« Maryland not fretting over disputed call | Main | UMBC at Towson: Three things to watch »

Q&A with CBS College Sports' Matt Danowski

Matt Danowski is a former four-time All-American attackman at Duke who won the 2007 Tewaaraton Trophy. The newest lacrosse analyst for CBS College Sports, Danowski shared his opinion on a variety of topics. Here is the first of a two-part interview.


Question: What would you say are No. 5 Maryland’s chances of making the Final Four?

Matt Danowski: “I think they have a really strong chance to do that. Coming back against arguably the best team in the country [against No. 1 Virginia Saturday night] is a good sign. I think it’s a win without getting the win against that team. They’re very talented offensively with [senior attackman Will] Yeatman, [junior attackman Ryan] Young, [junior attackman Travis] Reed, [junior attackman Grant] Catalino, and some pretty good middies. Defensively, they’re always good. Now it’s just mentally getting over that hump.”

Q: What’s the one thing Maryland could improve to be a stronger candidate?

MD: “It’s hard to say. Each match-up brings a different mindset. But if anything, I think they should be more aggressive offensively. Sometimes, they kind of slow down the ball a bit. They have a ton of playmakers, but sometimes they’re not aggressive enough in going to the cage, going on the fly, and playing offense.”

Q: What’s your impression of No. 7 Loyola?

MD: “I haven’t had a chance to watch much of Loyola this year, but from what I know from watching them last year and from what I’ve read, they have a great shooter in [senior attackman] Cooper [MacDonnell] and a playmaker in [senior attackman] Collin Finnerty. With them, I think it comes down to whether they have enough horses in the midfield. When it comes down to the playoffs and the Final Four, your midfield can take you and lead you to that championship game.”

Q: In your opinion, what’s been plaguing No. 15 Johns Hopkins?

MD: “To me, it just seems like defensively – which I always think they’re unbelievable at – they’re just not on the same page. But to me, I never count Johns Hopkins out. Coach Petro [Dave Pietramala] has proven himself to be one of the best coaches in the game, and he can make adjustments with the best of them and figure out how to get that team above .500 and into the playoffs.”

Q: Johns Hopkins has scored just 26 goals in the last four games. Have opponents figured out how to contain the Blue Jays offense?

MD: “I don’t know if I would say that. I think they have some very capable freshmen in [midfielders John] Greeley and [John] Ranagan. I just think they need time to develop. [Senior] Michael Kimmel is one of the best middies in the country, [junior attackman] Kyle Wharton’s a great shooter, and [senior attackman] Steven Boyle is a dynamic dodger from behind the cage. So I think they have all the components there. They just have to get on the same page, and you never know what that can take. Maybe one day, it just clicks. But I think they have all the components to be a playoff team, and once you get into the playoffs, it’s only a couple of wins before you get to the Final Four.”

Posted by Edward Lee at 7:00 AM | | Comments (3)
Categories: Johns Hopkins, Loyola, Maryland


A lot of the Hopkins faithful are concerned that the team is over-coached - paticularly on offense. Hopkins has never been a run and gun system, but you can almost feel the reigns being put on the group. There's no joy or creativity on the field, and a lot of people I know think it's because the players don't have enough room to make their own decisions and react to what's happening around them.

Pietramala is a control freak, who doesn't seem like he's able to let go and trust his kids to play. Plus he doesn't seem to enjoy the games themselves, instead just wanting to get into his own routine and get the games over with. The result is a game that's not played the way lacrosse is meant to be played. I hate Syracuse, but I have a lot of respect for Coach John Desko, because I love the way the Orange play, and the way that he allows his team to PLAY lacrosse, even if they make mistakes, because he knows they'll get more chances. At Hopkins, if you make a mistake, another chance might not come, because, with the slow down strategy that the team employs on offense, the Jays just don't get many chances to score. I don't like that style of play because I think the essence of the game is to put so much pressure, all the time, on the other team that you force them to make the mistakes and crumble. How often do you see a game in which Hopkins does that?

Personally, I agree with much of the 2 previous posts. However, looking to MD's comments, one spark and who knows with this club. Having all the parts doesn't make a motor run or run to peak performance.
The Orange and Va recruit for speed and athleticism and it shows. Take nothing away from them.
I want Hop to turn loose and fly but I'm no taking heat if they lose and I'm not repsonsible for disasters, either.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please enter the letter "s" in the field below:
About Faceoff
Faceoff is The Baltimore Sun's blog devoted to college and high school lacrosse. Faceoff contributors include Sun reporters Edward Lee, Mike Preston and Katherine Dunn.

Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local sports alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local sports text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Photo galleries
Blog updates
Recent updates to sports blogs  Subscribe to this feed