Bring back Curt?
If the Orioles want a veteran pitcher as a No. 2 behind Erik Bedard, someone to give them innings and around 12 wins, as manager Dave Trembley said earlier this week, they should make a run at Curt Schilling.
That's my opinion. What do you think?
He'd probably consider it if Gary Thorne agreed to wash his socks at least once.
Funny how Schilling is viewed as a guy who could be a mentor of sorts for the younger pitchers on the staff, and perhaps assist Bedard in taking the next step toward being a dominant No. 1 for six months. This is quite the U-turn from when Schilling first pitched for the Orioles and was scolded by at least one player for not taking his job seriously and wasting his talents.
He was an air-head. Now he's a positive influence.
Man, we're all getting old.
My only concern is he'd still want to blog, and I don't need the extra competition.
Tune into the Insiders Roundtable Show at noon tomorrow on WHFS (105.7-FM) and you'll hear an hour-long interview with team president Andy MacPhail, who says nobody on the club is untouchable. Not with this record.
MacPhail also praised manager Dave Trembley for being the man who can make the Orioles a solid fundamental team, because their margin for error is "razor-thin."
Coincidentally, that also was Brandon Fahey's nickname in high school.
The Orioles are fully aware that the free-agent field is just as thin, and MacPhail says only a few available players will make a difference. Teams are locking up their younger players. He singled out Torii Hunter and Aaron Rowand as exceptions.
To the reader who asks if I remember Andre Thornton's walk-off bunt against the Orioles, that sounds real familiar, but I haven't thought about it in years. I believe you're right.
The image of Eddie Murray at third base still blows me away. Bad experiment -- right up there with Javy Lopez at first base -- but the Orioles wanted to keep Lee May at first base.
Imagine how this club's history would have changed if Murray stayed at third. No Todd Cruz? No way!
Hey, the guy was the starting third baseman for a large chunk of the '83 season.

Comments
Personally I don't think Curt Schilling is a good idea. He seems to be good for the media since he never stops talking and he and his wife do a lot of charity work. The problem is that he doesn't really fit in well with teammates and even though he helped the Dbacks win the series, he never was thought of very well by fans or teammates.
Consider that Randy Johnson was brought back to Az and is thought of much better than Curt. Randy who never will win Mr. Personality or Mr. Interview seems to be a much better teammate, get along with the guys player than Curt.
Remembering all of RJ's blowups in NY, that doesn't say much about Curt. If the Orioles get a veteran quality starter, they need someone less abrasive and willing to help out the other starters and a bit lower key than Curt.
Posted by: Rich | September 29, 2007 11:57 AM
Bringing Schilling here next year doesn't sound like a good idea. He's certainly a fierce competitor, who has been a brilliant pitcher. But he's faded--a power pitcher who can't hit 90--and there are recurring health questions. I'm afraid he'd be next year's Benson or Wright in that respect. Aren't there questions, too, about his popularity among team mates? I only know what I read in that regard, but that's what I read. So, as I see it, you spend a lot of money on a past-prime pitcher likely to get hurt and to alienate teammates. Not exactly appealing.
Posted by: Greg | September 29, 2007 12:14 PM
Someone needs to say this if it hasn't been said already: Schilling is referred to as outspoken when in fact he talks and talks to the point of being quite annoying. (At times he seems to be a presence on the Dan Patrick show -- which I admittedly tune into very rarely -- more than Rob Dibble used to be.)
Rich, I'm not familiar with your information about how well he fit in with teammates. I do, though, like your nickname for him (Mr. Interview).
In a nutshell: Schilling's got the heart and the drive to succeed; I just don't think he has the stuff any longer. Rest assured, this postseason will paint a clearer picture for all of us.
Posted by: Dimitrios (now in L.A.) | September 29, 2007 12:22 PM
Why not take a chance on Schilling? Assuming he'd come here, he could fill a spot in the rotation and give one of our younger pitchers--Liz, Olson--more time to develop. #38 might also be a wonderful influence on Guthrie, who appears to be a special player in the making. Go for it, I say.
Posted by: threedaysrest | September 29, 2007 12:25 PM
sSchlling would be fine to sign. Let's face it, he knows how to win, he has a good work ethic and he's a definite improvement over Jared Wright, Trachsel, Benson and the little leaguers we brought in during the middle of the year. I still say every starting pitcher we have in the minors start on 3 days rest and let them stretch out to pitch 7-9 innings a game rather than 5 2/3's. There are too few good pitchers in baseball to begin with. Let the best ones you have pitch the most. Why should pitching be different today than it was 20-30 years ago. Don't say the money. Why would you pay more to get less? The Orioles need to look at taking a couple of rows out inleft field. You can't win with a short left field power alley and a short porch in right. You need to give the pitchers a better chance. This isn't pony league.
