Montgomery Council wants wider, not widest, I-270
David Alpert of Greater Greater Washington reports that the Montgomery County Council has reached an apparent consensus that a scaled-back plan to widen Interstate 270 between Shady Grove and Frederick is the way to go.
The council seems to like Chairman Phil Andrews plan to build two new reversible toll lanes -- southbound in the morning, northbound in the evening -- to relieve I-270's congestion, Alpert reports.
This is certainly less outrageous than the $4.6 billion plan to add four express toll lanes -- as the county planning board recommended. But it's still an other example of catering to the one-passenger car instead of seeking transit solutions.
What is disturbing about the report is the State Highway Administration announcing plans to build it in 30-40 sections before there has been a proper statewide discusiion of whether to build it and how to pay for it. Baltimore-area lawmakers need to ask questions sooner rather than later -- before their constituents end up paying the bill for a fait accompli.
Here's a counterproposal: A single, reversible lane for express buses only at peak times. (Let passenger vans use the lane to the extent there's extra capacity. Let trucks use it at off-peak hours as a safety measure.) Build it without toll financing when the state has sufficient transportation revenue to pay for it.
The best way to entice people out of cars is to present them with the sight of buses whizzing along in an uncongested lane while they sit in bumper-to-bumper misery.







Comments
Rather than extend a bus lane up I-270, why not extend the Metro Red Line in the same right of way?
It is not obvious which would cost less. Bus lanes would require ramps that would not be needed for a rail extension, A rail line could potentially be built on one side of the road, without disturbing the existing lanes, while safety considerations would likely require putting reversible roadway lanes in the center of the highway and relocating the existing lanes at great expense. Rail, on the other hand, needs stations. Only a professionally done planning study can begin to give us reliable cost numbers.
With its reversible lane plan, the Montgomery County Council has put a new yet-to-be-studied option into the mix. There is no reason not to study ACT's all-transit alternative at the same time as the reversible lanes are studied
Posted by: Ben Ross | November 11, 2009 11:14 AM