Ehrlich would scrap Red Line, Purple Line light rail
The Sun's Julie Bykowicz reports from former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s small business round table in Montgomery County that the presumptive Republican challenger to Gov. Martin O"Malley would scrap the incumbent's proposals for light rail lines in Baltimore and the Washington suburbs.
Ehrlich told the group he go back to his plan for high-speed buses on the Purple Line in Montgomery and Prince George's counties and be "open to ideas" about Baltimore's Red Line. He said he would prefer to spend the money on the MARC commuter rail system and the Washington Metro -- not on these new light rail lines.
On an unrelated transportation matter, Ehrlich said he doesn't like the toll levels that have been approved for the Intercounty Connector, though he was not clear about whether or how he would change them. It was under Ehrlich's administration that the highway was approved as a toll road, though the actual rates were not set by the Maryland Transportation Authority until after a market study conducted under O'Malley.
In supporting rapid-bus service along the Purple Line, Ehrlich would be going against the preference of most local leaders in suburban Washington, where support for the Purple Line plan runs high in spite of a roughly $1.6 billion price tag.
The Red Line light rail plan has the strong support of Baltimore business and civic leaders but has aroused opposition in some neighborhoods, including Canton and Edmondson Village, where plans call for it to run on surface streets.The cost of that plan was recently revised up to roughly $1.8 billion.
The state has applied to the federal government for funding of the two transit lines as light rail projects. If approved, the federal share of the cost would likely be 50 percent -- leaving Maryland to raise the other half. The O'Malley administration has put off any decision on funding until its hears from the Federal Transit Administration on whether it will approve either project.
On the ICC tolls, Ehrlich could face a dilemma if he wins the election. If ICC tolls are cut, largely for the benefit of Washington-area users, it is not clear how the transportation authority could make up the lost revenue without raising tolls at its existing toll facilities -- including those in the Baltimore area.







Comments
Revoke the tolls and forget innovation for public transportation. Sounds like an Ehrlich plan alright. Let's also reduce taxes while keeping spending levels stable or at a slight increase. Let the next guy figure out how to get re-elected. Old Bob is the quintessential politician!
Posted by: Jman | May 18, 2010 5:51 PM
In response to Jman, how about if we just keep spending and raise taxes so we can keep spending and let the next guy figure out how to better the economy in MD? People can't afford to retire in MD anymore. "Old Bob" tried to get the slot bill passed to help relieve the burden of the taxpayers and the democrats didn't want to hear of it. Once O'Malley got in, IT PASSED. hmmmmmmm And now he's raising tolls and cutting services....
Posted by: cham | May 18, 2010 8:37 PM
Finally, common sense on the RedLine. This project whose time has passed needs to be downgraded below MARC improvements immediately. Getting baltimoreans to the jobs of the future- the jobs in Aberdeen, Ft Meade and Washington DC- needs to be the State's mass transit priority. A true multi modal West Baltimore station with sufficent rolling stock to have trains stop there throughout the day will do more for West Baltimore than a "tunnel to nowhere"
Posted by: telecommutenow | May 19, 2010 8:38 AM
None of this is shocking. Even if you don't like the Red Line as it is currently configured (I prefer a subway option, not a clunky light rail), its clear that Ehrlich will gut transit on all levels and be a disaster for Maryland (again!). Excepting, of course, for the wealthy people who ride the DC Metro (average income of DC Metro rider - 100k a year) and the suburban commuters who ride MARC. Ehrlich is a typical Baltimore County conservative - any chance he can take to hurt Baltimore City, he'll take it.
Posted by: Rich | May 19, 2010 9:12 AM
Wow, a Republican who opposes public transit in favor of toll-free, but massively subsidized suburban highways. What a surprise.
Posted by: Dan | May 19, 2010 9:37 AM
The man's a menace.
We need the Purple Line a whole heck of a lot more than we need the ICC. He talks about funding the Metro but he'd make Governor O'Malley's un-cute games this spring with WMATA funding seem like child's play.
He's against the Purple Line because he receives a ton of campaign contributions from the Columbia Country Club, which grew around the Purple Line right-of-way and opposes the train. This is despite the fact that the right-of-way was there first.
Posted by: Cavan | May 19, 2010 10:06 AM
All of this needs to be looked at again. The Demographics, population and commuters might better be served differently. The city already has MTA buses to get crosstown. Why not tap all that revenue of the Shrewsberry crowd of commuters. Extend the Light Rail to PA. I agree with the person about Aberdeen, Edgewood, Meade etc. 40,000 employees expected ! Maybe another route included to Hopkins besides the current Metro situation and other medical facilities since they now seem to be the bigger employers and having the most customers.
