« OED, please note | Main | One in 10 »

The top 10

If you want to appear literate, you will have to avoid errors in grammar and usage. These are hardy perennials.

It’s and its If you are not a copy editor, you would be astonished to discover how many professional writers confuse the contraction it’s from the possessive its. Sometimes it’s a mere typographical error; the wrong synapse fires, and the finger hits an unintended apostrophe. Sometimes it’s just sloppiness, the product of an I-don’t-have-to-pick-up-after-myself-somebody-else-can-clean-it-up attitude. But it always looks subliterate.

Who and whom Linguists have been predicting for decades that whom is doomed. It will fade out of the language except for some stock phrases — for whom the bell tolls — and attempts at creating an archaic effect. Who will serve as both subject and object. But not while I’m alive. The most common confusion comes when who is, or ought to be, the subject of a noun clause that functions as the object of a verb or preposition. In the sentence The voters will chose whoever they think is the stronger candidate, the subordinate clause whoever is the stronger candidate must have whoever as its subject.

Subject-verb agreement Generally, phrases that fall between the subject and the verb do not, and should not, influence whether the verb is singular or plural. In the sentence The lobbyist, along with the four congressmen he is accused of bribing, is to testify at a hearing, the subject is lobbyist.

Misplaced modifiers An initial phrase that functions as an adjective, describing a person, place or thing, is assumed in English to refer to the subject of the sentence. In this one, Since their birth Nov. 19, doctors and nurses have noticed distinct differences in the babies, the ready reader will conclude that it was the babies who were born Nov. 19, not the exceptionally precocious doctors and nurses. Usually, the remedy is to place the modifier closer to the word modified: Doctors and nurses have noticed distinct differences in the babies since their birth Nov. 19.

Plurals and possessives When you drive down the street and see the charming shingle hanging from a mailbox that says The Smith’s, you can be confident that the Smiths were inattentive in English class. We do not form the plurals of singular nouns by adding ’s. If the mailbox next door proclaims The Jones’, that family is no better off. Here’s the pattern: Singular Smith Jones Plural Smiths Joneses Singular possessive Smith’s Jones’s or Jones’ Plural possessive Smiths’ Joneses’

Punctuation of clauses Compound sentences — two independent clauses separated by the coordinating conjunctions and, but or or — must be joined by a comma: He filed the story, and she began to edit it with trepidation. Compound predicates — a single subject with two or more verbs — do not require a comma: She opened the story and grimaced in alarm. Why many writers reverse these patterns is an enduring mystery.

The comma-splice run-on sentence — two independent clauses linked by a mere comma — is commonplace in British English but still deplored in American English. Use the damn semicolon; that’s what it’s for. Obnoxious pleonasms If you have been reading these dispatches, you should know better than to get me started on redundant expressions that betray the writer’s inattention to what he or she is saying: safe haven, mass exodus, free gift, advance planning, end result and a multitude of others.

Failed distinctions If you can tell the difference between imply and infer, comprise and compose, go to the head of the class. To imply is to hint or suggest. The root ply, or fold, from the Latin plicare, suggests that meaning is folded into a sentence. To infer, from the Latin inferre, to bring or carry in, is to draw the meaning out of the sentence. At your birthday, you wouldn’t mistake the action of putting a gift into a box for the act of taking a gift out of a box. Why, then, would you confuse the parallel actions of imply and infer?

Comprise means to include or contain. The alphabet comprises 26 letters. Compose means to make up on constitute. The alphabet is composed of 26 letters. The phrase is comprised of is an error at all times and in all places.

Confusion of homonyms Lead (a verb pronounced as leed) and lead (a verb pronounced as led) are homographs; they are spelled the same but have different pronunciations and meanings. Writers frequently use lead as the past tense of to lead, and the spell-check function on your computer will not touch it. Lead (a noun pronounced as led) and led (the past tense of lead) are homophones; they are pronounced the same but have different spellings and meanings. Don’t bother me for an exhaustive list. Go to Alan Cooper’s Homonyms.

Persistence in superstitions If you are still contorting sentences to keep from leaving prepositions at the end, or to move adverbs from their rightful place between the auxiliary and the main verb, or to avoid split infinitives, or to keep since from meaning because, just stop it. These are all superstitions of usage that have been repeatedly exploded. Buy Garner’s Modern American Usage, read the entry on Superstitions, and clean up your act.

Posted by John McIntyre at 12:51 PM | | Comments (6)


Terrific article for which I thank you. Two other grammatical errors annoy me. The first is the incorrect use "you and I" after a preposition such as "between" - example, "Just between you and I, she's a bit odd." The second is the use of plural verbs with the word "none" as the noun. Regardless of how many items are referenced in the prepositional phrase following "none," the corresponding verb should be singular. "None of the 200 guests was willing to leave" is correct; using "were" is not. Remember that "none" is an elision of "no" and "one" and you'll be set.

JEM: Many thanks for the kind words, but I am going to differ with you on the second point. "None" can be either singular or plural depending on context. You might have a look at the post "Now Hear this," in the archives from May 30 of this year.

A plethora of thank you's (not, thank yous, I surmise), especially for the item on "superstitions." Would that I had this weapon in my arsenal four or five years ago! I was a technical editor at an engineering firm, and a few engineers (not verbal engineers, mind you) had a veritable fetish that prohibited any constructions with any words breaking up auxiliary verbs. I am sure it all stemmed from their dread of the split infinitive. Despite my pious efforts to exorcise their fetishistic superstitions, they insisted on knowing more about editing than I did about engineering.

How many writers still understand context? And why do ingnorami persist in beginning sentences with "myself and my husband..."? AAAAARRRRGGGH

It's amazing how many of the grammatical errors you've mentioned are so commonly found in day-to-day discourse. These simple rules that I've written off as common-sense seem to have been lost to so many. I see all of this, and I am a college-age man born into the MTV/e-mail/text-message generation.

With all that said, I'll probably post this and find that I've slipped a few errors into this message. It would make for perfect irony since I'm trying to be a copy editor myself.


The comma-splice run-on sentence — two independent clauses linked by a mere comma — is commonplace in British English but still deplored in American English. Use the damn semicolon; that’s what it’s for.

Indeed. Thanks. Use the damn semicolon!

IMHO, writing has gotten sloppier, at least as far as grammar goes, because as a society our verbal skills have gotten sloppier, or less formal.

Way back in junior high English class, my teacher often admonished us to go with what sounded right to our ear. I doubt teachers say that any longer as there are so few models of verbal correctness to follow.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About John McIntyre
John McIntyre, mild-mannered editor for a great metropolitan newspaper, has fussed over writers’ work, to sporadic expressions of gratitude, for thirty years. He is The Sun’s night content production manager and former head of its copy desk. He also teaches editing at Loyola University Maryland. A former president of the American Copy Editors Society, a native of Kentucky, a graduate of Michigan State and Syracuse, and a moderate prescriptivist, he writes about language, journalism, and arbitrarily chosen topics. If you are inspired by a spirit of contradiction, comment on the posts or write to him at
Baltimore Sun Facebook page

Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Stay connected