baltimoresun.com

« Eastbound backups expected on Bay Bridge | Main | Nearly 5,000 cancel E-ZPasses »

August 21, 2009

Wider I-270 would take 5 times more homes than ICC

Here's an interesting tidbit from the State Highway Administration's winter 2009 newsletter on the I270 corridor study: Widening the highway the way the Montgomery County Planning Board wants to do it would kick 251 families out of their homes.

That's right. This $4.6 billion boondoggle would confiscate five times more homes than the Inter-county Connector -- which has required a mere 47 "residential displacements" as tthey are kknown in transportation wonk-speak.

For context, the transit portion of the I-270 study -- known as the Corridor Cities Transiitway -- would take 5-9 homes. The proposed Red Line through the heart of Baltimore would take nobody's home.

The list of reasons for questioning this grandiose project just gets longer and longer the more one looks at it. I'm still waiting for an explanation of how it can be built without raising Baltimore-area tolls. I haven't heard anything yet. Anyone want to enlighten me?

 

 

Posted by Michael Dresser at 4:30 PM | | Comments (5)
Categories: On the roads
        

Comments

The volume of cars and trucks, people and products would dwarf the utility of the Corridor Cities Transitway. Further, the reason only about 50 homes was taken by the ICC was because it was planned for so long.

250 homes in the context of the 10s of thousands of homes in Montgomery County is what needs to be compared. The long term demands also need to be considered, which apparently you havent done.

One more thing that would reduce the demand on I-270 would be an additional river crossing to Virginia between American Legion Bridge and Point of Rocks.

Tom has it, the purpose of the I-270 widening is to increase the volume of traffic headed to clarksville in order meet the long-term needs of sprawl-oriented developers at the expense of the taxpayers. If the developers wanted to build compact transit-oriented communities, they would do it at one of the many properties available near pre-existing transit stations. If they didn't want to build sprawling auto-dependent communites, they wouldn't be building way out on the Clarkville frontier.

If more people get kicked out of their houses to widen the freeway to these new developments, then maybe they will consider buying into the new houses out in clarksville.

COMMENT: Lee, you're right on point but i think you're referring to Clarksburg, not Clarksville.

I've got news for everyone. The traffic is there already. It is ridiculous that the government cannot just serve the demand that is already there. Governments should not be in the business of punishing people for choosing to live where they want to live; they should merely react to the demand that exists.

Families are affected dramatically by the lack of capacity in I-270 everyday. The highway has needed to be expanded for over a decade. This project is an absolute necessity.... 270 has carried the worst traffic in the state for a long time; nothing in the Baltimore area even comes close.

Here Here t paine! Agree one hundred percent.

Dresser keep it up. The widening of 270 is being voisted on us by chamber of commerce types and developers who have only their own interests at heart. I'm an average, unemployed white guy in MOCO and I think this is a huge repoff. They should spend the money on rapid bus systems all over the county.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Michael Dresser
Michael Dresser has been an editor, reporter and columnist with The Sun longer than Baltimore's had a subway. He's covered retailing, telecommunications, state politics and wine. Since 2004, he's been The Sun's transportation writer. He lives in Ellicott City with his wife and travel companion, Cindy.

His Getting There column appears on Mondays. Mike's blog will be a forum for all who are interested in highways, transit and other transportation issues affecting Baltimore, Maryland and the region.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Live traffic updates
Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Traffic and commuting news Subscribe to this feed
Michael Dresser's Getting There column Subscribe to this feed
Michael Dresser How-Tos

How to avoid Delaware traveling north
Obscure third route between Baltimore, D.C.
Better routes for I-95 north
How to avoid the Bay Bridge
Find cheaper gas
Check prices at area gas stations by ZIP code and find the lowest rates in the region with our new interactive gas map.

Baltimore-area lowest gas prices
Historical gas price charts
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Breaking News newsletter
When a big news event breaks, we'll e-mail you the basics with links to up-to-date details.
Sign up

Charm City Current
Traffic Resources
Baltimore Metropolitan Council (Regional transportation planning)
Maryland Department of Transportation (State transportation policy)
Maryland Transit Administration (Buses, light rail, Metro, Mobility)
State Highway Administration (Maintains numbered routes)
Motor Vehicle Administration (Licenses, permits, rules of the road)
Maryland Transportation Authority (Toll bridges, tunnels and highways)
Maryland Aviation Administration (BWI and Martin Airport)
AAA Daily Fuel Gauge Report (Track Maryland average gas prices.)
MarylandGasPrices.com (Find the lowest and highest prices.)
SafeRoadMaps (Find out where the crashes happen.)
Roads to the Future (Scott M. Kozel on Mid-Atlantic infrastructure.)
WMATA (Washington metropolitan buses and Metro)
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (D.C. regional planning)
U.S. Department of Transportation (federal transportation policy)
Stay connected