Neil Blumberg, Baltimore: We all knew this would be a rebuilding season for the Terps. Do you think they exceeded expectations or did not meet expectations?
Don Markus: A little of both. Given the way the season began, finishing with 19 wins and getting to the NIT was an accomplishment. But given the way the team played in January and early February, the Terps were disappointing.
Eric Cramer: Don, last year Gary coached his fourth best team at Maryland based on winning percentage. This year's team would rank 17th out of his 19 teams. I am having a hard time trying to figure if this team just underachieved at 19-15 and missed opportunities to finish with about 6 more wins of these 9 losses (VCU, BC twice, Va.Tech, Ohio, American, Missouri, UVa, Clemson). This team could have finished as well as last year's team if they played to their potential. Do you think this is the case or was this team just average and take it for it was?
Don Markus: As I stated previously, I think the expectations changed with the mid-season winning streak. But based on the whole season, I think it was an average team with average to below average talent. How many players will you be seeing in the NBA? Maybe Vasquez and Gist, and neither of them are locks to make it.
Big Bob: Donny, Will Gist or Osby be drafted in the NBA?
Don Markus: Gist might have a chance if he performs well at the pre-draft camps, but his stock went down toward the end of the season because of his inconsistent play. I think Gist has the ability to play in the NBA, but he needs to get stronger and learn to put the ball on the floor better than he does now. Osby is too small to play with his back to the basket in the NBA and doesn't have any kind of perimeter game. As hard as he works, and as good a guy as he is, Osby could have a long and productive career in Europe if he chooses to take that route. And by the way, did you grow up in Brooklyn? Only my friends from the old neighborhood call me Donny.
Andrew: My question is related to recruiting. It seems like five-to-ten years ago, whoever was evaluating talent for the Terps was finding diamonds in the rough like Joe Smith, Juan Dixon and Lonny Baxter on a consistent basis. Recently, that hasn't been so. Is Gary the main evaluator of talent or did the previous assistant coaches like Hahn and Patsos serve as the primary evaluators? Seems like the Terps have erred in their evaluations of who they should give scholarships the past few years. Thanks!
Don Markus: I think Billy Hahn and also Art Perry, who was the assistant responsible for finding and signing Joe Smith, had a lot more experience in finding the kind of players who fit Williams' system. Jimmy Patsos and Dave Dickerson evolved into pretty good recruiters as well. Williams was hoping that Rob Moxley was going to fill the void, but he went back to Charlotte after one year with the promise of becoming its next head coach after Bobby Lutz retired. Now the bulk of the recruiting has fallen on Chuck Driesell and Keith Booth, as well as Joe Harrington. Harrington was a great recruiter when he was an assistant and later a head coach, so it might pick up the next couple of years as Driesell and Booth get experience. Booth had his first big get with Sean Mosley, and the former Terps star could be the key guy getting talent out of Baltimore. In other words, Williams leaves a lot of responsibility to his assistants for recruiting, and that might have to change in the future,
Don: Who will be replacing Gist on the interior for Maryland next year? Do we have any "big men" who are decent players filling the inside roles?
Don Markus: Eventually, it will be Gus Gilchrist, who from all accounts was the best player in practice during the past couple of months. The other addition could be Ken Bowman, a 6-foot-9 banger who is playing with Bobby Maze at Hutchinson Community College in Kansas.
Michael Stefanek: Very disappointing year...any projections for the starting five next year, and the idea of going more with a three-guard offense, which would include newcomer Mosley?
Don Markus: I think Gary is going to go with a lot of three-guard lineups, especially at the start of next season, to get enough offense on the floor. If Mosley is as good as advertised, I can see him playing a lot of minutes at the 2 or the 3. I also think Vasquez is going to see more time at the 2 if either Adrian Bowie or Bobby Maze can play significant minutes at the point. I think the odd-man out will be Eric Hayes, who is rumored to be thinking about going elsewhere. As for the starting lineup, the early season lineup (before Gus Gilchrist is eligible) could be PG: Vasquez SG: Mosley SF: Milbourne PF: Braxton Dupree or Ken Bowman (JC recruit) C: Jerome Burney, or have one of the other guards instead of one of the bigs. After Gilchrist is eligible, it could be PG: Bowie or Maze SG: Vasquez SF: Mosley or Milbourne PF: Bowman or Dupree C: Gilchrist.
beas: With the additions of Augustus Gilchrist, Bobby Maze, and Sean Mosley, do you think the team will be better or worse next year? Also, do you see Gary going to a three or maybe even four-guard offense with Gist and Osby leaving?
Don Markus: I think the team should be a lot better, especially after Gilchrist becomes eligible. He is supposedly the closest thing Gary Williams has had to a one-and-done type player, and he will probably be there no more than 1 1/2 seasons. Maze started at Oklahoma as a freshman until he had a run-in with Jeff Capel. Mosley is one of the most prolific high school scorers Maryland has ever signed. The question is whether Vasquez is going to accept sharing the ball more with these guys than he did with this year's team. I think he will because I think he'll feel this new group will be able to score. I can see a three-guard lineup, but unless the Terps plan to move to the Patriot League (they were 2-1 against the PL this year), I doubt Gary will go to four guards.