baltimoresun.com

« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »

March 30, 2007

Hi, Hi, Blackbirds!

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, Baltimorons and everyone in the Villes -- Cockeysville, Dickeyville, Poolesville, Clarksville, Scaggsville and Baynesville -- you have a new football team. If you have not been following closely, or listening to the radio, you might have missed the news. But the Baltimore Blackbirds have their first home game in the First Mariner Arena (The Marina!!) tomorrow night. They play the Carolina Speed. The Birds are 0-3 on the season so far, and they lost one game by something approaching 80 points. Talk about a spread!

Les Oiseaux Noir play indoor football, which is something like poor man's arena football, but we'll take it.

Are you following me? We actually have an indoor football team in Baltimore. They play in the American Indoor Football Association.

I find this very exciting -- a new team in Baltimore, and something besides soccer in The Marina -- and I would go if not for a previous engagement with a hamburger. Had I known, I might have changed my plans for this inaugural home game.

See you at the second home game next month, April 14, and again April 29. There's a Monday night game in May. Good stuff. Indoor football at The Marina -- bring it! Now we just need a franchise in the East Coast Hockey League.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 1:35 PM | | Comments (2)
        

March 29, 2007

Rehabbin' Baltimore

Love this e-mail from one of dozens who wrote this morning:

Why isn't our government making Baltimore the Rehab Capital of the country, instead of the Heroin Capital?  If we floated one-tenth the number of bonds to fund rehab, as we do to fund stadiums, we could really make Baltimore special.    --  Steve McDonald

Please note: Thursday's column, and the legislation it addressed, was about low-level, two-time-loser drug offenders, not the chronic serial offender this reader describes:

Three years ago this month my home was broken into by a drug addict.  Since that time I've become my neighborhood's crime chairman, the Vice President of Baltimore City's Southern District Police Community Relations Council and the co-organizer of the Southern District's award-winning Citizens on Patrol program.  It is through these activities that I first met Delegate Brian McHale.
This past Monday, Brian called me from the floor of the House of Delegates as discussion began on legislation to parole those convicted of drug offenses early.  He wanted to know again how many times the individual who had broken into my house had been arrested.  At last count "John Doe" has been arrested or given a criminal citation over 50 times within the last eight years.  One of his most recent arrests - for stealing the purse of his court appointed drug counselor.  There is no doubt that John Doe needs drug counseling. There is also no doubt that when John Doe is out of jail he will continue his crime streak to feed his habit.  While he is not a violent criminal, (his offenses include auto theft, theft from auto, burglary and drug possession) he still has victims.   
What Delegate McHale and many others including myself want is the expansion of drug counseling while these individuals are in jail.  I agree that we can not arrest our way out of a drug epidemic but I know our communities are safer if addicts receive treatment while incarcerated.  -- Shannon Sullivan

More comment from readers:

I am a Recovering Person who was addicted to various substances including heroin and other opiates.  I was fortunate to attend Treatment in 1981 and has been drug and alcohol free since that time.  I am involved with treatment of addictions and has been doing so since 1983 in various  capacities.  Currently I am the Court Liaison for Gaudenzia of Maryland and can give testimonies that  our City and State have been ravaged by the Disease of Addiction.  I have witnessed in the criminal justice system that Treatment for  persons who are activity addicted to Drugs and alcohol and involved in the system is a Major component to revamping the system and saving our communities and citizens.  In my daily and sometimes hourly "fight" to maintain abstinence  and practicing  principles, I have found that my treatment experience and subsequent involvement with 12-step support groups, consistent prayer and  helping others has discounted that old myth, " Once an addict always an addict and that " we " Don't Recover.  WELL, WE ADDICTS AND ALCOHOLICS DO RECOVERY AND we can Heal !!!!.  You are absolutely correct that  "WE can NOT ARREST OUR WAY OUT OF THIS DILEMMA "  We need the POWERS-TO- BE to recognize that their previous efforts have been unsuccessful, we need more opportunities for treatment and less opportunities for INCARCERATION.
My life-experiences have shown me that when a person achieves a measure of Recovery or even a chance for treatment they should imagine the POSSIBILITIES !! I in my own life had the spiritual Light bulb go off when I was in treatment and others assisted me with Busting through my denial and breaking the bondage of Drug Addiction.  Once again I say with pride and conviction that WE ADDICTS AND ALCOHOLICS DO RECOVER!!  The proof is in the
growth and success of N.A. and A.A. and the many, may Recovering Persons not only in this city and state but all over the world.  Before closing I would beg to differ with you on one point that you made in your article-  "RELAPSE IS A PART OF RECOVERY "  I have found that that statement is INCORRECT.  Doing my 25 years and some days of recovery I have observed that - " RELAPSE IS A PART OF THE ILLNESS OF ADDICTION AND THAT WHEN THIS ILLNESS IS TAKEN LIGHTLY AND MINIMIZED IT CAN BECOME FATAL. That is a true Fact.  We can and do recover, but some have died so others can live.  -- Charles Cockrell, Jr.

