The Commissioner
NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has been working in the background with former players about their pension and disability payments. The league has taken a massive public relations hit from former greats who have gone to corporate sponsors to complain about their pensions. That move has certainly gotten Goodell's attention. For years, the NFLPA has ignored former greats like the late John Unitas, John Mackey and Herb Adderly about pension and disability. Adderly makes less than $250 a month despite being a Hall of Famer. He no longer wears his Super Bowl ring earned playing with the Packers. Others like former Bears coach Mike Ditka, also a Hall of Fame tight end, have volunteered to auction off his championship and use the proceeds to help former players, a lot of them suffering mentally as well as physically. One former Raven in the fight is defensive end Michael McCrary, who had 11 knee surgeries during his time in Baltimore. In a recent interview, McCrary said he has had trouble standing for more than 45 seconds at one time. Even while playing, doctors recommended that he stop and have knee replacement surgery. The problem is that McCrary, still under age 40, is too young to have his knees replaced, so he is holding off on using a lot of medication to help with the pain and depression. The Ravens have been extremely helpful working with McCrary. - Mike Preston


Comments
It truly is disgusting how the NFL has treated past players who paved the way for the game today. Each year I continue to hope it will change...
Posted by: Darien | March 22, 2007 10:33 AM
Mike,
Exactly what is the status of John Mackey? He was a hero of mine when I was growing up...man, could he break some tackles. I recently saw something about a John Mackey Foundation. What is it?
thanks
Posted by: jls | March 22, 2007 11:10 AM
this is my first time on this blog, though some may knoe me from Roch's blog. todays blog, i dont have much to say about, and i knoe im a few days late with my post, but i think we need to trade Mason. if we dont its a huge mistake for several reasons. Clayton (who is our # 1 receiver) is the same thing as Mason, except younger- and no team needs2 posssession receivers who run good routes and have escapability. you need your other guy to be a tall/speedy deep threat thats (Williams- he is our # 2 guy) which leaves Mason an unhappy 3rd who could be a # 1 on many other squads. He is certain to be cut for cap reasons either next year or the following year anyway. i understand next year our cap situation is even much worse then it is this year. So get something for him- we dont need him at all. what we should have done was trade him to San Diego for LT's backup runningback, then we would still have those picks we lost for Mcgahhee (not that i dont like the aquisitiuon of Mcgahee, given that we will get a couple of those picks back due to free agents we lost last year and this year).
Posted by: thegr8estofalltyme | March 22, 2007 11:45 AM
No, Mr Preston wrote Mac was HOLDING OF on taking meds for dis-n-dat. Just sayin. I 'met' Mac once on his (accompanied) way in at Owings Mills Mall, and the bestest favor I could do him was to just leave him and his lady 'lone. The man needs to write a book. What is it about Arizona?
Posted by: T-Sir98, a svelte bird | March 22, 2007 7:11 PM
Goddell should make each individual franchise responsible for the pensions of their former players. League owners would probably be against such a move, but it makes perfect sense that the organizations that profited from a player over the years should foot some of the bill for his post career care.
Posted by: Chris | March 23, 2007 7:27 PM
The NFL is going to examine the rules of overtime in the hopes to give the team that wins the coin toss a tough time to win the game. 65% of the time, the team that wins the coin toss, wins the game. They say they will move the kickoff back 5 yards. Thats all...
I like college overtime a lot better.
Posted by: Brad | March 24, 2007 5:47 PM
If we are to truly treat professional athletes as men and not disposable slabs of meat running around for our enjoyment, then shouldn't we assume they've made a conscious decision to enter their chosen profession? And, like any of us, are they not aware of the short and long-term implications of their career choice? If they wanted a job with a better pension plan, why didn't they apply at the closest General Motors plant? I don't hear these guys sticking up for us fans when tickets prices and concessions are constantly raised. I have no sympathy for people who happily reap the fame and rewards that come with being a professional athlete, then, once their playing days are done, cry about how badly they were taken advantage of. These are not indentured servants; they're adults making conscious career choices in a free society.
Posted by: Marc | March 25, 2007 9:36 AM
Perhaps nowhere else does the NFL better reflect American society than in the base display of greed that accompanies the League's glorification of money. The pathetic attempts by players from a bygone era for a piece of the billion dollar pie are almost as difficult to stomach as the excuses offered by the current golden boys of the gridiron. The weak, greedy justifications set forth by the modern NFL are reminisent of the social battles that took place at the turn of the century.
Jack London's Iron Heel, a social commentary on the economic injustices of the Gilded Age, could just as easily describe the battle between the old and new NFL. London's description of Jackson (see Herb Adderly), the workman whose arm was mangled when caught in a machine, perfectly describes the plight of some of the old guys: "I found Jackson a meek and lowly man...[with a] note of the nascent bitterness within him. They might-a given me a job as a watchman". The excuses offered by Smith, the foreman of the Mill , are close to the League's and Union's current unstated rationale: "...there were many accidents (injuries) in the Mills (games) and [our] policy is to fight to the bitter end [any attempt to pay the old guys]".
The refusal of the current players (and owners) to help the old guys is really no different that the injustices of Enron and its ilk, the increasingly unequal distribution of income between the haves and have-nots in our country and the inequality in social class throughout the United States today and in the past.
Posted by: Rob from Ellicott City | March 31, 2007 8:56 PM