The Swamp
-
Posted February 24, 2006 2:29 PM
The Swamp

Posted by Mark Silva at 2:30 pm CST

The United States is at war with an enemy that will never shake the resolve of the American people, the U.S. is taking the fight to the enemy rather than facing the enemy at home, freedom is on the march and America’s vision of a free world will prevail.

The world also is a safer place now that Saddam Hussein is in prison, and American forces in Iraq will “stand down’’ as Iraqi security forces “stand up,’’ but the commitment of U.S. troops there will be determined by conditions on the ground, not politicians in Washington.

This is the state of the war against terrorism as President Bush defines it today – and today, in an address to the American Legion in Washington, D.C., the president distilled virtually every argument of the war that he has waged since the terrorist assaults of Sept. 11, 2001, and the war that he is determined to fight “so long as I’m the president of the United States.’’

Since the terrorist assaults on New York and the Pentagon in 2001, since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, and since the continuing struggle in Iraq and Afghanistan which has claimed more than 2200 American lives, Bush has delivered a series of defining principles that serve as the under-pinning of a policy that has drawn increasing opposition from the American public.

But today, in a refinement of all the president’s rhetoric on the war on terror, his speech-writers rolled out what amounts to the best hits of the president’s war on terror. The essence of his collected philosophy since 9/11 could be discerned in a series of remarks reeled out in his address today.

“We remain a nation at war,’’ said Bush, introduced at the American Legion as “the commander-in-chief at a time of war.’’ “The war reached our shores on September the 11th, 2001, when our nation awoke to a sudden attack. Like generations before us, we have accepted new responsibilities, and we will confront these dangers with firm resolve.

“The enemy we face is brutal and determined,’’ Bush said. “The terrorists have an ideology. They share a hateful vision that rejects tolerance and crushes all dissent. They seek a world where women are oppressed, where children are indoctrinated, and those who reject their ideology of violence and extremism are threatened and often murdered.

“They don't have the military strength to beat us. They can't beat us on the battlefield. They just cannot defeat the United States military. And so they're trying to break our will with stunning acts of violence,’’ Bush said. “The terrorists do not understand America. They're not going to shake our will. We will stay in the hunt, we will never give in, and we will prevail.

“The terrorists know that the only way they can defeat us is to break our will and force our retreat. And that's not going to happen so long as I'm the president of the United States.’’

When it comes to American relations with other nations, Bush said: “I've set a clear doctrine: America makes no distinction between the terrorists and the countries that harbor them. If you harbor a terrorist, you're just as guilty as the terrorists, and you're an enemy of the United States of America.

“One of the clear lessons of September the 11th is that the United States of America must confront threats before they fully materialize,’’ he said. “After September the 11th, I looked at the world and saw a clear threat in Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein was an enemy of the United States. He was firing at American military pilots patrolling the no-fly zones. He was a state sponsor of terror. He was in open defiance of more than a dozen United Nations resolutions. He had invaded his neighbors. He had brutalized his people. He had a history of using and producing weapons of mass destruction. Saddam defied the will of the world.

“And because we acted to remove this threat, Saddam Hussein is in prison, he's on trial for his crimes,’’ Bush said, “and the world is better for it.

“We're committed to an historic long-term goal: To secure the peace of the world, we seek the end of tyranny in our world,’’ said the president, reiterating the theme of his inaugural address after election to a second term. “Far from being a hopeless dream, the advance of freedom is the great story of our time. Just 25 years ago, at the start of the 1980s, there were only 45 democracies on the face of the Earth. Today, there are 122.

“Across the world freedom is on the march, and we will not rest until the promise of freedom reaches people everywhere across the globe,’’ he said.

As the recent surge of violence in Iraq has demonstrated: “As freedom spreads to new parts of the world, we're seeing something else, as well -- the uncertainty that often follows democratic change. Free elections are exhilarating events. Yet history teaches us that the path to a free society is long, and not always smooth.

“Iraq remains a serious situation,’’ Bush said. “But I'm optimistic, because the Iraqi people have spoken, and the Iraqi people made their intentions clear. In December, more than 11 million Iraqis sent a clear message to the world and to the terrorists, they want their freedom.’’

And as he has stated many times: “We're carrying out our clear strategy of victory in Iraq. On the political side, we're helping Iraqis build a strong democracy so old resentments will be eased and the insurgency marginalized. On the economic side, we're continuing reconstruction efforts and helping Iraqis build a modern economy so all Iraqi citizens can experience the benefits of freedom. And on the security side, we're striking terrorist targets, and at the same time, training Iraqis which are becoming increasingly capable of carrying the fight to the enemy.

“Our strategy in Iraq is, as the Iraqis stand up, we'll stand down,’’ Bush said. “Troop levels on the ground will be decided by commanders on the ground -- not by politicians in Washington, D.C.’’

