Baltimore drivers rank 2nd from worst -- out of 193
Allstate's ranking of drivers in 193 metropolitan areas puts Baltimore motorists as second from worst -- behind only Washington.
The insurance giant found that Baltimore drivers had an 80 percent greater likelihood of ending up in a collision than the typical American driver in the study. Washington's drivers had an 95 percent greater likelihood.
In No. 1 Sioux Falls, S.D., drivers were 26 percent less likely to be in an accident than the the typical driver.
In Sioux Falls, drivers went an average of 13.5 years between collisions. In Baltimore, the average was 5.6 years; in Washington, 5.1 years. For Baltimore, that represents a significantly worse performance than in 2005, when the typical Baltimore driver could expect to go 6.5 years between collisions.






Comments
I am not surpised considering the extreme indifference Baltimore drivers exhibit toward the use of turn signals, the practice of spontaneous double parking and their prediliction for 'taking their half out of the middle of the road'.
Posted by: Michael K | July 9, 2009 1:30 PM
I am very surprised. I find it highly unlikely that there could be another city with drivers worse than those in Baltimore.
Posted by: Tim | July 9, 2009 1:41 PM
A fundamental problem must be the complete lack of regard for stop lights. I've never seen a city where so many blatantly run red lights. I'm hoping that the city starts installing red-light cameras almost everywhere; good for the city budget and good for the safety of her citizens.
Posted by: GSP | July 9, 2009 1:46 PM
not suprised either. can't tell you how many times a day I witness people running red lights , and not just one driver ,but 3-5 of them all in a line going through an intersection when I have the green light.
Posted by: mike | July 9, 2009 1:48 PM
I think tickets should be given to those who are too lazy to park in an open space (intentional) and sit in the travel lane just to talk to people they see on the street. Anyone agree?
Posted by: kevin | July 9, 2009 3:41 PM
I drive the 95's every day in Baltimore. It's like playing Russian roulette. Amazed that we're not #1
Posted by: Robert | July 9, 2009 3:57 PM
I am not surprised. I have seen motorists make illegal turns, run stop signs and red signals, and speeding. However, I've seen it done all in the presence of a police car.
Posted by: Deb Harris | July 9, 2009 4:12 PM
It is outright dangerous to drive in Baltimore City. Unfortunately, I have to anticipate the lawless and erratic driving of others such as red light running.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 9, 2009 8:39 PM
It's the overall lack of enforcement that creates these numbers. People will do anything if they know they can get away with it.
I've noticed the latest trend in arrogance is the yield, people don't yield, or they think the drivers on the thru road should yield to them, but they just come on out. Look out for me!
Posted by: Doug Ebbert | July 10, 2009 8:04 AM
The Allstate study is JUNK! If you read their "little" press release, all the way down in the fine print, you'll see the disclaimer that says: "The Allstate data excludes cities in the state of Massachusetts". There were also some backwater areas that Allstate excluded from their data pool.
I might point out that, consequently, data on Bostonian drivers are excluded. And everyone knows that Boston drivers are the absolute worst in the nation, so that put Baltimore easily as only the **3rd** worst.
Also interesting to note that the data seem to be limited to city limits rather than Metropolitan Statistical Areas. We know this because Washington DC is rated the city with the worst drivers, while Alexandria VA - what 5 miles away? - is the boasts the most improved drivers. So if you live in Arbutus or Pikesville, take heart, Allstate isn't calling you out. But keep that in mind when they try to raise your rates anyway simply as a result of their findings.
Posted by: Pete | July 10, 2009 9:17 AM
I believe Boston is excluded because Massachusetts drivers are so pathetic that Allstate does not insure anyone residing in the state, therefore no information is available.
Posted by: Smirkman | July 10, 2009 11:18 AM
I believe Boston is excluded because Massachusetts drivers are so pathetic that Allstate does not insure anyone residing in the state, therefore no information is available.
Posted by: Smirkman | July 10, 2009 11:19 AM
As a bicyclist I find this truly terrifying
Posted by: Lucy | October 13, 2009 8:03 PM