Pryce unveils new dance
Defensive end Trevor Pryce showed off a new dance in honor of his three-year-old son who is also named Trevor: the Fizzy Wiggle.
After Pryce sacked and stripped Chiefs quarterback Brodie Croyle to give the Ravens possession at the Kansas City 9-yard line with 1:34 left in the fourth quarter, Pryce shook and shimmied on the field before jogging back to the sideline.
"My son taught it to me," Pryce said, adding that his son's nickname is "Fizzy." "I said I was going to do it for him. I guess I'm going to be a highlight. This is going to be bad. I didn't it expect to cause a fumble to end the game or something like that."








Comments
for all the people who think the Ravens win was a sign of bad things to come, look at the other "contenders" results...
Pit-Ten 13-10
NE- Buf 25-24
SD- Oak 24-20
Ind-Jax 14-12
Except for Pittsburgh, any above loss would have been a huge choke job and people are walking around complaining that the Ravens D isn't that great. A couple freak plays kept KC in the game!!!
Posted by: SHAMROCK | September 15, 2009 10:55 AM
Somehow I can't imagine a Morning Sun headline from the 50's reading, "Donovan Unveils New Dance." No, the other team wouldn't have allowed him to live long enough to finish it. Guess times are different. We have Mark Gastineau to thank.
Posted by: Tom in FL | September 15, 2009 12:14 PM
Edward, I read your article on the running game and McGahee's comment that they should be called the Fantastic Three... but I say they should be called "Two Big Macs with a side of Rice"
Much better... let's get the ball rolling on this.
Posted by: Sprizouse | September 15, 2009 4:33 PM
Artie Donovan wouldnt even make a NFL europe team nowadays if he was magically transported to modern times. These are pure athletes weighing 250 plus pounds and running 4.7 40 yard dashes, they deserve to celebrate!!
Posted by: Steeler Dan | September 15, 2009 9:26 PM
Two Big Macs with a side of Rice. Very funny stuff. Good one.
Posted by: Chuck G | September 16, 2009 7:27 AM
SPIZOUSE: Back in the day when Artie Played, They played purely for the love of the game. They worked in the off season to feed their families and they laid the foundation for todays players to prosper. If you wanna unfairly compare the players from the past to those of today, ask yourself these questions: How would todays players do if they had to work in the off-season, When steroids weren't around or available, when playing football was a passion and not a big business. when the medical field was not nearly as advanced as today, when arthroscopic surgery is now commonplace and is used to help players today when in the 40's,50's and 60's the injuries were played through(in alot of cases) or just ended great athletes careers. I sure won't discredit many of today's athletes but to say that these men of courage could not compete with todays players is as ABSURD as saying THAT OUR NATIONAL HEROES FROM WORLD WAR 2 ARE COWARDS COMPARED TO TODAYS SOLDIERS(OR VICE VERSA: THEY ARE ALL HEROES). The Athletes today have so much more knowledge, Equipment, medical advances.$$$$MONEY, AND MANY MORE ADVANTAGES than the guys of Artie's generation that you cannot be serious about trying to compare them. A WHOLE DIFFERENT GAME BACK THEN that I seriously doubt many of today's players would have a chance "BACK IN THE DAY" when football players were MEN, not spoiled, ungrateful SISSIES like some of Todays players(not all are in this class). So Mr.SPIZHOUSE I SAY TO YOU: GET A LIFE AND STOP PUTTING YOUR FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH WHEN YOU SPEAK........IF TODAYS PLAYERS(COLLECTIVELY) HAD ANY COUTH, THEY WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE PLAYERS FROM THE PAST, who are responsible for their prosperity. The fact that these players are not taken care of is a TESTAMENT TO THE SELFISHNESS AND DISRESPECT that todays players have for what should be THEIR HEROES. These players of today(not all, but quite a few) Sould be ashamed of theirselves. so mr Spizouse you can take your comment and throw it right in the SHIZ HOUSE...
Posted by: dennis | September 16, 2009 7:52 AM
That was a long comment there Dennis, but unfortunately it wasn't me who wrote what you're talking about. It was Steeler Dan.
In the future, can you please make sure to properly direct your hatred not only to the guy who makes the comments, but also to every guy who's a Steelers fan? Thanks...
Posted by: Sprizouse | September 16, 2009 3:16 PM