by Jill Zuckman
Political parties often look to special elections as a harbinger of things to come.
Tuesday night, Democrat Niki Tsongas beat Republican Jim Ogonowski to represent the 5th Congressional district of Massachusetts. Tsongas, the widow of 1992 presidential candidate Paul Tsongas, succeeds Democrat Marty Meehan, who resigned to become chancellor of the University of Massachusetts at Lowell.
Less clear is what the election results mean for congressional races in 2008, if they mean anything at all. Democrats, not surprisingly, are hoping to increase the size of their majority, while Republicans, plagued by retirements of senior lawmakers, would like to take back control of the House.
The National Republican Congressional Committee was quick to point out that no Republican candidate for the U.S. House in Massachusetts has won more than 43 percent of the vote since 1996. Ogonowski, the brother of an American Airlines pilot killed in the Sept. 11 attacks, was expected to finish with 46 percent.
But by night's end, the final tally was 51-45 in Tsongas's favor.
"Jim's hard-fought, grassroots campaign, exposed a shift in the political tide, and most impressively, he did it in the bluest of blue states,'' said NRCC Chairman Tom Cole (R-Okla.). "He proved that a Republican challenger, who centers their campaign on the core issues of lower taxes, less government spending, respect for the rule of law and most importantly, the issue of bringing change to Washington, can effectively garner votes from independents and swing voters.''
An NRCC memo described the race as a "severely under-performing single-digit victory," portending the end of the Democratic wave that swept Republicans out of Congress in 2006.
"In what is clearly shaping up to be a change election, Democrats have reason to worry as they are no longer seen as the solution to the problem in Washington," the memo said, citing "rock bottom" approval ratings for Congress.
Not surprisingly, Democrats interpreted the results as more evidence that voters oppose the war in Iraq, just as they do. And in a week when Democrats are trying to override President Bush's veto of legislation to provide health care coverage to low-income children, they saw it as proof that voters want representatives who share their goals.
"She is a lifelong advocate for children and working families in Massachusetts. Niki will be a tremendous asset to the Democratic Caucus,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. “Massachusetts voters sent a clear message, they support candidates who fight for their values to provide children’s health care and work to end the war in Iraq.”
DCCC officials pointed out that the district, which includes the old textile town of Lowell, is the most conservative in the state, routinely voting for Republicans in statewide races. Even Deval Patrick, the Democratic governor, barely eked out 50.5 percent here during his overwhelming romp to victory last year.
"The reality is that MA-05 has a long history of electing Republicans. Tonight, voters chose someone to stand up to President Bush in support of children's health care and ending the war in Iraq," said Jennifer Crider, the DCCC communications director.
"The former NRCC chair said it best last year," she said, referring to Rep. Tom Reynolds (R-N.Y.). " 'There aren't any moral victories. You either win or you don't in this business.' "





Comments
Nikki Tsongas' victory in Massachusetts' 5th district is anything but stunning. The Dems were so frightened of a man who campaigned out of his car, who had never run for public office , and who spent just a fraction of his opponents thousands that they brought in former Pres Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and old stand-bys like Teddy Kennedy. Tsongas (for all her supposed support for families and children) is also an amnesty for illegals supporter which went over big in several towns. Her support did not come from struggling former industrial giants like Lowell and Lawrence, but form yuppie strongholds like Acton and Concord. I suspect they feared losing their illegal immigrant gardeners or at least having to pay them an American wage! By the way, the widow Tsongas does not live in the district, having moved to Charlestown after her husband's death. She owns land in Lawrence which allowed her to be a resident. Sadly, poliitcs as usual in the Commonwealth!
Posted by: Will B | October 17, 2007 8:25 AM
This guy had everything on his side (positive media coverage, the 9/11 connection, a conservative district), and he still lost. The media would absolutely love to tell us that this means Republicans are coming back and that they are in for a great 2008. Funny how I didn't hear that so much when Democrats won special elections in 2004...
Posted by: Carl | October 17, 2007 8:51 AM
Carl, what special elections did Democrats win in 04?
A conservative district in the People's Republic of Taxachusetts?
And, how exactly exactly does the media want to "absolutely love" to tell us of a GOP comeback in 08?
Do you get your news from the Hugo Chavez Daily Blog?
Posted by: John D | October 17, 2007 9:21 AM
Someone should explain to Jill Zuckmann the difference between arbiter and harbinger.
If you don't know the language, either get help or don't write the article.
Posted by: Jay Tressler | October 17, 2007 9:27 AM
When Bush won 51% of the vote in 2004, he called it a mandate. I guess times have changed, with "a shift in the political tide" so to speak, that makes a close loss seem like a victory to Republicans.
Posted by: kb | October 17, 2007 11:02 AM
John D,
Here's one special election that democrats won in 2004.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4295237/
Posted by: Gary | October 17, 2007 11:18 AM
Yes, Gary, that Democrat win had national good national implications for the Dems as the story said. Hmmmm, seems to me the GOP won the White House, gained House seats and gained Senate seats in 2004.
For the most part, these special elections don't mean squat, especially when a Democrat wins a long-time Democratic seat or if a Republican won a long-time Republican seat.
Posted by: John D | October 17, 2007 11:58 AM
Hey folks this is the People's Republic of Massachussets also known as: Taxachussets.
It is so blue Kennedy and Kerry hail from there.
Paul Tsongas her husband was known by we Republicans as tax on gas because that's what he wanted $5.00 gasoline. The state is pro-abortion and pretty much for gay marriage. This is hardly a bellwether state to predict elephant or jackass chances in 08. Jerry White, Springfield, IL
Posted by: Jerry White | October 17, 2007 1:06 PM
The facts Jill Zuckman tries to hide from the readers:
This is a district that John Kerry carried 57%-41% in 2004. Republican Ogonowski, a war veteran, reduced the normal Dem margin from 16% to 6%--a 10% GOP gain. And he was outspent 4-1.
The GOP gain just may have something to do with the fact that the Dem Congress has all time low poll approval ratings.
More results showing gains like these, and the GOP will regain control of Congress in 2008.
Posted by: Bruce | October 17, 2007 2:24 PM