Posted by: TD | May 19, 2010 10:33 AM
He wants to put money into the MARC system, which as it runs doesn't benefit Baltimore at all. The red line will atleast help people who live in Baltimore and work here get to our jobs.
I think people don't realize that the sections of the light rail that are underground (4 miles), elevated (1 mile), or grade separated (west of Cooks Lane and east of Canton) will be able to move at 55 MPH. Double tracking the Cooks Lane tunnel will also shave a few minutes on travel time.
Posted by: Chris | May 19, 2010 10:34 AM
Stealing from the poor to give to the rich.
Posted by: Jed | May 19, 2010 12:59 PM
@ Rich
Thats a lie. Most people who ride metrorail in the DC area does not earn that much money. A good portion maybe but people of ALL income levels ride the subway here, from low/working class to Rich. Unless you give a legit source for that claim then it is indeed invalid.
Posted by: Anonymous | May 19, 2010 4:09 PM
Stale, old, worn out ideas. This is leadership?
Posted by: Steven | May 19, 2010 5:55 PM
Cham - I guess I don't understand your argument. The entire country has faced economic trouble the past few years and MD has fared pretty well by comparison. You also talk about raising taxes and continuing to spend money but you use the current Gov as an example of raising taxes and cutting services. Yes, that is called governing and making tough choices. Something Ehrlich did not do while he was in office. He merely pushed it down the road. That seems to be the M.O. of Republican politicians.
Also, people can't afford to retire in MD? Really, what do you base that on? They may choose to retire somewhere else but that doesn't mean that people who have been smart with money can't afford to retire in MD.
Posted by: Jman | May 19, 2010 6:10 PM
What a surprise! Bobby Haircut wants to get rid of something that will benefit the city, only so he can keep bashing Baltimore.
Hey, Bob. Do you want to get rid of the IRL Race next year? Because that'll benefit the city too! How about the Charm City Circulator, which has relieved traffic in the city and exceeded rider expectations?
Posted by: Neil | May 19, 2010 9:22 PM
Howabout we improve public transportation, saving money on street repair because of fewer cars on them. How about we make people who have free rides pay taxes, like the people who bought houses in Baltimore City and got a tax waiver because the house was old. How about we remember why we booted Ehrlich in the first place!
Posted by: candylyn | May 20, 2010 4:06 PM
"Stealing from the poor to give to the rich"
What a crock. The current way things are in Maryland is stealing from the working class to give to the lazy who refuse to get a job.
Posted by: rgh | May 20, 2010 4:30 PM
Light rail suck, they should scrap those plans, who wants to share the road with trains. Monorail is the way to go, this is what should have been done with Baltimore's light rail line and it should be done for all of these proposed projects. Up in the air and cheaper to build, you are out of the way of cars and pedestrians and avoid costly costly tunneling.
Posted by: Dave | May 20, 2010 5:17 PM
I can explain in one word how Ehrlich plans to make up the diffeence:
FEES!!
See, he likes to say he's against tax increases and for lower spending. But then he seems to love these big ticket spending things. When it comes time to pa for them he shrugs his shoulders and institutes another fee. Most of us would call this a tax, but he thinks if he changes the name of something else, we won't notice.
Like we wouldn't notice his 6.6% annual spending increases with taxes, excuse me... FEES, increasing accordingly.
Slick Bobby won't be straight with us.
Posted by: IPFrehley | May 20, 2010 8:02 PM
Build high speed MARC, more MARC capacity and frequency, the red line, and the purple line.
The future is transit where people can use transit time to work on trains and be economically productive from laptops and smart devices.
The Chinese will be building their super power going 200mph on trains and working simultaneously, while we end up sitting in traffic, consuming foreign oil and eroding our economic competitiveness.
Posted by: JL | May 20, 2010 11:16 PM
Mike,
Business and civic leaders may be for the Purple and Red lines in Washington and Baltimore respectively, but the federal money just isn't there. Read FTA Administrator Peter Rogoff's speech: "At times like these, it's more important than ever to have the courage to ask a hard question: if you can't afford to operate the system you have, why does it make sense for us to partner in your expansion?"
Posted by: Ken Orski | May 21, 2010 9:10 AM
Ken,
Rogoff's statement infuriates me. We can't afford to operate highways, yet we continue to build them and raid general funds to operate them.
Transit is not going to break-even or make a profit. It needs to be treated as a basic human need/service in cities, and we need to get off of the messaging that it needs to be profitable. Highways never have been, and user taxes and fees don't begin to cover the costs.
Posted by: Jed | May 24, 2010 11:03 AM
My comment is in reference to the suggested scrapping of the Red Line only.
There are few things more frustrating than politicians/citizens who criticize without offering productive solutions.
A prospective governor being "open to ideas" is the minimum we should expect from someone who wishes to lead our state.
Posted by: James Edwards | May 25, 2010 4:47 PM