Ban on reading text message while driving fails
In the arcane world of the Maryland General Assembly, there's a key distinction between a bill being "done" and a bill being "done-done."
The bill that would have extended last year's ban on texting while driving to reading incoming text messages got done. It was passed by both houses of the legislature. But it never got done-done -- passed in the same form by the House and the Senate. Thus, it failed.
The hang-up came when the Senate added amendments on the final evening of the session and the House would not agree. The differences weren't that great, but the conference committee either couldn't get around to meeting or failed to agree before midnight brough adjournment sine die.
It's a bit ironic that this bill would fail and the much more sweeping ban on the use of hand-held cell phones while driving would pass. Going into the session, the relatively modest extension of last yearr's texting ban would have seemed to be much more likely to pass. But strange things happen in Annapolis on sine die. All it takes to sink a bill that had seemed to be a lock is the adoption of one amendment on the last day.
Unfortunately, we had a mistake in this morning Sun where we mistook done for done-done. We regret the error.







Comments
Not that it matters now, but here's a question about the attempted ban - how would it be enforced given that a smart phone user trying to make a phone call could look like they are texting (eg. looking at a screen, scrolling, typing)? I agree such a ban is needed, but if i'm calling a non-speed dial number, it could look like i'm texting when I'm using the phone.
Posted by: mobtown | April 15, 2010 11:30 AM