In case you missed it, Guthrie is still an Oriole (and L.J. Hoes note)
On Sunday, July 24, my colleague Jeff Zrebiec based his game story around the fact that it could have been Jeremy Guthrie’s last start at Camden Yards as an Oriole.
On Friday, I based my game story from Yankee Stadium on what might have been Guthrie’s last start in his Orioles career.
Well, looks like we are going to have to get a new angle. At least until the end of September.
Guthrie wasn’t dealt at Sunday’s nonwaiver trade deadline. Orioles president of baseball operations Andy MacPhail said he had inquiries but teams weren’t willing to give back the quality pitching that the Orioles desired.
“I had no shortage of interest. One of the elements for us to consider moving a talent like Jeremy was we would have to feel like we were getting some pitching back. And that’s a tall order for clubs. They are reluctant to part with it,” MacPhail said. “We probably could have gotten reasonable talent back, but not as much back in the pitching category that we needed to have to satisfy us.”
Because he is a competent big league starter, Guthrie is unlikely to pass through trade waivers, so the club won’t be dealing him in August. That means he almost certainly will finish this season as an Oriole.
That’s not a surprise to Guthrie.
“There’s no relief. It never crossed my mind,” Guthrie said Sunday. “I feel like I have a relatively decent understanding of how the game works, and I felt for months now that it wasn’t something I should concern myself with and it wasn’t going to be something that was likely to happen.”
It’s possible, of course, that Guthrie trade talks resume this winter. That’s when teams, typically, pay the most for starting pitching, since they are formulating their rotations for the next year (as opposed to July, when contenders are looking to fill short-term holes).
Guthrie is arbitration-eligible at the end of this season and is a free agent after 2012. So there was no rush to make a move. But if the Orioles don’t think they can compete next season and don’t think they can re-sign Guthrie the following winter, then they may be more motivated to move him.
Until then, Guthrie is an Oriole. And he is pitching Wednesday against Kansas City, which most definitely will be his last start in Missouri this year.
One other Orioles note: Double-A Bowie’s L.J. Hoes was named Eastern League Player of the Week on Monday. Hoes hit .462 (12-26) for the week with one double, four home runs and seven RBIs while also scoring seven runs. In 61 games with Double-A Bowie this season, Hoes is batting .318 (71-223) with 11 doubles, four home runs, 35 RBIs, 29 runs and 13 stolen bases in 17 attempts.








Comments
Forgive my ignorance, Dan, but what position does Hoes play?
...............................................................................................
He's been mostly a 2B since the Orioles signed him, but he's playing a lot of left field lately.
Posted by: RJH9er | August 1, 2011 9:22 PM
Yeah, as a 2B he was very exciting; as a LF his numbers are less exciting. This flash of power is interesting, though.
Good to have some good news for once!
Why did we get a 1B in the low minors from the Lee trade? Don't we have Mahoney and Townsend down there? I mean, maybe those guys aren't great, but it seems sort of pointless. Maybe we could have scored at least a guy with backup catcher potential or something in this deal.
Posted by: Orsulakfan | August 1, 2011 10:53 PM
"Flash of power" indeed--those four HRs, which Hoes hit in two games [two each], are the ONLY HRs he has for Bowie, and he hit only three [in 158 ABs] for Frederick before that. And does anyone know where the "LJ" comes from--his given name is Jerome O'Brian Hoes?
Posted by: Marlowe17 | August 1, 2011 11:27 PM
It's possible that his father was also Jerome, and he ended up with the nickname of "Little Jerome" or "LJ"
Posted by: josh | August 2, 2011 7:10 AM
I saw Hoes when he played for Salisbury (Delmarva). His range as a 2B was exceptional and he took some base hits away from guys who had poked the ball past the 1B. Given the O's 2B situation, I wonder why he has been moved to LF.
--
There were concerns about his second-base defense as he moved up the system.
Posted by: rphall | August 2, 2011 11:08 AM