or Defeat). It takes the entire season into consideration and is not weighted.
Furthermore, the SoV/D is a dynamic measure. For example, the Ravens lost to the Colts and defeated the Dolphins. Every win Miami gets helps Baltimore's ranking; every loss Indianapolis gets hurts Baltimore's ranking.
Much to my surprise, the Ravens moved up to seventh place. They have been as low as 22nd place this season. Most of their current ranking is bolstered by their convincing wins with little negation from their close losses. The Indy game right now looks to be aberrant. Their ranking will surely suffer if they have another genuine clunker in the next couple od weeks.
Oh and yes, the Titans are Number One (third straight week), the Giants are Number Two (second straight week), and the Redskins are Number Four (their highest position although their entire division has represented the Top Ten most of the year).
Pete's take: And all this time I've just been going with the toughtest-looking team mascot.






Comments
lol, well I hope all these statistics equal more wins and a WR to step up because we just lost 1 of the few speedsters on the team for the year. Mark Clayton of 2006, please stand up!
Posted by: Kevin, Iraq | October 29, 2008 4:03 PM