baltimoresun.com

« Why didn't Balt. police tweet about string of rapes? | Main | Monument to Schaefer »

November 3, 2009

Speeders get a second chance

Public whining over speed cameras appears to have, at least momentarily, softened hearts at the Maryland State Highway Administration. The SHA has decided that motorists shouldn't have to pay a $40 fine for driving too fast in construction zones for another two weeks.

While that's great for scofflaws, it would seem to thwart the original purpose of the measure: to make work zones safer for both construction crews and motorists. The law has been in effect since Oct. 1, but so far 900 warnings have been sent to violators.

Under the law, motorists only face a fine when they drive at least 12 mph over the speed limit, a generous standard to be sure.

Last year, 11 people lost their lives in work zone crashes in Maryland. Nationwide, there were 720 fatalities. Speeding and driver inattention are considered to be leading factors involved in these accidents.

SHA officials say the delay was necessary chiefly because the first violations weren't mailed out until Oct. 14, so extending the warning period to a full month would seem to be in the spirit of the original 30-day reprieve. On the other hand, that the contractor has employed only two specially equipped SUVs for the job and has recorded so many violations in so short a period of time suggests the need for enforcement is substantial.

Nothing gets a driver's attention quite like a speeding ticket. One can only hope that a warning has as positive an effect.

 

Posted by Peter Jensen at 1:17 PM | | Comments (11)
Categories: Transportation
        

Comments

Public whining?
BS Peter.
It is recognizing what speed cameras are-
another LIBERAL ANNAPOLIS TAX!
As the 4th highest taxed state in the country when does the asault on the taxpayer's wallet end?

I just don't understand people who believe that speeding in an automobile and endangering others is somehow a constitutional right.

Ironically, work zones are one of the few road situations where speed cameras can be justified. It is all the other places where the counties propose to use them under the guise of safety that are the problem.

For those late to the party:
Speed cameras are entirely about revenue; safety is a smoke screen.

Safety can be much more effectively achieved in most locations by other much less expensive methods (eg traffic calming).


The police Chief in DC made a comment regarding speed cameras that PROVED the fact they are for revenue and not safety.
She was very upset and wanted legislation to prohibit the new GPS based location program that will warn you of the cameras. She was incensed!
But look at it IF it was safety in mind. Who would care if your GPS would warn you? Would you not slow down? Is that not the point? Why not put BIG HUGE SIGNS warning of a speed camera coming up? That would slow you down wouldn't it? What if there were signs and FAKE cameras? No one would know and they WOULD slow to the speed limit.

But we all know it is revenue not safety as Lanier has admitted.

"endangering others is somehow a constitutional right"

Well, actually the constitution has very clear rights enumerated: due process, trial by jury, and facing one's accuser in court. All these are denied so that a kangaroo court can be set up to process the $40 Annapolis tax as quickly as possible.

This is also about lazy journalism that lazily repeats whatever "safety" canards that the speed camera P.R. agency feeds them. Meanwhile, the legislators responsible for this pocket massive donations from the company (ACS) that is going to be making millions off this deal. Hint to Mr. Jensen: not everyone appreciates your denigrating everyone who opposes this scam as a "speeder."

i give it a month per camera before they are neutralized by some renegade citizens.

OK, what''s the definition of a "construction zone" per the legislation? Guess what? I bet the Legislature screwed-up with the bill's wording and the State will have no legal standing in court.

don't speed and there is no problem


(Exactly so. In the future, I'll try to characterize opponents of speed cameras as speeders AND speeder-apologists to satisfy my critics despite the fact it requires these lazy fingers to deal with more key strokes. - PJ)

I've been a speeder all my driving years. Got plenty of tickets and fines to prove it. I'm in favor of speed cameras. When I know there is a camera in a certain place, I don't speed. Simple as that. They do what they are supposed to do...keep people from speeding. Works for me.

One thing to remember, should you get a speed camera ticket in a work zone, do the following: More than 20 days prior to the trial, request the presence of the WORK ZONE SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATOR at the trial. Should the WORK ZONE SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM
OPERATOR not show up, case dismissed? Also, the cost of the WORK ZONE SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATOR will be borne by the contractor, cost taken directly from profits. Eliminate the profit motive, eliminate the program.


(2) IF A PERSON WHO RECEIVED A CITATION UNDER SUBSECTION
(D) OF THIS SECTION DESIRES A WORK ZONE SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM
OPERATOR TO BE PRESENT AND TESTIFY AT TRIAL, THE PERSON SHALL NOTIFY
THE COURT AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT ISSUED THE CITATION IN
WRITING NO LATER THAN 20 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL.

(Exactly so. In the future, I'll try to characterize opponents of speed cameras as speeders AND speeder-apologists to satisfy my critics despite the fact it requires these lazy fingers to deal with more key strokes. - PJ)

2 points:

a-you can't argue with a machine

b-have you ever met a tax enacted by your tax and spend liberals in Annapolis that you were not against? Peter, as a resident of Baltimore city I am tapped out paying these astronomical taxes imposed both by Murdermore and by the People's Republic of Maryland.
When does it end?
When does this city and state stop spending and become fiscally responsible with our money-our money the citizens of Maryland. Riddle me that Liberal!

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "e" in the field below:
Contributors
Mike Cross-Barnet, who spends most of his time running The Baltimore Sun's Commentary page, has been known to opine on whatever strikes his fancy. International politics, immigration, religion, culture and social trends are just a handful of the topics you may find scrutinized in this space.

Andy Green has taken the "know a little bit about everything" approach in his time at The Sun. He was the city/state editor before coming to the editorial board, and prior to that he covered the State House and Baltimore County government. His reporting has taken him to every county in Maryland as he's tracked issues ranging from slot machine gambling to electric rates. As an editor, he oversaw coverage of crime, education, the environment, health, science and more.

Peter Jensen, former State House reporter and features writer, takes the lead on state government, transportation issues and the environment; he is the board's resident funny man and capital schmooze.

Nancy Knight grew up mucking about in boats on the Bay and handing opinions out freely to all who cared to listen. She has lived and worked in communities across the state, including Salisbury, College Park, Westminster and Baltimore, and looks forward to discussing the issues facing Marylanders today.

Glenn McNatt, who returned to editorial writing after serving as the newspaper's art critic, keeps an eye on the arts, culture, politics and the law for the editorial board.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun opinion
Editorials
Commentary
Readers Respond
Readers Respond
The Sun welcomes comments from readers. All comments become the property of The Sun, which reserves the right to edit them. Comments should include your name and address, along with day and evening telephone numbers. E-mail us: talkback@baltimoresun.com; write us: Talk Back, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001; fax us: 410-332-6977
Baltimore Sun columnists
Stay connected