Posted by: freddy kallens | September 29, 2007 12:40 PM
Wasn't that Gary Carter - playing for the Indians -who put down that walk-off bunt?
Schilling is a great idea, but why would he want to come here when he would definitely get some offers from the contending clubs.
Maybe, Tigers would be interested in trading for somebody like Tejada since Carlos Guillen is going to be moved to first base next year. Their farm system is replete with promising players. And how about Furcal for Tejada. Dodgers have been looking for power in their line-up.
Posted by: SUDHIR | September 29, 2007 12:56 PM
Hell, even the re-acquisition of Trachsel could probably secure 12 wins, about 25+ 6 IP starts, and lotsa mentoring, albeit in how to slow down the show and overprepare beyond your capabilities at times. But from what you've previously reported, it seems as if Guthrie was more likely to listen than Bedard. Aside from a touch more credibility from having been an ace during his prime, I don't think Schilling naturally carries any more credibility than, say, a Dave Duncan type pitching coach.
So are we gonna emulate the LA Angels of Lake Elsinore Nevermore and rely on pitching, defense, and try to make every runner on first go to third on a single? I'd still feel better if we at least kept a power bat or two on the bench, like Sal Fasano, who can pop 10-15 HRs a year when he's matched with pitchers who don't know him and serve up high fastballs inside. Just don't expect Miggy, Melvin, Huff, BRob, Ramon to rediscover their power strokes anytime soon, and Markakis will rise to Will Clark power numbers at best, meaning we've gotta be more consistent getting ducks on the pond in the 1-2 holes.
Posted by: bill l | September 29, 2007 1:08 PM
i don't think the O's need to spend a lot of money on a mentor for Bedard. Bedard is the one guy who seemed to turn the corner this season.
maybe though...the O's should consider hiring a life coach or a shrink for EVERYONE else! Bedard i'm not worried about.
Posted by: Teenage Mutant Ninja Angelos | September 29, 2007 1:15 PM
Schilling... Have you sent your common sense on ahead to beat the rush to get out of town after tomorrow's game... Come on Roch.... you can come up with something better than that... With ideas like that it would seem that you want to turn this club into more of a circus than it already is. The Oriole AARP contract has been terminated.... period !!
Posted by: a fan with delusions of grandeur | September 29, 2007 1:27 PM
Definitely not feeling the Schilling in Charm City. The guy basically has nothing in his tank and I think he would be more of nuissance than a asset. He doesn't strike out batters like he used. He is an NL pitcher now... Bedard, Guthrie, Loewen, Cabrera plus a either rolling the dice and seeing if Leo can untap Jason Jennings' potential or if Freddy Garcia or Bartolo Colon can bounce back from injuries... if not let Olson, Liz, Spoone or Penn take their lumps and see if they can make the adjustments...
Posted by: Driskill4life | September 29, 2007 1:40 PM
Roch:
Saw you out last night - you are the pimp.
That is all.
Posted by: JTK | September 29, 2007 1:46 PM
Roch, great article on the umpiring this season, thats something thats been bugging me for months.
Posted by: Alan in VA | September 29, 2007 1:48 PM
I don't remember it as Andre Thornton, but Joe Carter who bunted with the bases loaded to beat Mark Williamson. Wasn't it '89?
Posted by: Chris | September 29, 2007 1:52 PM
I don't know, Roch. Isn't he getting a little long in the tooth? 41 maybe?
I can only think of a couple of power type pitchers who were successful into their 40's, Nolan Ryan and Roger Clemens. Surely there's a few more.
Oh, yea, I forgot Satchel Page! He pitched into his 60's.
OK, you talked me into it. Bring Schilling back. And while were at it, let's make it old home week and see if Moose is interested. Isn't this the last year of his NY deal? He's been very sharp since they sat him for a few weeks. He's late 30's, correct?
Let's see, Bedard, Schilling, Moose, Guthrie and a psycho analyzed, maturing, coached up man about town, D. Cabrera.
I'm not kidding here. A couple of very intelligent, battle tested veterans in a rotation with 3 of the best young arms in baseball. Anybody else think that might work?
Maybe not. Never mind, Roch, stupid idea. Like everything else the Baltimore Orioles do, it'll probably just blow up in their face somehow.
I wonder if Liz can close. Can he mix his great stuff in with high stakes, game saving situations? Can he channel Clint Eastwood's High Plains Drifter? It's worked for Papelbon.