“Freedom is on the march in the broader Middle East. The hope of liberty now reaches from Kabul to Baghdad, to Beirut, and beyond. Slowly but surely, we're helping to transform the broader Middle East from an arc of instability into an arc of freedom. And as freedom reaches more people in this vital region, we'll have new allies in the war on terror, and new partners in the cause of moderation in the Muslim world and in the cause of peace.

“We will stay on the offense,’’ the president said. “We will continue to hunt down the terrorists, wherever they hide.’’

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Why is that democracy is associated with freedom and something good? Look what happened in Israel where the Palastinians have freely chosen Hamas party to be their representatives. America considers them a terrorist organization. Clearly what we mean by democracy and freedom is whatever America says it should be. That is, America freely chooses democracy for others while denying those it is imposed on any real say in the matter. We conveniantly get around this objection by saying that they must be pacified, I mean democratized because they harbor terrorists which threatens our safety.
When bush says “The enemy we face is brutal and determined,’’... “The terrorists have an ideology. They share a hateful vision that rejects tolerance and crushes all dissent." Is not waging war on the populance of Iraq brutal and to "stay the course" determined. Is not propounding democracy as the only "right" way to govern ones self an ideology? There is a word for all of this: hypocracy. And it doesn't make us look much more different from the ones we call the bad guys.


"The terrorists have an ideology. They share a hateful vision that rejects tolerance and crushes all dissent. They seek a world where women are oppressed, where children are indoctrinated, and those who reject their ideology of violence and extremism are threatened and often murdered."

Sounds a lot like the philosophy of Christian fundamentalism to me. Or at the very minimum, the agenda of the "conservative" Supreme Court.


I think these statements are a little extreme, although I'm as glad as anybody else to see the right-wing squirm on the points of their own frequently hypocritical ideology. I believe strongly that all world citizens, whatever their country of domain, should be free to choose their own way of life, whether or not the U.S. agrees with that way of life, as long as said way of life doesn't harm anybody else. Yes, Palestinians having elected a Hamas government is kind of uncomfortable, but (is this really me saying this???) we're currently doing what I think is the smart thing by taking a "wait and see" stance on them, channeling money away from the terrorist part of the government and into humanitarian efforts. We're hoping, as I understand it, that by being elected to power, Hamas may be ultimately forced out of its terroristic ideology in order to live up to its own promises. In other words, they'd be facing the ironic two-edged sword of their own dogma. Time will tell.

Our own right wing, even the Christian fundamentalists, haven't gone to the extreme of murder for a long, long time (you're correct if you're talking about the Inquisition eras or about our early colonial witch hunts, but religion hasn't actually murdered anyone for centuries). It's a stretch to say our women are oppressed or that our children are "indoctrinated" in ways that even come close to the brutal lives of citizens nations outside our direct sphere. Our Supreme Court has yet to prove itself one way or another, although it's pretty safe to assume it'll be more conservative than in the past -- but it's going to take more than a Supreme Court however right-wing to truly brutalize us as a people.

You're both right to be watchful of these situations and to be wary of a strong possibility our government is being hypocritical or untruthful, but I think the opinions you've expressed are out of focus even if you are pointed in the right direction.


John,

"religion hasn't actually murdered anyone for centuries"? If you mean religion in general, I direct your attention to the middle east. Osama bin Laden, anyone? Islamic Jihad? If you mean Christianity specifically, does the name Eric Rudolph mean anything to you?


Hi, Dienne!

By "religion" I WAS talking about "Christian fundamentalism" as "mg" referred to it in a comment above mine. And I was also limiting to organized religion -- churches -- not individuals acting in a religious fervor, which would include Eric Rudolph all over the place, and probably a whole lot of others as well. The sentence you chose is, indeed, worded incorrectly for what I meant to say -- thanks for pointing that out.

And I'm reiterating my stance above (see paragraph 1 sentence 1) that I'd love to witness Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Fred Phelps et. al. having to answer for the hatred they've spewed in God's name. They and the political right-wing have all lied in the name of their cause, and they've chosen their facts so selectively that what they prove has no bearing whatsoever to the truth. I think they're horrible people. But, as far as I know, Christian-right Churches have not gone as far as murdering anybody yet, not since the witch-hunts of our colonial times. And, for all the frustration and anger I feel toward the administration and said Christian right, I think that comparing the cushy lives most of us lead in America to what people in the Middle East, or Africa or the Asian "third world" have to go through every day is an insult to their horror. I don't mean that to hurt mg's feelings, but we really do have it far to good here to be talking about being oppressed, threatened and murdered by our government or any church. "Indoctrination" might have some validity, but I think it's a stretch.

End result of an already way-too-wordy re-hash? Go after Bush and his cronies, go after Pat and Jerry and all the other sanctimonious liars ALL YOU WANT -- but be careful what you say about what they do to make sure it's true.

Thanks again!


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "e" in the field below:

Election 2008
Tag Cloud
[What is this?]