It's so devastating that we give addicts food and housing on demand (commit a criime, we'll house and feed you) but cannot see our way clear to giving them treatment on demand for as often as they ask for it.

I am always interested to read your columns about drug addiction in Baltimore City . I am a suburban ex-soccer mom whose son returned from college addicted to heroin. He came home to remove himself from the situation on his rural campus and immediately discovered a carnival of heroin 10 minutes from our home. He has been fighting his addiction off and on for a year and it is an epic battle. I constantly think of how hard it is for him with so many resources to try to beat this addiction- what happens to those who must wait for such long periods of time for help? He was arrested twice in a week last summer in a part of Baltimore where he should never have been. He was on probation this fall  but as you mentioned- relapse is a crime ,not part of the progressive journey toward recovery in the eyes of the court. He is lucky enough to be sentenced to drug court- BUT the sentencing happened on Feb 22 and the first hearing is not until May 1. He is fortunate- we pay for him to see a therapist, a psychiatrist and a doctor who can prescribe Suboxone.  All of these interventions are not even enough- he slips back sometimes for short periods. 

I spend my days in Baltimore City- visiting new teachers in the schools and supporting them in every way I can. I see the addicts and the dealers on the streets and in the alleys ( sometimes I have to wait behind them at the corner while men in work trucks  buy their daily hits).   It is scary for me to think of how difficult or nearly impossible it must be for the people I see to get the support they need to quit.   Thanks for speaking up for all of the people who have this disease of addiction. Keep up your solitary cry.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 12:19 PM | | Comments (0)
        

March 26, 2007

Christopher Clarke, RIP

Responding to Sunday's column, a Sun reader writes:

I was in downtown Balto watching a play at IND with my 4-year-old. Meanwhile, my husband took my 2 year old down the street to play at a nearby playground. A bunch of black men were harrassing them and it pissed me off. I don't consider myself a racist. I support STRIVE DC and hope to donate to STRIVE Balto etc.  . . . but I thought to myself: Why are black people forever bitching about the white man, when God knows a white person can't step into a black neighborhood without being harrassed? It's so tempting to lump all black people together (I'm always telling my husband not to...) Thanks for reminding me not to judge all people of a race just because of all the drug dealers. Not all of them want that life. So many are trying so hard to rise above the difficult circumstances in their lives. I'm so sorry for the loss of this wonderful young man. Thanks for this critical reminder. There's no room for racism and cynicism in this critical fight.

From Tedd Nunn in Columbia:

People in Maryland and around the country are already working to find creative ways of stemming the tide of violence, so we can get to the point where the tragedy of Christopher Clark would stand out instead of just being so much noise in the background of a violent society. Unfortunately, the voices of sanity, reason, and creativity are often shouted down or otherwise marginalized as being impractical or utopian. "Violence is part of human nature," is an argument we often hear as our ideas are being dismissed. I would suggest that conflict is a part of the human experience, but that our choice to respond either violently or nonviolently is a result of what we have been taught or, more likely, what we have not been taught. 
Just last week, the Maryland House of Delegates Health and Government Operations committee voted down a proposal to establish a task force that would promote peaceful and nonviolent ways of resolving conflict in the state (Maryland House Bill #902). I don't know why this no-cost bill was defeated, but I think this might be a good place for some investigative reporting. If they are not supporting this type of measure, what else are our elected officials doing to make sure the next Christopher Clark tragedy is averted?
On the national front, there is a movement afoot to create a U.S. Department of Peace and Nonviolence. House bill 808 would establish a cabinet-level department in the federal government that would be responsible for researching, articulating and disseminating programs that would address gang violence, domestic violence and other tragic aspects of our society where proven nonviolent techniques would make a positive difference if they could be more broadly applied. So far, Representative Albert Wynn (Maryland District #4) and Representative Elijah Cummings (Maryland District #7) have stepped forward in support of this visionary legislation. Where is Steny Hoyer on this? Where is Senator Mikulski? Again, if our other Representatives and Senators are not going to support this specific legislation, what else are they going to do help counter rampant violence in our society?
Although I am deeply saddened by what happened to Christopher Clark, I am heartened by your call to not let this incident go by without some reflection and, hopefully, action. Please continue to use your media voice to encourage people who would hope to see a different type of society and stimulate the exchange of ideas that can make this happen. We need to use all means at our disposal to create the culture of peace, nonviolence and sanity that everyone wants.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 7:56 AM | | Comments (2)
        

