baltimoresun.com

« Lipscomb can't donate to candidates? Too late. | Main | Upcoming editorial: The county should crack down on scrap metal dealers »

October 30, 2009

Upcoming editorial: Signs in crisis pregnancy centers

The legislation proposed by City Council President Stephanie C. Rawlings-Blake to require crisis pregnancy centers that do not provide abortion or birth control services (or referrals for those servies) to post a sign saying so has turned into a bit of a tempest in a teapot. Those clinics, which are nonprofits, say they're being singled out by abortion rights groups. Advocates from NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland say they've sent undercover interns to centers like those and found they were given inaccurate information about abortion -- that it causes cancer, infertility, etc. But it's unclear from NARAL's report on the investigation which, if any, of those instances happened in Baltimore.

At the end of the day, though, the legislation just requires a sign. It doesn't say anything inaccurate or misleading, and the people who run the clinics aren't otherwise shy about stating their position in opposition to abortion rights. They have expressed concern that groups on the other side of the issue would use the law to harass them and rack up fines, but that's not a realistic fear. The city isn't going to deputize NARAL to hand out citations. Perhaps few people are presently confused about the kind of services that are now being offered at these centers, but their clients are women going through an extremely difficult time, and it's hard to imagine the harm in making sure they know exactly what they can expect.

By that token, the City Council should pass the bill, but not before amending it to place the same requirements on centers that do provide abortion and birth control services and referrals. If the goal is truth in advertising, it should apply to everyone.

Posted by Andy Green at 12:14 PM | | Comments (15)
Categories: Upcoming editorials
        

Comments

While I would question the objectivity of NARL's investigation I think pro-life groups have made far too big a deal over this. It's just a sign. I do agree with you the easiest solution is to have all centers put up signs.

Then ALL offies of Planned Parenthood ust put up signs that say "We promote the murder of the unborn children of our clients"

That should be tit for tat!


"NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland say they've sent undercover interns to centers"

Is Pat Jessamy going to investigate these murder promoters as she is the Pulitzer Prize candidates that exposed Obama/Acorn complicity in child prostitution and sex slavery?

Real health clinics, like the City of Baltimore health department clinics and Planned Parenthood, all offer women FDA-approved birth control options. These fake "pretend" centers that lure women in with free pregnancy tests and have "intake forms" only exist to prevent women from accessing birth control and abortion and to evangelize to them (and they admit this!). Women should at the very least have a sign that gives them a hint at what to expect. Don't we trust women in this City to make the right decisions for themselves?

Thank you to the Sun for telling this issue like it is.

A simple sign. Black and white. There is no issue of saying who should or shouldn't provide or refer for any certain services. It just requires providers who give "compassionate care" (said in their own words) to be forthcoming.

This bill doesn't say that someone is bad, or provides bad care. It doesn't side with pro-choice or pro-life. The only people it sides with are the women of Baltimore City who need and DESERVE honesty in a time of crisis.

The difference between clinics offering birth control and abortion services and the "crisis centers" is that the former are already held to stringent federal, state, and local standards as medical providers. The crisis centers are NOT medical providers but they are attempting to dole out medical advice and there is no regulation of their practices at all. If they want to be a "medical provider" then they should have to meet all the requirements. If not, then the least they should do is be required to give a complete picture of what they really are and let women make up their own minds.

These clinics proselytize and mislead already vunerable women. It is only fair that the sign let the woman know what the clinic is.

I don't know why the clinics would fight these if they really are being above board.

Many if not most women don't realize that these centers are not sources of objective assistance, so this is not an issue of women being able to decide for themselves. It doesn't become apparent to them until they visit. I have had several patients who went to such a center for consolation and support but instead came away quite traumatized. A sign would make it clearer what stance these centers take.

"By that token, the City Council should pass the bill, but not before amending it to place the same requirements on centers that do provide abortion and birth control services and referrals. If the goal is truth in advertising, it should apply to everyone."

Is there an issue in City of Baltimore health clinics? I don't think so. There is no evidence that this is a problem in REAL medical clinics,so I'm not sure I understand why The Sun wants signs in REAL health clinics, like doctors' offices. Why does the Sun sees this as an issue of equality and fairness? This issue is about women walking into "pregnancy" centers. If they walk into a real health clinic, they receive the standard of care and all options counseling.

