baltimoresun.com

« That which we dispute | Main | A singular controversy »

Strict construction

A reader complained about the headline on an article about the United Nations report on the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, U.S. rebuts report on Guantanamo, saying:

“The word ‘rebut’ means to refute or disprove. The article cites no evidence put forward by U.S. officials to disprove or contradict the allegations in the UN report. Rather, the article states that U.S. officials ‘rejected’ the report, ‘blocked consideration of [ICRC] reports,’ ‘won't publicly discuss’ what has been done to prisoners in their control. This is not ‘rebuttal.’ Unless the headline writers and the reporter have all misunderstood the meaning of the term rebuttal, use of this term in this context  is very disturbing. … To say that the US has ‘rebutted’ the UN's allegations of mistreatment of prisoners appears to be whitewashing at best.” 

The reader is quite right that the strict meaning of rebut means to oppose an assertion while supplying supporting information. It would probably have been better for the headline to use the word reject, as the article does.

That said, there is a looser sense of rebut, meaning to dispute or oppose in reply. That loose senses of the word are common can be seen in the reader’s own letter and in dictionaries, where refute is given as a synonym of rebut. But to refute is a stronger term in its strictest sense; it means to disprove conclusively. Very few arguments are ever conclusively overturned, so we tend to avoid that term altogether.

Whether to allow a loose use of a word or to adhere to the strictest sense can be a difficult question of judgment for writers and editors, and there is always room for discussion. We take a hard line on imply/infer, despite entries in some dictionaries that register them as synonyms. As a previous posting pointed out, we have given ground on to host.

The reader had a concluding question, “Are headlines written at the Sun or are they just reprinted along with the stories from the other newspapers?”

For good or ill, our own copy editors write the headlines for the paper. When we are right, we stand by them. When we are wrong, we take our medicine.

Posted by John McIntyre at 8:50 AM | | Comments (0)
        

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About John McIntyre
John McIntyre, mild-mannered editor for a great metropolitan newspaper, has fussed over writers’ work, to sporadic expressions of gratitude, for thirty years. He is The Sun’s night content production manager and former head of its copy desk. He also teaches editing at Loyola University Maryland. A former president of the American Copy Editors Society, a native of Kentucky, a graduate of Michigan State and Syracuse, and a moderate prescriptivist, he writes about language, journalism, and arbitrarily chosen topics. If you are inspired by a spirit of contradiction, comment on the posts or write to him at john.mcintyre@baltsun.com.
Baltimore Sun Facebook page
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Stay connected