March 24, 2007

Eddie Norris

"And Ed Norris, the former Baltimore police commissioner who was convicted of using thousands of dollars from an obscure department account to finance extramarital affairs, meals and shopping trips, has his own radio show now and gets to use the airwaves each day to tell people what a [expletive] sham the case against him was."

Apparently Ed Norris didn't like this statement from my Thursday column and said so on his radio show Thursday. (By the way, thanks to the hundreds of readers who wrote here this week to say nice things about that column.) The former Commish apparently told his WHFS-FM listeners -- I say "apparently" because I didn't hear it myself -- that what I'd written was wrong. A handful of loyal Norris listeners reported this to me by e-mail, and a couple used the opportunity for an attack of their own:

"Typical journalist," one of them wrote. "Why don't you try getting your facts straight - I know you leftists like to play loose and fast with the truth, but c'mon... If you decide to check the facts, you might just find that Mr. Norris was convicted only of mortgage fraud - for essentially showing a $9000 loan form his father as a gift.  A far sight from what you claim.  By the way - he paid back all the monies in question. Don't call me a shill for Norris either.  Just make an attempt to find the truth once in awhile."

Certainly sounds like a shill to me, and an uninformed one.

For the record, here are some excerpts from the The Sun story of March 9, 2004:

Norris, 43, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Baltimore to conspiring to misuse money from a supplemental city police fund and lying on tax returns. The former city police commissioner and Maryland state police superintendent is now a convicted felon. The federal charges against Norris grew from an off-the-books police expense account, which court records show Norris used to pay for extramarital encounters with several women and to satisfy an apparent taste for the good life.

Norris stood stiffly throughout the half-hour court hearing, his hands folded in front of him, and said little beyond answering questions from U.S. District Judge Richard D. Bennett about whether he understood the charges against him, his possible punishment and the implications of his felony conviction.

   "Did you in fact commit the offenses as summarized by the government?" Bennett asked Norris at one point.
   "As summarized," Norris replied.
   Asked by Bennett what his plea was to the conspiracy charge and to the tax violation, Norris answered twice in a low voice, "Guilty."

Last I checked, when a defendant enters a guilty plea, and the judge accepts the plea, the defendant is therefore convicted of the crime. He becomes a convicted felon.

I like Norris' radio show -- and these days, I actually have a chance to listen more -- but he should really bag the whining about how the feds  [expletive] him.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 5:54 AM | | Comments (2)
        

March 21, 2007

Lax Under Attax

The latest issue of Lacrosse magazine contains a "Parting Shot" essay that smacks of the most laughable kind of old-school classism, affirming in just a few dozen words every cynic's view of lacrosse as an elitist, rich-white-boy sport. The author is Brooke Tunstall, National Hall of Famer who played for Hopkins in the 1940s and apparently a self-appointed guardian of his sport's blue-bloodline. As a work of writing in the English language, the essay is sophomore stuff, and much of it is trite. Yet it manages to makes Tunstall's main point early. The good thing is, you only have to read through the second paragraph to get what he's is trying to say.

After stating that he's "thrilled" with lacrosse's growing popularity across the country, Tunstall confesses unease that more and more prols have armed themselves with sticks, and that his beloved sport is under cultural assault.

"Do all these newcomers really understand what is most valuable and unique about the game? Is the true spirit of lacrosse spreading far and wide, along with the paraphernalia, hype and glamour? Or is there, almost inevitably, a diminution of the essential character and culture of this remarkable sport, as it diversifies geographically and socio-economically?"

I'd like to be able to tell you that Tunstall answers these questions because, had he done so, I'd probably have more richly pretentious prose to quote here. But, alas, he chickens out, and the rest of the essay is filled with boring reminiscences of the good old days and how Tunstall and his band of privileged brothers understood and honored, better than most of us apparently, the values of teamwork, honesty, integrity and selflessness.
It's a real snore. But, in terms of making its essential point -- as lacrosse becomes more popular, the great unwashed will be involved, not just fertilizing the fields but actually playing on them -- Tunstall succeeds in warning his superior generation of the looming threat. Run for your lives! The prols are bearing long poles!

While we're on the subject of lacrosse and class and all that jazz . . . . Here's a note from someone whoi has been listening to all the backlash blather against the prosecutor in the Duke sexual assault case: "Lost in people's outrage over the ambitious prosecutor is even more necessary outrage about the tawdry nature of what these preppy boys did, calling across town to the historically black college to get their stripper. I bet powerful Wall Street types are getting in line to offer these boys six-figure jobs. Ticks me off that this kind of behavior all of a sudden makes these guys darlings of the rich and powerful."

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 8:59 AM | | Comments (1)
        

March 20, 2007

March tonight in Belair-Edison

After last week's fatal shooting in their Northeast Baltimore neighborhood, residents of Belair-Edison will be on the march against violence tonight at 6:30 P.M at the corner of Belair Road and Cliftmont Ave. Here's a message from Melodye Watson, Community Organizer for Belair-Edison Neighborhoods, Inc.:

I read your column this past Sunday. I agree with you that it is time to speak up about all the violence that happens in Baltimore. I live and work in the community where last week's fatal shooting of Christopher Clarke occured. Residents in Belair-Edison are outraged. They are also scared. But we will put our fear aside and do something about gun violence. When I heard about the shootings on Cliftmont Avenue, I wasn't surprised. Murder is common and unfortunately I, like many others, have gotten used to it -- especially here in Baltimore.  Even the media coverage of these shootings seemed commonplace, ".....and by the way, another young black guy shot some other young black guys and one of them died."

Dan, I'd like for you to know that residents in Belair-Edison are outraged. We realize that City resources are limited, that the police are overwhelmed and that if we don't do something now more lives will be lost. The Belair-Edison  Community Association has organized a peace walk and prayer vigil on Cliftmont Avenue for this evening. The events is the kick off to our own block by block strategy to reducing crime and improving our neighborhood. We realize that we can't wait for Mayor Dixon or Police Commissioner Hamm do put any programs in place to quell the problems in our neighborhood.

We live here and we want to live in peace. We don't want to move out to the county or Pennsylvania. It's too expensive We realize the great potential of our neighborhood and its affordability. We are not going to be run out by kids with guns, drug dealers, or rats. Starting today with our peace walk, we will begin our campaign to organize as many blocks in Belair-Edison to clean it up and keep it safe. We will be door knocking every weekend on as many doors as possible to ask our neighbors to participate in clean ups, to participate in citizens on patrol, to complete block projects, and to just come out and talk to one another. Our strategy is really quite simple. We realize that we have got to get people here involved and concerned about our neighborhood and each other.

For more information about tonight's march and vigil, contact: Tony Dawson, President, Belair-Edison Community Association, 3412 Belair Road, 443-622-9700, or beca3412@hotmail.com.
 

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 11:56 AM | | Comments (0)
        

March 15, 2007

A Lenten homily

Homily delivered last Sunday at St. Matthew Roman Catholic Church, Baltimore, by the Rev. Joseph Muth:

Lent is a time of repentance, forgiveness, and reconciliation and these themes continue in the readings this weekend.

I begin with Psalm 137
“Beside the rivers of Babylon we thought about Jerusalem
and we sat down and cried.
We hung our small harps on the willow trees.
Our enemies had brought us here (to this place)
as their prisoners, and now they wanted us to sing and entertain them.
They insulted us and shouted, ‘Sing about Zion!’
Here in a foreign land, how can we sing about the Lord?

Jerusalem, if I forget you, let my right hand wither.
Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth if I don’t
think about you above all else.”

In today’s gospel, Jesus says that those who were killed by the falling tower (of Siloam) were no more guilty than those who were not.  Turn Back to God!!
Those who were killed because their blood was mixed at the sacrifice were no more guilty than others. Turn back to God!! 

Jesus says, “You will all come to the same end unless you repent.” This statement is not directed only to individuals but to the nation of Israel.  Suppose this message was also directed to the Nation of America.  Do you think America needs to hear a similar challenge and call?  Unless you repent you will perish.

At the end of the second reading we are told that even if you think you are standing upright (another translation says “standing up to temptation”) watch out lest you fall.
Does America need to hear this message??
-- We all live under the illusion and have been tempted by the same temptation to think that America is great and can do whatever it wants in the world, wherever, and to whomever, with no repercussions. 
-- The illusion and temptation that America is like the burning bush.  There is fire all around but we are not consumed.  The fire goes on but we are untouchable.
-- The illusion and temptation that we can protect ourselves from violence and evil on the outside when our city and county streets run with blood on the inside.
-- The illusion and temptation that if we lock up, detain, oppress, arrest, and build walls to keep aliens, foreigners and immigrants out; we will be the America that we used to be and long to be---we will at last be safe.
-- The illusion and temptation that we can force our will on another nation despite our lack of knowledge of who they are.
-- The illusion and temptation that we can put yellow ribbons and flag ribbons on our cars that say 'Support our Troops,' while that very nation treats those same troops shamefully when they are wounded and transported to Walter Reed Hospital.
-- The illusion and temptation that we are a blessed, righteous, and holy nation and yet are too afraid to tell our leaders to stop----we’ve had enough----and not in my name!!

If we just go on singing our patriotic songs and live our life all will be well.
How can I sing songs about the Lord, the songs of Zion, the songs of America in an America I do not recognize?  How do I sing these songs when our country has become a foreign land?

I know America, I love America.  Americans are very generous, but this is not the America I know and love.
The call of Jesus is to the nation and he gives this call to us for our own nation in our own time.  So if we too are asked to respond to Jesus to turn back to God then maybe we need to use our God-language to understand our predicament.

O Lord, forgive us for how the Iraqi people are treated in our name!!
Forgive us for how our own wounded soldiers are treated in our name!!
We repent, O Lord, because we turn our heads and walk away.
We repent, O Lord, because we do not raise our voices in protest, anguish, and outrage; call on Congress, or write letters
We are complicitous in this evil and we accept our own powerlessness and let it continue so that we can have a safe and secure existence and enjoy our false sense of security that the scriptures tell us about today:
1) The false sense of security in the Old Testament reading whereby people thought that since Yahweh had led them out of the desert they will be fine. They did not realize they still had to be faithful and responsive to the covenant.  They were lulled by God’s action on their behalf.  They were lulled into inaction—God will now do it.
2) The false sense of security in the New Testament; we have Moses, spiritual food and spiritual drink, we can do what we want ---we have it all— even if you think you can stand up to temptations because of what you have, be careful, lest you fall.
3) The false sense of security in the gospel because we are not like those who had their blood mixed, or had the tower fall on them. We are better than they are, after all, they deserved it -- until the towers fell on us one day.
 

When Walter Reed hospital begins to look like the streets of Baghdad what is happening?  We don’t have to worry about another bomb falling from the outside, we now have one tearing us apart from the inside.

The Church itself has been silent too long!!
To rephrase Psalm 137:

         How can I sing about the songs of America
         When I feel like I am in a foreign land?
         America, if I forget who you really are and
        do not point out where you are wrong,
        may my right hand wither.
  If I do not raise my voice may
        my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth
.

On this third Sunday of Lent continue your journey of drawing close to Christ, The Word of Life -- stand for him and do not be lulled like the people of the Old Testament or the New Testament, or the America we now have. Take to heart the word of the old gospel song, “My hope is built on nothing less than Jesus' blood and righteousness  . . . On Christ the solid rock I stand. All other ground is sinking sand—even the American soil . . . all other ground is sinking sand.”

Let your hope help you in the creation of a new America true to its creed!
Let your hope help you in the creation of a Church that will not be silent!
Let your hope remind you that, like Moses tending the flock, God is in your ordinary life!
Let your hope remind you that each and every nation is Holy Ground!

