Reader warns of irrational transit-phobia
Every once and a while I get an email that displays uncommon good sense in the face of nonsense. This, from Terry Shepard of Baltimore, is one of them. After passing along some compliments that are too extravagant to inflict on readers, Shepard writes concerning the June 22 Metro crash that killed nine in Washington:
The Sun and other papers continue to run follow-up stories on it and that is understandable. What is less explicable is the employment of this accident by some to spread fear of and opposition to public transit. Auto commuters say "See, that's why I don't ride transit" and even the Sun ran one of its reader polls on whether this would make people less likely to do so.
Meanwhile, a June 30 story in the Sun reports on "a tractor-trailer that plowed into stalled cars in a turnpike accident that killed 10 people" and no one is running polls or saying "See, that's why I don't drive on the highway." (I realize that crash was in Oklahoma, but you get the point.)
This despite the fact, reported in a June 24 story in the Sun, that: "According to the National Safety Council, the number of accident fatalities per vehicle miles traveled is about 14 times worse for passenger cars than trains and subways. Only transit buses are considered safer."
Perhaps you could repeat those statistics and interview a psychologist who works on transportation as to why people refuse to accept this (beyond the obvious answer that many Americans reject facts that suggest they should get out of their cars and ride on public transit with people they don't know.)
As you know and have argued, more and better mass transit are both possible and absolutely vital if we are to avoid killing our environment, our cities and ourselves. Americans must get past their unreasoning fear of transit and you can help them do it:
I have to disagree, Terry. If anyone, you are the one that can help them do it. And just have. Thanks.
I don't think you need a psychologist to explain what's at work: Transit is unfamiliar to most middle-class, auto-oriented Americans. Cars are something they encounter every day. That which is unfamiliar is more scary than what is familiar, even when the familiar is demonstrably more dangerous. Transit also involves contact with unfamiliar people.
The point on the poll is well-taken. It should be noted that it comes with the disclaimer: "results not scientific." Still, it is encouraging that only 17 percent answered yes. And I'm going to venture an unscientific guess that those most of those folks don't ride transit now.







Comments
I agree that a fear of public transportation is irrational. The media has always been able to provide a forum for those with the smallest minds. People want to trust and believe the news and what they see on TV or read in a paper or magazine. It is much easier than having to analyze and assess information from various sources.
There were a total of 24 passenger deaths in 2008 due to train collisions or derailments and only another 28 since 2000. In 2007 alone, the most current year with statistics, there were 37,248 deaths from motor vehicle crashes. Since 2000 a total of 345,000 people have died in motor vehicles compared to 52 on trains.
The most recent statistics on miles traveled show 1,041 million passenger rail miles in 2006 and 3,014,116 million highway miles. Using 2006 as an example, the numbers equate to .013 fatalities per million highway miles vs. .00096 fatalities per million passenger rail miles. You are 13.5 times more likely to die in a motor vehicle crash than a train crash.
Please stop publishing idiot polls that have no real data or analysis and use your influence to actually educate people. The world will be a much better place.
Posted by: Chester Vlasic | July 6, 2009 11:55 AM