baltimoresun.com

« Upcoming editorial: Md. is at the bottom in the Race to the Top | Main | Baltimore County Council pension bill: a good start »

November 24, 2009

Upcoming editorial: Md. has a tax credit that creates jobs; why can't Annapolis extend it?

Here's a preview of an editorial we're working on. Let us know what you think. The best comments will appear alongside it in the print edition.

What do you call an economic stimulus program that produces an $8.53 return on every dollar invested? A smashing success? The envy of the White House? The greatest idea to come out of government since the income tax refund? In Annapolis, they use quite a different title: Endangered.

That’s because the enormously successful Maryland Heritage Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credit is set to expire next year because bickering state lawmakers can’t agree on a plan to extend it. Admittedly, the program that gives developers an incentive to renovate older buildings has been hotly debated -- but, in the irony of state politics, the controversy stems from its very success.

From the West Side’s Atrium Apartments on Howard Street to The Can Company shopping and office complex on Canton’s Boston Street, many of the most innovative and valuable commercial and residential redevelopment projects to be undertaken in Baltimore over the last decade have been made possible by the heritage tax credit.

Baltimore is not the only community to benefit from this economic revitalization engine -- small towns from the Eastern Shore to Western Maryland have, too -- but the city has clearly benefited the most. There are simply more opportunities to renovate historic (and under-valued) buildings in Baltimore than anywhere else in the state.

But even that fact works to the Maryland’s advantage. With some of the highest concentrations of poverty in the state, the city is also the ideal target for such investment. A report produced earlier this year by the Abell Foundation found that for every $1 million in tax credits, 72.5 jobs are created.

Yet over its 13-year history, the tax credit program has been treated like an unwanted stepchild by the state legislature. Its been capped and cut and tied up in red tape in order to reduce its cost and funnel more of the benefits to other jurisdictions.

 

Much of the opposition can be traced to one person, House Ways and Means Chairwoman Sheila E. Hixson, who hails from Montgomery County, a subdivision with far fewer historic rehabilitation projects than the city. Delegate Hixson might be convinced to extend the program beyond its 2010 expiration -- but no doubt only in its current form. Gov. Martin O’Malley has sought to upgrade the program to add resources and reduce its waiting period (often of a year or more), but a measure to do so died late in the last legislative session.

Such a stand-off could stop the Baltimore economic renaissance in its tracks. As it is, a project like Tide Point could no longer qualify for the $17.7 million tax credit it actually received nearly a decade ago because the program has been scaled back so much. (It’s down to a total of just $5 million for commercial projects during the current fiscal year).

Enough is enough. The state’s budget crisis can’t be used as an excuse not to renew the heritage tax credit program. The economic recession is proof of how much it’s needed: Cutbacks to the program over the years have likely cost the city hundreds, if not thousands, of jobs.

Putting Baltimoreans back to work doesn’t add to the state’s long-term budget woes, it helps reduce them. More jobs not only means more people paying taxes, it results in fewer dollars needed in safety net programs.

If there’s ever been a more successful economic development program undertaken in Maryland, we haven’t seen it. That lawmakers would even consider abandoning a relatively modest tax credit that’s spurred so much historic preservation and job-creation is stupefying even by State House standards.

Posted by Andy Green at 8:57 AM | | Comments (3)
Categories: Upcoming editorials
        

Comments

It is silly that a State run by one party seems to have more problems getting benefitial legislation passed then if there were some true division of power. If this were a tax benefit with a lobby behind it there would be no doubt of the outcome, but sadly without strong lobbyists you can not get anything done which goes for the better good, unless everyone gets to put their hands in the cookie jar.

The tax and spend liberal majority in Annapolis just do not understand economics.
They handout benefits like rain water to assure votes and tax the crap out of us year after year. But thats it. Extending this tax credit is a no brainer. Right now jobs should be this state's top priority. That, and lowering our tax bills to be competitive in luring and retaining employers.
Try telling that to a progessive!

This is a great program. Can't believe developers are not in Annapolis lobbying for an extension of this tax credit. I love historic old buildings. They lend character and a unique flavor to any city or town. They are a part of our heritage; living connections to our past. What's to quibble? Extend the tax credit, rehabilitate more old buildings, preserve what our ancestors left us and create jobs. Annapolis is losing its collective sanity looking this gift horse in the mouth.
caravan

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

Contributors
Mike Cross-Barnet, who spends most of his time running The Baltimore Sun's Commentary page, has been known to opine on whatever strikes his fancy. International politics, immigration, religion, culture and social trends are just a handful of the topics you may find scrutinized in this space.

Andy Green has taken the "know a little bit about everything" approach in his time at The Sun. He was the city/state editor before coming to the editorial board, and prior to that he covered the State House and Baltimore County government. His reporting has taken him to every county in Maryland as he's tracked issues ranging from slot machine gambling to electric rates. As an editor, he oversaw coverage of crime, education, the environment, health, science and more.

Peter Jensen, former State House reporter and features writer, takes the lead on state government, transportation issues and the environment; he is the board's resident funny man and capital schmooze.

Nancy Knight grew up mucking about in boats on the Bay and handing opinions out freely to all who cared to listen. She has lived and worked in communities across the state, including Salisbury, College Park, Westminster and Baltimore, and looks forward to discussing the issues facing Marylanders today.

Glenn McNatt, who returned to editorial writing after serving as the newspaper's art critic, keeps an eye on the arts, culture, politics and the law for the editorial board.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun opinion
Editorials
Commentary
Readers Respond
Readers Respond
The Sun welcomes comments from readers. All comments become the property of The Sun, which reserves the right to edit them. Comments should include your name and address, along with day and evening telephone numbers. E-mail us: talkback@baltimoresun.com; write us: Talk Back, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001; fax us: 410-332-6977
Baltimore Sun columnists
Stay connected