Instant debate feedback
I'm getting some feedback on the debate from readers now.
From Joe Outside The Beltway: "How’s this for arrogance? I see no need to watch the debate and am avoiding all reporting on it. I have nothing more to learn. Senator McBush is an impulsive, irrational “shoot-from-the hip” representative of a political party that has done enormous harm to our country, and that should be run out of town at the first opportunity -- coming up soon. It is astounding that so many Americans seem unable to grasp this. You see how arrogant I am? I might watch Palin (McBush’s most irrational act ever!) simply for the (tragic) humor in it."
Here's Lisa, also not watching: "These debates are only worthwhile if you've been living in a cave and know nothing about either candidate. How can anyone possibly be on the fence or undecided at this point? What kind of a moron are you if you're still undecided about two such entirely opposite candidates, two such entirely opposite philosophies, this late in the game?? Lemme guess -- the kind who brought us 8 years of George Bush! It's all pre-programmed talking points. I know which candidate I'm voting for, and I don't need these stage-managed 'debates' to tell me anything else about him or his hapless opponent."
The Arizona Kid says: "The Cubs and the Brewers are tied 1-1 in the top of the 6th."
South Shore Joey (Generation Y): "Does Senator McCain have bullet points in front of him that he's trying to hit? He was asked if he was going to vote for the current bailout plan and just said, 'Sure but...' That sound frighteningly Bush-like. I thought this wasn't four more years of Bush." Through most of this campaign I've dismissed rude McCain ads as the ugly necessity of politics. He's never been my candidate as I simply disagree with most of his political views and ideas of government, but he's always been a hero. But I've never been so disappointed in a politician as I have been these past few days over John McCain's utter buffooner with the attempts to postpone the debate in the name of economic resolution. I assumed I was desensitized to being talked down-to by the candidates. I was wrong."
Sounds like these people already have made up their minds.







Comments
Dan,
Just in response to Lisa's comments about "how can you be undecided still," I have to speak up.
I've never heard anything less democratic, really. To begin with, the debates are worthwhile. Far more worthwhile than anything you hear nightly about a candidate or hear in an ad or read on their websites. At least in these debates we get to see them side-by-side, forced to face the questions and answers. And if they sidestep, we'll know and we'll judge.
But secondly, I am undecided and for good reason. And I hope no one thinks that these decisions are ever easy. I love Obama's message of hope, but I question his ability to actually make it happen. I also question his judgment. I lean more towards McCain's politics (or his politics of old), but I want more change than he is promising. Like most, I certainly don't want eight more years of Bush.
Yeah, the candidates are pretty far apart. But that doesn't make it easy when you're in the middle... do I choose ideology or practicality? Theory or reality?
Heaven forbid that anyone finds a middle ground.
Posted by: Dandcm | September 26, 2008 11:41 PM
Amen to Dan and his statement! Obviously an individual with some maturity and insightful thinking. We need many more like him to help this country make logical and "rational" decisions about its future!
Posted by: AJ | September 27, 2008 12:29 AM