The plight of the copy desk
If you should tune in to Sheila Kast’s Maryland Morning show on WYPR-FM (88.1) tomorrow, you can listen to an interview with Carl Sessions Stepp of the University of Maryland and me about the perilous state of the newspaper copy desk. Professor Stepp is well worth listening to.
The show begins at 9 a.m. EDT, and this segment is expected to run at about 9:15.







Comments
Are this and the National Grammar Day show things you can post to your page as podcasts, for those of us not in the listening area? Thanks.
Posted by: Loretta | April 8, 2009 9:22 AM
The station's Web site, wypr.org, has information on podcasts. I believe that they are available for a limited time after the broadcast.
Posted by: John McIntyre | April 8, 2009 9:40 AM
Just finished listening to the radio piece. Professor Stepp was brilliant.
Once again, your remarks remind me of the constraints faced by nurses working in hospitals where the marching orders include the Orwellian "doing more with less" and the term "deadlines" takes on a more literal meaning. Also familiar is the notion that a few lawsuits may be an acceptable cost of trimming staff. We who are in the trenches hope and pray that this is only morbid speculation on our part.
Where exactly is the cost saving in some of these "flexible" approaches? Presumably, your "buddy" is already fully employed and over-taxed so when he's taking time to edit your work, his own work will suffer. We get this in the hospital too, where we're advised to "help each other" as if we weren't doing that already. And don't get me started on what are termed "nurse-extenders".
Here's a strategy: hire enough competent professionals to get a job well done.
Posted by: Laura Lee | April 8, 2009 10:03 AM
I just listened to the podcast, which lasts a little less than 10 minutes: http://stream.publicbroadcasting.net/production/mp3/wypr/local-wypr-830299.mp3
Posted by: Wayne | April 8, 2009 4:20 PM
"nurse-extenders".
Oh, LL, I don't even want to ask what these might be!
Posted by: Eve | April 9, 2009 10:14 AM
Eve -- I think the nomenclature is worse than the actual definition. "Nurse extenders" is a catch-all term to describe people who are ostensibly hired to help nurses and eliminate the need for nurses to perform non-nursing jobs. Better management of resources in theory, until the Rn's are expected to train non-professional personnel to execute tasks which are really best left to nurses.
In the olden days, such people were called orderlies and nurse's aides. When the disease AIDS and all its associated stigma entered the scene in the early 1980s, the title was changed to nursing assistant. Wasn't long before "Support Associate" ,"Clinical Associate" and "Support Tech" arrived with various, confusing job descriptions.
Not exactly sure where this story ends. The poor patients (who are referred to as "clients" in nursing school) are in need of a scorecard to keep track of all the players traipsing through their rooms.
Posted by: Laura Lee | April 10, 2009 7:35 PM