No apologies
Please add to your list of proscribed lame devices this example from an Associated Press article describing a rare snowfall in Baghdad:
For a couple of hours anyway, a city where mortar shells routinely zoom across to the Green Zone became united as one big White Zone. As of late afternoon, there were no reports of violence. The snow showed no favoritism as it fell faintly on neighborhoods Shiite and Sunni alike, and (with apologies to James Joyce) upon all the living and the dead.
The other merits, if any, of this length of prose aside, with apologies to is a construction that a writer uses to identify an allusion that he fears the reader might not catch. It's a written equivalent of a nudge in the ribs.
If you lack confidence that your readers will catch an allusion, you probably shouldn’t make it.
With apologies to is also the construction commonly used to introduce an imitation of a well-known poem or other work of art. Most such parodies fail to impress — and if you doubt me, you can look up the feeble items disclosed on a Google search of the phrase “with apologies to Robert Frost.” Mr. Frost doesn’t need your apologies, but it would be good of you to shut up.


Comments
Is it really the belief of a number of amateur or younger journalists that their readers aren't intelligent anymore? It seems mildly offensive that a reporter would have to nudge their readers to make the allusion to (in this case) James Joyce. Wouldn't one make the assumption that those reading the paper are a little more literary than others in the world?
Posted by: JB Dryden | January 17, 2008 10:01 AM
To JB: Sadly, readers AREN'T as intelligent or as well-read anymore. Sad but true.
To JM: Thank you for making me spit coffee out on my new shiny Dell monitor with that last line. You're hysterical. :-)
Posted by: Denise | January 17, 2008 10:48 AM
Perhaps I'm cynical, but I imagine the device is less an offensive effort to connect the dots than it is a writer's attempt to "subtly" display his or her own brilliance. In defense of the younger writer, however, I would argue that pretentiousness is a crime not limited to our generation, though we may indeed be less skilled at hiding it.
Posted by: Abigail Carlson | January 17, 2008 11:46 AM
Would you mind terribly if we add the use of "lame" as an adjective to the list?
Posted by: Henning | January 17, 2008 3:38 PM
I'm tempted to say that lame is in fact an adjective, but I see your point.
This is America, and it's your language. Be my guest.
Posted by: John McIntyre | January 17, 2008 4:27 PM