The Swamp
-
Posted October 16, 2007 12:32 PM
The Swamp

by James Oliphant

On the eve of hearings on the president’s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, three influential senators on the Judiciary Committee are asking the White House to pull a candidate for another high-level post at the Justice Department because of his involvement in secret memos authorizing torture.

durbin%20before%20mikes%20small%20size

Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin (Ill.), Russ Feingold (Wis.) and Edward Kennedy (Mass.) sent a letter to President Bush today requesting that he withdraw the nomination of Steven Bradbury to the Office of Legal Counsel. The obscure but critically important office has been responsible for crafting some of the administration’s most contentious anti-terror policies.

Bradbury has been serving in the post on an interim basis since 2005. In that role, according to a story earlier this month in The New York Times, he reportedly signed off on two memos that authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to use abusive interrogation techniques on suspected terrorists. The memos came just months after the department had disavowed the so-called “Bybee memo” that had earlier authorized similar abusive techniques.

The Times reported that upon taking office, then-Atty. Gen Alberto Gonzales signed off on one Bradbury’s memos, secretly re-authorizing the interrogation policy.

Today, on the Senate floor, Durbin said that Bradbury and the Justice Department had failed to provide the Judiciary Committee with information about the internal policy change. “We do not know enough about where Mr. Bradbury stands on the issue of torture,” Durbin said. “What we know is troubling. Mr. Bradbury refuses to repudiate un-American and inhumane tactics such as water boarding, mock executions and physically detaining [and] abusing detainees.”

The senators also complain that Bradbury’s role in authorizing the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program also has gone undisclosed. That National Security Agency program has since been placed under the supervision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which is now supposed to review and approve wiretap requests.

Bradbury’s predecessor at the Office of Legal Counsel was Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard University law professor whose recent book detailed his objections to the administration’s positions on torture and surveillance. Goldsmith replaced Jay Bybee, who authored the original “torture memo” that Goldsmith repudidated. Bybee is now a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

Goldsmith, along with then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, was part of an internecine policy war within the administration over the anti-terror tactics. After Gonzales came aboard from the White House in 2005, both Comey and Goldsmith resigned.

At tomorrow’s hearings over Michael Mukasey, senators on the Judiciary Committee are expected to drill the nominee about his positions on torture, surveillance and other administration practices. See this story here from today’s Tribune.

(Durbin photo by Chuck Kennedy/KRT)

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

"Why not just have our own tribunal in secret courts for all former Congressional members now awaiting jail, in jail, or privately being investigated. Why not just render the entire GOP to some destined island until they tell the truth about, 9/11 THE PATRIOT ACT, SBILL 1639, PROTECT AMERICA ACT, PURGING OF THE PROSECUTORS, BLACKWATER AND ITS ROLL IN KATRINA, MONICA GOODLING AND SARA TAYLORS REAL ROLES IN THE DOJ, WHY IMMUNITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO CORPORATIONS WHO COMMITTED HIGH TREASON AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RENDERING AND ALLOWING THEM TO EAVESDROP, WIRETAP OR DATAMINE AMERICANS.

Let them explain, PL 110-55 and why we should close our eyes to law breakers.

MEANWHILE - NO LAW OF THE LAND - AND A volatile America with this administrations ability to bring out the race card towards anyone hispanic or mexican in america.

I'm hoping there are no confirmations until CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS ARE ANSWERED, and IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE IS ON THE FLOOR.

There should be criminal charges brought down by then Alberto will testify against George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Fred Fielding as to their actionable intelligence each time they listened to TED KENNEDY, HILLARY CLINTON, AND JOHN MCCAIN.


I understand Mr. Bradbury is opposed to all forms of torture except for the playing of Hillary Clinton's speeches over and over and over and over.


Good for Durbin.

Call me old fashioned, but I'm opposed to torture and torture apologists. I'd like to think that most Americans think likewise.


Over and over we've heard how torture doesn't work. Either it is usefully being used, uselessly being used, or not being used but maybe threatened.
Since Durbin has slandered our military for political purposes before its probable this is the same.


Boy, Dickie Durbin, Feingold and Teddy Kennedy the three muskateers.
These three Senators are paranoid and unqualified to determine if torture is really torture. All three lean toward giving Jihadist Islamofascists American civil rights.
Steve Bradbury excells because of the stupidity of his unqualified enemies in the U.S. Senate.
Tax and spend liberals like these three couldn't win a war if they had to fight one.They are obstructionists period. President Bush stick it to them as they do to you over and over.
These three will lose the war and are hardly qualified to secure the Amwerican people. In short they are blow bags. Jerry White, Springfield, IL


whatnow, are you taking lessons from RNC Bruce? What the heck are you talking about? Your post doesn't make any sense.


Posted by: Jerry White | October 16, 2007 3:03 PM

Jerry Whitie,

If Durbin is so bad why is it that the Republican Party in Illinois can't seem to come up with someone who can beat him?

Answer: No one trusts the Republick Party anymore.


Jerry White from Springfield IL,

You need to put away the speed bottle or something.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "t" in the field below:

Election 2008
Tag Cloud
[What is this?]