baltimoresun.com

« Buy back programs: Buy. Sell. Repeat. | Main | Watch the Royal Wedding at work without getting busted »

March 14, 2011

Real or fake? iPhone hacker takes over screens in Times Square

This is cool -- if it's real.

An unidentified man walks us through how he supposedly hijacks video screens around Times Square in New York City using an iPhone hack. It's pretty fascinating -- but is it a hoax?



[Spotted on Momentum blog, via Techmeme.]


This is an archived version of the technology blog. For updated coverage, see the current baltTech location: baltimoresun.com/balttech
Posted by Gus Sentementes at 2:30 PM | | Comments (2)
Categories: Geeks
        

Comments

I work with video on a daily basis. I'm also a registered iPhone developer and I can without a doubt say this video is fake. Beyond the fact that even if there were API calls (or a library) that allowed you to pipe video thru the microphone port, it's a low bandwidth port and couldnt sustain the data rate. A more convincing video would have used the data port or even iPhone 4.3 os' airstream ability. I am not even going into the obvious problems with how the video upconverts and displays with "glitches" that conveniently look cool but are a 100% giveaway as the screen is not rendered like that.

Very good points, Jim. I didn't think about the iPhone's inability to send video through the headphone jack. -gs

So yeahh.. This video is a hoax. The iPhone is incapable of streaming video from the headphone port. The iPod classic however can. BUT. The transmission power of that microchip would be extremely limited. Also, I can pretty safely say that next to none of those screens are updated wirelessly. And if they were, there would be firewalls to prevent exactly what was shown here in fear of a public scandal and lawsuit. So, this guy's makeshift "video hacker" would need to be able to break complex algorithms in a matter of seconds based on its proximity to said firewalls and video source. ALSO; This transmitter would (if capable of the previously stated) have to be able to use the computer/screen's insulated wire/circuitry to be a receiver for this "piggybacked" video signal. (nearly impossible).

So... in conclusion. No. Not possible

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Gus G. Sentementes
Gus G. Sentementes (@gussent on Twitter) has been writing for The Baltimore Sun since 2000. He's covered real estate, business, prisons, and suburban and Baltimore City crime and cops. He was one of the first reporters at The Sun to use multimedia tools and Web applications -- a video camera, an iPhone -- to cover breaking news. He hopes to cover Maryland geeks and the gadgets and Web sites they build, and learn -- and share -- something new every day.

Gus has a wife, a young daughter and two feuding cats. They live in Northeast Baltimore.
This is an archived version of the technology blog. For updated coverage, see the current baltTech location: baltimoresun.com/balttech
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected