baltimoresun.com

« Baltimore Metro compares well on speed | Main | MTA operator not fond of hybrids »

March 16, 2010

LaHood elevates biking, walking to parity with cars

Call it sacrilege. Call it radical. But U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has actually elevated the  bicycle and  the human foot to parity with the automobile in federal transportation policy.

On Monday, LaHood announced what could be -- if it is backed with actual dollars-and-cents policy -- a sea change from the auto-centric bias that has prevailed in federal transportation policy since World War II.

"People across America who value bicycling should have a voice when it comes to transportation planning. This is the end of favoring motorized transportation at the expense of non-motorized," he said. "We are integrating the needs of bicyclists in federally-funded road projects. We are discouraging transportation investments that negatively affect cyclists and pedestrians. And we are encouraging investments that go beyond the minimum requirements and provide facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities."

As part of this policy, LaHood said, the federal government will urge state departments of transportation to "treat walking and bicycling as equals with other transportation modes."

The WashCycle blog is calling LaHood's statement "simply the strongest statement of support for prioritizing bicycling and walking ever to come from a sitting secretary of transportation."

Thanks to Greater Greater Washington for iits coverage of what could be a landmark decision.

 

Posted by Michael Dresser at 5:41 PM | | Comments (11)
Categories: Bicycles
        

Comments

Great news! Since I have decided that a car-free life is what I wanted last year I love the lack of hassles, monetary outlay, and stress of having to drive. Walking or the MTA is how I get around town, but if you live in suburbia I imagine this is not always an option. Perhaps Mr. LaHood can improve this..

Hooray for Secretary LaHood.

Yes, happy motorists, there is life outside of your car.

Outstanding. Now let's see this backed up with results on the state and local levels as well.

Fantastic. Federal policy is being changed to the detriment of 99% of the commuters in order to benefit a small group of enthusiasts and hobbyists. In the end our infrastructure will suffer, more time will be wasted as people spend it sitting in traffic, and the environment will suffer as backed up cars spew more and more emissions into the atmosphere.

Thom, that's silly. All of us our pedestrians and need safe places to walk even if most of what we do is driving. Some people like the first poster choose to live car-free and. But, there are plenty of people who can't afford cars, or if they can afford them can't afford to drive them often so they walk and bike when they can. Many people rely on the MTA and they need good pedestrian facilities to take them to their final destination. Others take their bike on MTA and ride a few miles past the end of the line to get home.

Local taxes are the main source of funding for local roads. I bike, walk--and also drive--and I would not want all of my money only going towards car facilities that make my street less friendly and make it harder to walk the 8 blocks to the grocery store or bike the 2 miles to Lake Montebello. I also want to be able to drive and visit my family in upstate New York.

And it's silly to pretend you're the environmentalist because in some rare cases traffic doesn't route well around a cyclist or pedestrian. Where I lived in the suburbs I was actually closer (as the bird flies) to groceries and restaurants and salons and most everything than I am here in Baltimore. But 99% of people drove there. Why? because walking to the grocery store meant going onto Rt. 40 with intermittent sidewalks or cutting through a yard at the end of a cul-de-sac. There was always a ton of traffic and driving the 1/2 mile could take 10 minutes. In Baltimore the only time there is traffic in my neighborhood is when commuters from the suburbs come in the mornings and evenings. No idea what percentage of people walk but it's definitely greater than 25%. It's great not needing to use a car for short trips especially when it's quicker to walk or bike.

So, LaHood isn't asking you not to drive. He's asking you--and the states--to respect that there are tax paying citizens who might want to walk or bike and that you realize they are equally entitled to public space.

Have a great day :)

I quit cars 15 years ago and find my choices of where to live to be very limited in USA unlike Europe. I am very happy that the US may some day catch up with Europe with pedestrian/bike centered towns surrounded by country connected by frequent rail service.

Cheers to this.

More gas tax money going to non-highway use.....

Please don't complain about drivers, we're footing the bill for you.

Years ago my grocery store was across the street. Gas tax funds widened that street to a four-lane, plus two turn lanes, each direction highway, no crosswalk. Gas tax funds put to good use? Progress? I don't think so.

Anonymous, let's list the subsidies we have for cars. General fund infusions into the highway trust fund. General funds subsidizing car ownership. Local tax revenues being the vast majority of money spent on local roads. General state money being a large part of state road spending. General funds going towards road plowing budgets--not plowing sidewalks or bike lanes. General funds going to subsidize oil companies. General funds going to stormwater runoff issues caused by too much of America being paved for cars. Additional costs of goods when businesses have to raise prices to pay for their parking infrastructure. Local parking minimums which pass the cost of parking onto the community as a whole. The cost of the land in front of my house which has been reserved for parking and not some other use. The cost of land used for the road itself. The cost of particulate matter in our air produced from cars. The cost of remediation at oil refineries and abandoned gas stations. The cost to hospitals--public and private--of treating car crash victims who don't get reimbursed. The cost to the families. The cost to those living in the Baltimore neighborhoods east of I-83 or along the Franklin-Mulberry corridor.

So, please, let's not pretend that this is a one way stream from car drivers to subsidize bikers and pedestrians. It's not.

How much exercise or human contact does one get while driving a car? Walk or take a bike and open your eyes and ears to the world around your.

We are all pedestrians at some time, or should be for the good of the world, our community and ourselves.

THANK YOU Mr. LaHood, it is about time.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Michael Dresser
Michael Dresser has been an editor, reporter and columnist with The Sun longer than Baltimore's had a subway. He's covered retailing, telecommunications, state politics and wine. Since 2004, he's been The Sun's transportation writer. He lives in Ellicott City with his wife and travel companion, Cindy.

His Getting There column appears on Mondays. Mike's blog will be a forum for all who are interested in highways, transit and other transportation issues affecting Baltimore, Maryland and the region.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Live traffic updates
Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Traffic and commuting news Subscribe to this feed
Michael Dresser's Getting There column Subscribe to this feed
Michael Dresser How-Tos

How to avoid Delaware traveling north
Obscure third route between Baltimore, D.C.
Better routes for I-95 north
How to avoid the Bay Bridge
Find cheaper gas
Check prices at area gas stations by ZIP code and find the lowest rates in the region with our new interactive gas map.

Baltimore-area lowest gas prices
Historical gas price charts
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Breaking News newsletter
When a big news event breaks, we'll e-mail you the basics with links to up-to-date details.
Sign up

Charm City Current
Traffic Resources
Baltimore Metropolitan Council (Regional transportation planning)
Maryland Department of Transportation (State transportation policy)
Maryland Transit Administration (Buses, light rail, Metro, Mobility)
State Highway Administration (Maintains numbered routes)
Motor Vehicle Administration (Licenses, permits, rules of the road)
Maryland Transportation Authority (Toll bridges, tunnels and highways)
Maryland Aviation Administration (BWI and Martin Airport)
AAA Daily Fuel Gauge Report (Track Maryland average gas prices.)
MarylandGasPrices.com (Find the lowest and highest prices.)
SafeRoadMaps (Find out where the crashes happen.)
Roads to the Future (Scott M. Kozel on Mid-Atlantic infrastructure.)
WMATA (Washington metropolitan buses and Metro)
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (D.C. regional planning)
U.S. Department of Transportation (federal transportation policy)
Stay connected