SHA answers questions (sort of) on I-270
Maryland Politics Watch reports that the State Highway Administration has provided the Montgomery County Council with a series of answers to the council's questions about a $4.6 billion proposal to widen Interstate 270 by two lanes in each direction between Shady Grove and Frederick.
The SHA letter is an elegant example of bureaucratic tiptoeing through a political minefield, and many of the answers are really non-answers. The message, if you read between the lines, is "we really don't want to talk about this yet." But -- surprise, surprise -- this highway agency doesn't see transit -- apart from one line called the Corridor Cities Transitway -- as a solution in the corridor.
The SHA answers carefully sidestep the question of using tolls at existing facilities to finance the I-270 expansion -- even though the council asks that very question. Give these highway folks credit -- they know political poison when the smell it.
The answer about GARVEE bonds points out a strategy that opponents of the project can use to keep it from getting off the ground -- persuade the General Assembly to just say no to any attempt to raise the debt limit for a single project. Committing a big chunk of future federal revenue to a single project benefiting a single corridor is contrary to the interest of every other part of the state.
MPW's Adam Pagnucco and I don't see eye to eye about all aspects of the project, but I certainly agree with his assessment that any attempt to raise the debt limit "guarantees some interesting politicking down the road."







Comments
Having read the full post on Maryland Politics Watch, I have to think the likely senario of this project is one that was brought up by the State - that it will be a long series of breakout projects rather than one massive push to build the corridor.
In a lot of ways, the I-95 ETL's are like that, section 200 for example that has seen improvements built at the MD 22 interchange in Aberdeen and now MD 24 in Abingdon. Doing some of the work before the full project (which will end up just being widening the road between the reconstructed interchanges) comes around. Or the Baltimore beltway northside where one by one the interchanges are being reconstructed to facilitate a possible 4th lane in each direction. I see 270 featuring interchange improvements at clarksburg and urbana, followed by widening from Germantown to Clarksburg, and then possibly a widening phase from Urbana to Frederick, before finishing the last middle section.
Posted by: Ben | October 27, 2009 8:55 AM