baltimoresun.com

« All the answers | Main | Get rid of it »

Tossing the glove

Settle back — don’t rock the boat— and check your sunscreen as we paddle through some backwaters of the English language.

I mentioned “young men running the gantlet (NOT gauntlet)” in a previous post

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/mcintyre/blog/2007/05/nothing_
about_rush_limbaugh.html

that led a reader to comment: “I don’t have a hardcopy dictionary handy here (sorry), but the couple of online dictionaries I checked show ‘gantlet’ as a variant spelling of ‘gauntlet.’”

That is the simplest explanation, a variation in spelling, and it is not wrong. But wait — there’s more.

A gauntlet is a glove, originally a leather glove covered with metal plates, worn by knights in armor. The word crept into English from the French in the 15th century and survives today as a kind of long glove and in a metaphor. The metaphor rises from the chivalric practice of issuing a challenge by throwing down a gauntlet. Chivalry is long gone, but we still say throw down the gauntlet to mean issue a challenge and take up the gauntlet to mean accept the challenge.

A gantlet is a trial by ordeal, originally military, in which one person runs between two rows of men who strike him with objects as he passes. As with knightly challenges, we don’t do that much anymore, but the word survives metaphorically to represent a punishing ordeal.

We got gantlet from the Swedes, not the French; the word gatlopp (road, running course) metamorphosed into English in the 17th century as gantlope, then gantlet. (You can check for yourself in the Oxford English Dictionary, if your eyes can hold out.)

Gantlope and gantlet swiftly merged into gauntlet in an age that had no standardized orthography. The process, Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage comments, was folk etymology, “the substitution of a familiar word for an unfamiliar one.”

And from that point the authorities have diverged. Merriam-Webster insists that any attempt to maintain a distinction between gauntlet and gantlet is misguided and futile. Garner’s Modern American Usage says that the trend is to use gauntlet for both senses, adding, “Like many trends, this one is worth resisting; keep gantlet for the ordeal.” In that, Garner stands with Theodore Bernstein and John Bremner, two stalwarts of a past generation who insist on the distinction. R.W. Burchfield’s revision of Fowler’s Modern English Usage says simply that gantlet is a variant spelling found in American English.

When the gods quarrel, mortals have to make choices. I like the gauntlet/gantlet distinction and follow it in my own writing. I enforce it at The Sun because it remains lodged in the AP Stylebook and our in-house stylebook, and no one cares enough to lobby for a change. What you want to do is, of course, entirely up to you.

Posted by John McIntyre at 11:57 AM | | Comments (3)
        

Comments

Then there's the situation, probably now rare, where parallel railroad tracks are interlaced -- the reason would be to have the maximum clearance in both directions in a tunnel, or to center the weight of heavy trains on a bridge, or maybe some other situation involving close clearances in an urban setting.

"Gantlet track".

If trains were coming from opposite directions onto the gantlet track, there would be what amounted to a head-on collision though they were each on a physically separate line of track.

FWIW, as we say.

Aye, but this may be one where we have to stop throwing down the gauntlet. It now appears the usage panels in American Heritage 4th favor the "au" flavor (if I read it correctly). The hard copy is elsewhere, but I remembered reading it, and the AHD entry in Dictionary.com seems to concur:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gantlet

This will probably be another distinction that passes on in a decade.

Loved your reply and all the information - especially as I had never heard the word gantlet used before. I shall make sure to use it in an ever so casual manner in conversation with my husband who, although a walking dictionary, will no doubt be impressed!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About John McIntyre
John McIntyre, mild-mannered editor for a great metropolitan newspaper, has fussed over writers’ work, to sporadic expressions of gratitude, for thirty years. He is The Sun’s night content production manager and former head of its copy desk. He also teaches editing at Loyola University Maryland. A former president of the American Copy Editors Society, a native of Kentucky, a graduate of Michigan State and Syracuse, and a moderate prescriptivist, he writes about language, journalism, and arbitrarily chosen topics. If you are inspired by a spirit of contradiction, comment on the posts or write to him at john.mcintyre@baltsun.com.
Baltimore Sun Facebook page
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Stay connected