by Matthew Hay Brown
In his weekly radio address this morning, President Bush sees a “turnaround” in Iraq. Rep. John Yarmuth takes a different view.
“Americans have already endured enormous losses in Iraq,” the Kentucky Democrat says in this morning’s Democratic radio address. “More than 4,000 troops have given their lives in battle and the American people have spent more than half a trillion dollars to prolong our presence there. …
“Next week, the American people will once again be reminded of the cost of this war. As April 15th approaches, millions of our hard-working citizens will pay their taxes knowing full well that their hard-earned dollars will be shipped to Iraq rather than invested here at home.”
It’s the economic argument against the war developed by Democrats who have toned down their criticism of the conduct of the war in the wake of the widely acknowledged military gains of Bush’s troop surge. And it gives Yarmuth, a first-term congressman facing a rematch with former Rep. Anne Northup, the incumbent he narrowly defeated in 2006, some free airtime.
“While the Iraqi government enjoys a multi-billion dollar surplus, American tax dollars are still being used to pay the salaries of Iraqi security forces, and provide basic services to Iraqis,” he says. “At a time when our nation scrambles for new ways to stimulate the economy, the money we ship outside our borders to Iraq – at least 2 and a half billion dollars per week and 10 billion dollars a month - is not only linked to our economic skid, but is a leading cause of it.”
The complete address follows:
“Good morning, this is Congressman John Yarmuth from Kentucky’s Third Congressional district.
“This week in Washington, General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker appeared before Congress to discuss the state of the war in Iraq. I have the greatest respect for these two distinguished leaders and their service to our nation, but their testimony was disappointing.
“General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker failed to offer a plan to change direction in Iraq and redeploy our troops. Instead, they offered more of the same, with U.S. troops and taxpayers paying the price.
“Americans have already endured enormous losses in Iraq. More than 4,000 troops have given their lives in battle and the American people have spent more than half a trillion dollars to prolong our presence there. While the Iraqi government enjoys a multi-billion dollar surplus, American tax dollars are still being used to pay the salaries of Iraqi security forces, and provide basic services to Iraqis.
“Next week, the American people will once again be reminded of the cost of this war. As April 15th approaches, millions of our hard-working citizens will pay their taxes knowing full well that their hard-earned dollars will be shipped to Iraq rather than invested here at home.
“At a time when our nation scrambles for new ways to stimulate the economy, the money we ship outside our borders to Iraq – at least 2 and a half billion dollars per week and 10 billion dollars a month - is not only linked to our economic skid, but is a leading cause of it.
“The American people know the tax dollars they send to Iraq could be put to good use here at home. Across America, our roads and bridges are crumbling and are in desperate need of repair, yet taxpayer dollars are being squandered on an Iraqi government that is riddled with waste, fraud, and corruption.
“Health care costs are skyrocketing in the U.S., yet the cost of one month in Iraq could extend the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which the President vetoed, to ten million children of working families for a full year.
“While Iraq runs a surplus because of oil revenues, Americans can’t afford to get to work, to pick up a child from school, or to drive to their places of worship because of record prices at the pump. UPS, the largest employer in my hometown of Louisville, warned just this week of lower profits due to increased gas prices.
“Families have seen college costs rise 60 percent in recent years, still the cost of a single day in Iraq would send 18,000 students to college with Pell Grants.
“And in the few minutes I talk to you today, we’ll spend more than 1 million dollars in Iraq.
“Democrats have already taken action to revive the American economy and support middle-class families. Working with Republicans and President Bush, we enacted an economic stimulus plan that will provide millions of Americans with recovery rebate checks of up to $1,200. Those checks will arrive in mailboxes in the coming weeks, and they will help families who need relief the most and give our economy a badly needed boost.
“We know we must do more. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said this week that we are in the throes of a recession. Waiting for the economy to improve while families continue to suffer is not an option.
“Unfortunately, that’s the only plan President Bush has proposed. This week, the President said he opposes Democratic legislation that would help solve the housing crisis and keep more Americans in their homes. The President also said he opposed Democrats’ efforts to enact a second economic stimulus plan that would reinvest in America and assist workers who have lost their jobs.
