Second-best is good enough
A little digression into presidential politics.
Robert V. Remini’s biography of Henry Clay includes this little nugget from the presidential election of 1844:
[W]hat many of Clay’s critics held against him, it seemed, was his outstanding ability. They did not want a statesman in the White House. They preferred men of lesser talents. Clay “may be a more brilliant orator” than Polk, conceded the Richmond Enquirer on October 28, “but we do not want splendid eloquence to conduct the executive department." He may be a “more dashing politician” than his opponent, “but we do not want any high flying and daring politician, who soars beyond the constitution” in pursuit of some “extravagant object. ... We want no aspiring ‘moon-reaching’ president.
The Republic will sometimes, luckily, place a Lincoln or a Franklin Roosevelt or some other exceptional person in the White House, but a look at that dim group between Jackson and Lincoln, or most of the chief magistrates between Lincoln and the first Roosevelt, among others, points to a strong recurring preference for unthreatening, genial mediocrity.







Comments
A lot of doctors recommend a bland diet, too.
Posted by: John DM | April 25, 2009 1:52 PM
"a look at that dim group between Jackson and Lincoln . . . points to a strong recurring preference for unthreatening, genial mediocrity."
You're forgetting about Franklin Pierce, of course.
JEM: Don't think so. Van Buren, Harrison the First, Tyler, Polk, Pierce, Buchanan.
Posted by: Bill Walderman | April 27, 2009 3:57 PM
John Early Mcintyre...I was your band director at Fleming County High School and am trying to make contact with you. I have some great memories of some pretty good times there...Just wanted to say hello.
Posted by: gary dean | May 1, 2009 12:04 AM