« Surely you jest: The anatomy professor | Main | Best line heard in the workplace »

Not a team player

In one of those freewheeling discussions that have come to mark Elizabeth Large’s Dining@Large blog, a Sandbox member remarked yesterday, “I was gigged on my annual review as ‘not a team player,’ " to which I replied, “Every time I hear of an evaluation complaining that someone is ‘not a team player,’ I have deep suspicions that there is not much of a coach.”

In articles in the sports section and in readers’ comments on those articles, a team that performs badly exposes the coach and the owners to extensive criticism. But when business managers substitute sports metaphors for judgment, that sense of responsibility higher up evaporates.

There are two levels of this phenomenon, one innocuous and one sinister.

The innocuous one is the substitution of cant and bromides — “giving 110 percent,” “there is no I in TEAM” — for meaningful direction. This is a kind of noise that managers indulge in, as the worker bees meditate on other subjects while the droning continues. It is tedious but largely harmless, since no one pays any attention to it.

At the sinister level, team talk is a means by which an inept or vindictive manager strikes out at subordinates who exercise independent thought. *

You’ve known him: the kind of manager who is a sycophant to his masters and a tyrant to his subordinates. I had been a copy editor at The Cincinnati Enquirer for half a dozen years when my boss announced that henceforth all copy editors would be evaluated half on performance and half on “attitude.” This was immediately and widely understood to mean that anyone expressing skepticism** about corporate management of Gannett or its local satraps (several of whom were clearly — there is no way to gloss over this — stupid) would be subject to retaliation. That was the day I realized that it was past time to get a resume in the mail. ***

In 17 years as a manager on The Sun’s copy desk, I have never had occasion to use the word team to my colleagues (well, maybe sardonically). A couple of weekends ago, when I had to check into the hospital suddenly for what proved to be a transient illness, people showed up, reapportioned the work, got the paper out on time and in good shape. These are the people I work alongside, who see and correct my mistakes, who collaborate, who take and share responsibility even as a brutal business climate diminishes our numbers. People who know their jobs and perform them diligently have no need for team talk.


* Of course we’ve all known co-workers Who Do Not Play Well With Others. But you don’t imagine that any amount of Team Talk will bring them around, do you?

** It is the job of editors to be skeptical. That is not a kind of temperament or mind set that can be switched on and off.

*** When I told this boss that I had been offered a position on the copy desk at The Sun, he was so delighted for me that he announced my departure to the staff three days before I gave him notice that I had accepted the offer.



Posted by John McIntyre at 6:15 PM | | Comments (7)


What a very kind tribute to your staff. I wish I could have had bosses of such quality in my career (although I think I have one now, but its still early days.)

Thinking about it, I would expect less. I'm thinking its the bow ties.

Being a "team player" usually means accepting the status quo. I would consider "not a team player" to be a compliment, were I ever to take seriously a "performance review."

Well John, it looks like
Laura Vozzella is usurping on your territory :-)
See below, taken from today's column


Team players get promoted to be bad ME's and publishers. Non team players do great journalism and get promoted to lead great staffs at great newspapers.

Cosmo Girl, Laura needs to remove the mote from her own eye. In her 11/23 column, she writes: "Who's idea was this, anyway?" and "But you'd think that [Michael Phelps] would chose, like, 'the smell of chlorine' or something." To be fair, in that last one she was quoting a blog, but she could have inserted a [sic] after 'chose' if that's what the blogger actually wrote.

Actually, when The Sun quotes texts, it does so without correcting errors, and it does not use [sic] to indicate such errors, on the ground that the practice is snotty for a daily newspaper.

Errors original with Ms. Vozzella you can blame on me; I usually edit her coluimn.

I thought the Ehrlichs - see, just add an s to make a singular plural - still had communications gurus on the payroll. ...>>>

They never had no steenkin' gurus in PR. They had BAs from Liberty University.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About John McIntyre
John McIntyre, mild-mannered editor for a great metropolitan newspaper, has fussed over writers’ work, to sporadic expressions of gratitude, for thirty years. He is The Sun’s night content production manager and former head of its copy desk. He also teaches editing at Loyola University Maryland. A former president of the American Copy Editors Society, a native of Kentucky, a graduate of Michigan State and Syracuse, and a moderate prescriptivist, he writes about language, journalism, and arbitrarily chosen topics. If you are inspired by a spirit of contradiction, comment on the posts or write to him at
Baltimore Sun Facebook page

Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Stay connected