Consider taking Manning high
Welcome aboard to the new fantasy sports blog for baltimoresun.com. Well, it's not exactly new -- the plot will be similar but the characters have changed.
My name is Dave Golokhov and I'll be your fantasy sports big brother for the next while. To get started, let's stir some controversy.
In virtually every fantasy football league, there's always one owner who is looking to do what the Miami Dolphins did during the first-round of the 2007 NFL Draft: pull a shocker.
Maybe he's crazy, maybe he's attention-starved, but maybe -- just maybe -- he's shrewd.
Here's a theory that will have you thinking that I fall into one of those three categories:
We know that LaDainian Tomlinson is the top take of the draft, but from the second pick on, consider taking Peyton Manning.
First of all, let's establish that Manning is head and shoulders above the rest of the quarterbacks.
Manning is a stud to begin with but you have to factor a number of changes on the roster that point to this being his best statistical season to date.
On defense, the Indianapolis Colts have lost two starting cornerbacks (Nick Harper and Jason David) and an outside linebacker (Cato June) to free agency. Stud defensive tackle, Anthony McFarland, who helped shore up the run defense in the playoffs, is injured long term. Throw in a severe lack of depth all the way around and it is plain to see that the Colts defense, which allowed a league-worst 173 rushing yards-per-game a season ago, is worse off.
When the defense drops the ball, you know who has to pick it up.
On offense, time-controlling runner, Dominic Rhodes, has defected to Oakland, which could lead to even less running this year.
That means the scoring burden falls on the shoulders of Manning and the thought of that will have his fantasy owners salivating.
The second reason you should consider Manning so early is that this year, more than in either of the last two fantasy seasons, there is so much depth at the running back position.
In a 10-team league, there will be 16 picks by the time you take Manning second overall and the clock comes back to you in the second round. Assuming every single owner takes a back, here is who still projects to be available:
Cedric Benson, Cadillac Williams, Ahman Green, Edgerrin James and Brandon Jacobs.
You'll also have an early pick in the third round, which means you can either beat the rush on wide receivers or grab a second running back.
Here's is what it boils down to: would you rather the top quarterback (Manning) and two second-tier running backs or would you rather an A-list running back, a B-list running back and a B-list quarterback.
It's an interesting model.
My theory heading into drafts this year will be to take Manning as early as the second pick, depending on the size of the pool.
With eight owners or less, I would take Manning second because with less picks in between, I won't be so concerned about getting a quality back in the second round. With 10 or more people in the pool, I would value Steven Jackson higher in the second slot and only take Manning from the third spot and beyond.
Manning's average draft position is 5.8 right now, so taking him a few spots higher isn't necessarily crazy or a cry for attention; I would call it shrewd.
--Dave Golokhov


Comments
Thanks for this entry. It helps me feel a little better about taking Manning at 5 last night. In our league last year he was second in total scoring to LT. Third in 06 scoring was Drew Brees who was taken with the 6th pick - now that was a shocker, but it was fun since folks got nervy and QB's started flying off the board.
Posted by: brooksflow | August 23, 2007 11:41 AM
ALWAYS take a RB with your first pick!
But I would take Manning with my 2nd pick. The RBs in that range are always risky.
Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2007 12:06 PM
One thing you should mention is that you have to consider the depth of your league before you advocate taking Manning early. More frequently, I’m seeing deeper leagues now – I’m talking 16-20 teams deep. If you’re not taking a RB with your first two picks, you’re risking missing out on big points at a crucial position, whereas letting some other guy leap for Peyton early will leave you comparable options like Marc Bulger, Carson Palmer or Tom Brady.
There are also other ways to benefit from Peyton’s brilliance without wasting a top pick on him; consider a late flyer on Anthony Gonzalez, especially those of you in keeper/dynasty leagues. He’ll slide right into Brandon Stokely’s role but I see him doing it better. You can’t go wrong with Indy receivers in general, really, just not too early. But what I’m trying to drive home is that the way to win a league, with all due respect to the writer, isn’t by wasting a RB pick on a QB early; there are just too many options at QB and you can’t have enough depth at RB, especially if you’re smart enough to handcuff your stud #1 RB.
Posted by: Dave | August 23, 2007 2:59 PM
Agreed, Dave, about the specificities of the rules, roster sizes, and number of teams in regards of what to take where. But in a standard 10 team league taking Manning early is a good move. Handcuffing in any almost situation, however, is a completely overrated strategy. The Morris boys (Sammy and Maurice) didn't exactly help owners of Ronnie Brown and Shuan Alexander last year. The only cuff that may have benefitted owners last year was Ladell Betts for Clinton Portis, and if someone says they had the foresight to actually draft Betts I'd accuse them of lying.
Posted by: brooksflow | August 23, 2007 9:42 PM
Dave,
Taking Manning (4-8) is certainly a good idea, but for different reasons than you list.
The Colts defense is well ahead of where it was last year. Depth does continue to be a concern, but the starters are actually much better than they were last year. Marlin Jackson and Kelvin Hayden are bigger corners with as much speed as Harper and David. These corners will help out on the run in the Tampa 2 defense much more than Harper did last year. Undrafted free agent Ed Johnson has been playing better so far at DT than anyone I've seen in a Colts uniform since Tony Siragusa. The Colts have a legitimate shot of being a top-10 defense this year.
Which will put the ball in Manning's hands much more than last year, when his touches were limited in many games as other teams ate up the clock with rushing yardage.
With an improved D and a new slot receiver in Gonzales, Manning should top 4,000 yards and 36 TD this year.
I don't see the loss of Rhodes as much of a factor, as Rhodes got only limited touches before last year, and Joseph Addai looks impressive so far this year. Addai has much more big play ability than Rhodes.
Posted by: Kyle Looper | August 27, 2007 2:51 PM