I've already received numerous e-mail comments on today's column on the decision by Archbishop O'Brien to pull Father Ray Martin out of his three South Baltimore parishes for seemingly minor offenses. I've asked the letter-writers for permission to publish their comments here and, as I get their OKs, I'll post them. Others should feel free to add their comments to this blog.
I went to Catholic schools from third grade through college. I am pretty close to a couple of priests and am a practicing Catholic. But what is "my" church coming to? Is this what the Baltimore diocese needs in a leader? Cardinal Keeler set such great example for many years. I hope The Sun keeps this issue alive!
Ed Casey
You were waaaay too kind on O'Bren. I am Catholic myself and see Cardinal O'Brien as nothing more than another church bureaucrat who is in dire need of a very long retreat to find Jesus. To end on a positive note I have to say that most Catholics that I know are nothing like Cardinal O'Brien. Thank God!
Best Regards,
Pat Mayhorga
Columbia, MD
Given the handling of Father Martin and Father Doyle, I wouldn't be surprised if you were forbidden to receive communion in this archdiocese just because you think that, just possibly, our new archbishop is fallible. If the archbishop keeps losing priests, he may also lose many of the Catholics he is supposed to guide. I was a great admirer of Cardinal Keeler because of his humble approach to leadership; I am not at all impressed with his replacement.
Sincerely,
Patricia Walz,
member of St. Patrick's in Havre de Grace
I appreciate your article in today's paper. I do not know Ray Martin, and I
am not a Catholic. I do, however, know "the Church," and part of the tragedy
of this absurd action is that in all probability the active priesthood of
Ray Martin is coming to an end. He can not argue his case. He can not
object. He can not get a "hearing" by objective people. All he can do is
apologize, repent, be humiliated, go off to a monastery in "obedience" and
promise to be a good boy from now on. Or he can resign from the priesthood.
He can't go back to his parishioners in Locust Point; that will not be
allowed. He will be reassigned to who knows where---Garrett County? He
apparently was a good pastor and a good community leader, an advocate of
unity, compassion, community harmony---all the positive "articles of the
faith." For this he is being punished. It will eat at him, and eat at him
until in due time he can't take it any more. The institution has betrayed
him and it will abandon him. He will face the need to find employment in
some field for which he was not educated and trained, and he will get no
help in the process. He will nonetheless survive and join the ranks of
former Catholic priests. But why? What a stupid, intolerant, despicable act.
David Pardoe
In regards to your article "Church loses sight of the
big picture." As a way of example: I, as an employee at my company,
am expected to read my employee handbook and to
implement the rules of the company as stated by senior
management. If this is a problem for me, I might want
to consider quitting and going to another corporation.
Roman Catholic priests agree to obey cannon law. From
reports I've read, Father Martin reportedly let Pastor
Chappell,a non-Catholic priest, read from the Gospel
and then encouraged her to receive communion. I don't
have to remind you that these are violations of the
Catholic Church's laws. Why does it seem harsh that
the Archbishop of Baltimore would want his priests to
follow Church law? I am expected by my boss to follow
company law - if I don't there are consequences.
The Catholic Church is not the local rotary club - it
as a private Church of believers who expect its clergy
and baptized lay people to be in communion with its
doctrine. The Church does not have to be "tolerant" in
the sense that it must violate its sacred beliefs,
dogma and traditions for those outside the Church or
those Catholics in opposition to the church to feel
"comfortable." As to the question of whether you or anyone else will
go to hell or not - I think to preface your article
with such a question is real really a cheap shot,
which shows your prejudices up front. Hell is not the
issue at hand and the eternal salvation of individuals
is not something Catholics toss about casually. It is
a serious matter between God and that individual.
Please refrain from sensationalizing matters of faith.
Please stop expecting the Catholic Church to mimic the
increasingly liberal and secular society that
surrounds it. I respect that you may be non-Catholic
or a fallen-away Catholic - but I can't understand why
you use your position to slam the Church.
Respectfully,
Robert Fay
An Episcopal priest (woman!) reading the Gospel.! .Mother Church proves once again that the people have not fallen away from the church-----the church has fallen away from the people.No spin can be put on this one. The Catholic World News tried with the term "liturgical abuse". Forget the concept of community, forget the true meaning of Christianity, forget the very idea of 'reaching out'. To use 'violations' and 'abuse' as part of the Catholic prosecutors lawyer-speak is the most delicious, yet tragic , of ironies. "I have a dream" that many of the Catholic parishioners will waltz (NO jitterbugging) out of their respective parishes and go join the Episcopal church. Even if their priest is a woman. Talk about a tempest in a communion cup. And, the spy who came in from the funeral mass is a coward beyond description. Let that person, or persons, claim their part. Just in case, God forbid, I ever meet this informer, I want to know so I can leave the room. Betty Walter