Federal, state and local research has shown there IS a problem in "pregnancy" centers. Just read the Waxman Report, if you don't trust NARAL.

You mean you would have doctors who provide or refer for abortion post signs in their waiting rooms?

Okay, so you want to make private practice doctors (and all their patients) really, really big targets? I mean even bigger bullseyes on their foreheads?

Way to go, Baltimore Sun. That'll show them. You think you are taking the "middle ground" but you're make life even harder for people who provide a legal medical procedure for women and who already have to wear bullet proof vests.

Why not just have these anti-choice centers post a simple sign that clarifies what they do and don't provide? Seems pretty innocuous to me.

If people are so emotionally distraught or intellectually confused that they do not know what type of organization they are appealing to for help, then they should consult with a government advisor prior to having sex and learn about the consequences that arise from their actions.

I don't think signs are necessary. A woman seeking an abortion will find an abortion provider, and a woman seeking to keep her unwanted and untimely pregnancy will find a crisis pregnancy center that offers her a high-five for perpetuating the cycle of poverty and an application for public assistance. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that a crisis pregnancy center in the basement of a church will have a strong slant.

"Many if not most women don't realize that these centers are not sources of objective assistance, so this is not an issue of women being able to decide for themselves." MJC, MD

You really think "many if not most" women going for abortions are pretty stupid don't you? That doesn't say much about women who would kill their children does it?

Maybe they are not smart enough to make such a life and death decision then!

Clarity and truth are the best strategies. I fully agree that a clear notice of what services are and are not provided at all clinics is to the benefit of everyone. To believe that posting a notice would single out certain clinics for harassment is ill-founded; but The Sun's editoral suggestion is a good one for it eliminates that argument.

A Planned nonParenthoodlum leader has quit after watching an ultra-sound of an abortion. she has seen the murder of a child and has had enough.

Here is the video.
http://www.breitbart.tv/planned-parenthood-leader-resigns-after-watching-ultrasound-of-abortion-procedure/

And these people want a non abortion group to post signs? Maybe the pro-murder groups should be REQUIRED to show the same ultrasound that this woman of conscience has seen.

The reason the pro-lifers are making a big deal about the sign is because they want to PERSUADE, MISLEAD, and slam J-Sus in peoples faces when they want to terminate their pregnancies. I've heard plenty of stories about the misleading anti-abortion (fake) fetus videos and J-Sus pictures/crosses all over their building....

Truth of the matter is, just because the small (but loud) portion of people have a problem with abortion, does NOT mean it will go away. So leave it be! Do not like abortion? Don't get one. Leave the choice for those that are okay with abortion. America is a free (and SECULAR) nation, with all sorts of people. Yes, including people who do not want to go through with a horrendous pregnancy. I, personally, do not want children. Nor would I ever want to give birth. So abortion is my only option. And nothing, nor anyone can get in the way of said options/opinions.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "q" in the field below:
Contributors
Mike Cross-Barnet, who spends most of his time running The Baltimore Sun's Commentary page, has been known to opine on whatever strikes his fancy. International politics, immigration, religion, culture and social trends are just a handful of the topics you may find scrutinized in this space.

Andy Green has taken the "know a little bit about everything" approach in his time at The Sun. He was the city/state editor before coming to the editorial board, and prior to that he covered the State House and Baltimore County government. His reporting has taken him to every county in Maryland as he's tracked issues ranging from slot machine gambling to electric rates. As an editor, he oversaw coverage of crime, education, the environment, health, science and more.

Peter Jensen, former State House reporter and features writer, takes the lead on state government, transportation issues and the environment; he is the board's resident funny man and capital schmooze.

Nancy Knight grew up mucking about in boats on the Bay and handing opinions out freely to all who cared to listen. She has lived and worked in communities across the state, including Salisbury, College Park, Westminster and Baltimore, and looks forward to discussing the issues facing Marylanders today.

Glenn McNatt, who returned to editorial writing after serving as the newspaper's art critic, keeps an eye on the arts, culture, politics and the law for the editorial board.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun opinion
Editorials
Commentary
Readers Respond
Readers Respond
The Sun welcomes comments from readers. All comments become the property of The Sun, which reserves the right to edit them. Comments should include your name and address, along with day and evening telephone numbers. E-mail us: talkback@baltimoresun.com; write us: Talk Back, The Sun, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore 21278-0001; fax us: 410-332-6977
Baltimore Sun columnists
Stay connected