Posted by: daytona boy | September 29, 2007 2:48 PM
Schilling will cost picks. No thanks! At this point picks are more important than avoiding last place next year. We need guys who can play to push out guys who can't. There is no shortage of guys on the 40 man roster who would be out of baseball if not for the Orioles. All this talk of being a player in Free Agency makes me think the Orioles still have not learned.
Posted by: Danny | September 29, 2007 3:03 PM
To SUDHIR...forget a trade of Tejada to the Tigers...Guillen has already stated that he won't move from SS unless he's replaced with a Gold Glover...
Posted by: Glassman | September 29, 2007 3:57 PM
Schilling wants nothing to do w/ this poisoned organization. More concerning is hearing that McPhail specifically mentioned Torii Hunter & Aaron Rowand as possible targets. It appears the commitment to mediocrity will continue. The only way for a team to build a pennant winning team with our budget is to rebuld via a youth movement. Other than that this org will never build a winner.
Posted by: JWBBZ's | September 29, 2007 3:59 PM
The bunt I remember was in the movie Major League...Tom Berenger bunted w/ the bases loaded to end that game. I think he played for the Indians too, right? And he sure looked like Gary Carter w/ that brillo 'fro.
Posted by: lerxst | September 29, 2007 4:01 PM
everyones favorite umpire...'Ramirez writhed in pain after John Maine's pitch seemed to hit him on the left hand in the fourth inning, but plate umpire C.B. Bucknor ruled it a foul ball off the knob of the bat. Ramirez, the NL Rookie of the Year last season, knelt on the ground as he was checked by a trainer.'
Posted by: jim66 | September 29, 2007 4:12 PM
Getting Schilling now will be like when the Yankees acquired Johnson two years ago. He is an old man who will be even older next year. Benson will have a better year than Schilling. You heard it here first.
Posted by: Anthony | September 29, 2007 4:12 PM
First of all NO TO SCHILLING!!
We have a habit of looking at older players with big names more than actual talent. And no I'm not saying schilling has no talent but just look at past experiences. I'll just go with the first one that comes to mind....
Sosa! The O's were so excited to get him because ohhh he's hit so many homeruns the year before so we need to get him asap. Yea a lot of good that did. He blew and we wasted money.
A word of advice to the FO, don't go for Schilling or the rumored Barry Steriod Bonds. Waste of money. Use that money and get us some fresh young talent. Oh and also ask Angelos if you can borrow some of his asbestos/MASN money to buy some quality pitching, and to pay some players what they actually deserve. Both B-Rob and Markakis deserve a hell of a lot more than what they are making. (Yes 4.2 million for B-Rob is plenty, but he deserves to be the highest paid on the team and Markakis should be right behind him)
Posted by: Jennifer | September 29, 2007 5:47 PM
Com'on, you know that there's no way that Curt Schilling would ever come back to play in Bmore. Especially at this point in career, he's going to play for a contender, and nothing less. Unless the Orioles make him a financial offer that he can't refuse, and that ain't going to happen in Bmore.
Posted by: DSpedden | September 29, 2007 7:41 PM
No to Schilling! Please no. We don't need another old guy. And we don't need Musina either. If you want to bring in any one with experience, let him be younger than 35.
Posted by: Chuck from PA | September 29, 2007 8:50 PM
A thought re Schilling and his teammates: Clay Buchholtz raved about Schilling in his no-hitter press conference. He said Schilling had been helpful as a mentor, and added, I think these were the exact words, "He's been so nice to me." So maybe the big guy's not that hard to get along with after all.
Posted by: Madwoman | September 30, 2007 10:19 AM
I agree with Anthony. I think Benson will have a better season than Schilling would. I think bringing Kris back would be great.
Posted by: TheBigDMoney | September 30, 2007 10:33 AM
I say yes to Schilling!!!
There was a young, out of control, loud mouth, flame-throwing pitcher that came up with the Birds in the late 80's, by the name of Curt Schilling! As the reports have it, it took a sit down with Roger Clemens to get Schilling to learn that it takes more than a high 90's fastball & a truck load of money to put your name in the record books! You have to respect the game (same thing Trembley's preaching!)! You have to be a professional (also a Trembley trait!)! And you have to know that your team is dependant on your every pitch!
All of these values need to be passed down to 15 day D.L. for a hang-nail Bedard, I can throw it 9 million miles an hour but don't know where it's going Cabrera, & look at my strut, I deserve a starting job in the big leagues Penn!
I say give Schilling a chance!!!
Posted by: TIM SWAN | October 4, 2007 12:22 AM