“President Bush thinks relief for American families can wait. We know relief can’t come soon enough.
“In the coming weeks, Democrats will continue to work to reinvigorate the economy. We will fight for a second economic stimulus package that provides more aid to workers, offers support to families, and invests in U.S. businesses that will spur our long-term growth. We will craft comprehensive housing legislation that will help secure the American dream for families at risk of losing their homes. We will continue our fight to change direction in Iraq, and we will once again invest in America.
“Democrats will continue to work for change because we need a New Direction in this country that restores faith in America’s future.
“This is Congressman John Yarmuth. Thank you for listening.”





Comments
Where's the war been? Off the front page it seems--why isn't the war tied in with the 'sub-prime' coverage?
Why are poor people demonized for wanting the only tax benefit left after Reagan charged through? I'll bet they coulda kept those homes if not for the war. I'll betcha!
Posted by: golden oldie | April 12, 2008 11:33 AM
We should abandon NATO, Japan,and Korea, for the same reason. Let them pay for their own defense.
Posted by: whatnow | April 12, 2008 1:00 PM
The economy was doing fine until the democrats won control of the House & Senate. This coupled with the recent wins on the State and Local level had led to the drastic slowdown in our economy since they don't believe in private enterprise.
If you think it's bad now, you "ain't seen nothin yet" - just wait until all the recent democratic tax increases kick in.
Posted by: Todd | April 12, 2008 1:11 PM
Duh!! Even the Incompetent-in-Chief figured that one out!!! Why else would he be trying to spin the Iraqi Occupation so persistently!!? He doesn't want America to realize that!!!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, Chicago | April 12, 2008 1:17 PM
The government is taking in record revenues (with some help from the military industrial complex by the way), and social programs have expanded exponentially during the Bush administration. I’m all for the idea of Iraqis paying their own way, but any money saved should go into paying off our debt, rather than more handouts. This chatter is nothing more than trying to buy more votes.
Posted by: Independent | April 12, 2008 1:20 PM
Since some Obama kids accused me of being MJ (I'm not) and then stole partsof my handle to smear me in a McCarthyite manner, I went looking for MJ entries. This one is very interesting and seems pertinent to a thread about economic matters:
----
From MJ:
Obama on the other hand, is all about "The Green"...cha-ching!
In November 2007, Obama came out against a bill that would have reformed the notorious Mining Law of 1872. Signed into law by Ulysses Grant, the current statute allows mining companies to pay as little as $2.50 an acre to mine for hardrock minerals like gold, silver, and copper without paying royalties. Yearly profits for mining hardrock on public lands is estimated to be in excess of $1 billion a year according to Earthworks, a group that monitors the industry. The industry spends freely when it comes to lobbying: an estimated $60 million between 1998-2004 according to The Center on Public Integrity.
The Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2007 would have finally overhauled the law and allowed American taxpayers to reap part of the royalties (4 percent of gross revenue on existing mining operations and 8 percent on new ones). The bill provided a revenue source to cleanup abandoned hardrock mines, which is likely to cost taxpayers over $50 million, and addressed health and safety concerns in the 11 affected western states.
One of Obama's key advisors in Nevada is a Nevada-based lobbyist in the employ of various mining companies (CBS News "Obama's Position On Mining Law Questioned. Democrat Shares Position with Mining Executives Who Employ Lobbyist Advising Him," November 14, 2007).
Posted by: golden oldie | April 12, 2008 2:59 PM
http://www.aid4families-aid4families.blogspot.com is where I followed this link from and can only watch in horror as people who constantly demand accountability for liberals and democrats make excuses. The war was an invasion by false pretense. PERIOD. The robber barons are being bail out at taxpayers expense while rights for the taxpayers are crushed by bank lobbyist. PERIOD. This invasion started and is worsening the world security. PERIOD. The war on terror is as stupid as saying a war on drug...oh wait.. Next let's get that war on paranoia going, how about a war on colonial greed or capitalistic imperialism. Write to congress and have them recall all reserve guarantees, so we don't bail out irresponsible people who should have known better, in the words of the neo-nuts.
Posted by: aid4families | April 12, 2008 5:26 PM