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:21 AM | | Comments (2)
        

March 13, 2007

Chris Simon should be banned for life

Chrissimonhit The NHL hit Chris Simon with a league-record suspension of 25 games for his vicious, two-handed stick attack on the New York Rangers' Ryan Hollweg last Thursday. But the league has missed another opportunity to set a new standard for the sport and for the league. They should have banned this goon. Let him be gone into swift retirement. The league doesn't need him. I'm sure his team can find a replacement. Simon, of the Islanders and once of the Caps, mad-chopped Hollweg to the face with his stick last week, and if you haven't seen the video, click here.

Simon will miss the rest of the regular season and playoffs. Big deal. He should just be gone. It should be Man law.

Simon has been suspended four other times for violence and he received a three-game ban in 1997 after directing a racial slur toward player Mike Grier, one of the few black players in the NHL. Simon's career should be finished.

This kind of stupid violence has no place in the sport -- and everyone keeps saying that, but these attacks keep happening. Simon's madness came on the three-year anniversary of Vancouver Canuck Todd Bertuzzi's brutal attack on Colorado's Steve Moore. The league keeps lengthing suspensions of players who use their sticks to inflict injury to opponents, but it keeps happening. And these are the moments that make the sports shows and get all the views on the Internet. It's what the league is known for, and that's a terrible shame, particularly because the play of the professional game has become so good in recent years, led by some young and fabulous skaters who've brought a new look and excitement to the post-lockout NHL.

As long as NHL tolerates attacks like Simon's -- and a 25-game suspension is toleration, in my book -- then hockey will never reach the vaster audience it seeks, and never become in the public's mind all that it could, the fastest and most exciting sport on earth. The NHL just missed another opportunity to ascend to a whole new level of class and prestige by saying goon be gone.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 7:27 PM | | Comments (5)
        

March 12, 2007

'300' slashing penalties

Blood-spraying Japanese anime meets Gladiator, Gladiator meets Kill Bill, and all the slashing and clanging and speer-chuckin' looks like one long trailer for a PlayStation game. (Which it is!) At moments I wish I'd had a wireless controller. I might have been able to stop some of the decapitations. There were lots of them. Must be a record for decapitations. One Spartan stands there for like an hour while his head rolls around his sandals. The leading man, the one playing King Leonidas, stuck me as a guy who spits when he speaks. I wanted to shower when it was over. Saw it at The Senator. Coach Dave Pietramala and the Hopkins lacrosse team was there. Maybe they're considering a new phalanx-style defense this season. If I were Petro, I'd worry about his guys getting too many slashing penalties at Syracuse this weekend. Would I suggest you pay cash-money to see this film? Only if your only other choice is Renee Zellweger as Beatrix Potter. Seriously, wait for the DVD -- or just get the video game.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 8:04 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Candor from Annapolis

A member of the House of Delegates writes:

The Clean Cars bill is being heralded as a great bicameral success.  And it is a victory. But let's not get carried away:
A) 95% of cars on dealer lots now already comply with the CA standards;
B) the eleven lousy models that comprise the other 5% may very well have been phased out anyway by 2011 if we hadn't done anything b/c they can't be sold in CA, NY, PA, or other big states.
C) it doesn't kick in till 2011.  Other states are passing it this year to kick in in for the 2009 model year, but we decided to wait till 2011 to make the dealers and manufacturers happier.  But because it only affects 5% and doesn't kick in for years, it may not end up affecting anything at all since so many other states are acting.
The Republican legislatures in VA and PA are acknowledged as doing more to
protect the Bay than we are. . . . We bend over backwards to avoid the perception that the enviros or labor or health advocates, etc, are winning too much.  Enviros are told they get abill or two a year, labor gets a bill a year, etc so very different advocates are pitted against each other.  But no one in leadership would dream of telling the Chamber, the Tech Council, the insurers, the restaurants, the Manufacturers Council, the high-tech industries, the local chambers, the NFIB, the anti-union construction contractors, the developers, the tobacco firms, and the banks that they should all get together, decide what one bill they want, and then we'll pass that one.  But leadership does that to labor and enviros and anti-poverty groups, despite the fact that most of the stuff they're pushing is supported by 60-80% of the public.

   

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:38 AM | | Comments (0)
        

More on local farmers

Reader comment on Sunday's column on Community-Supported Agriculture:

We did something similar. Howard County offers a program like that to support Howard County farms, although not all are organic. It was wonderful, the produce was fresh and it was great to know where it came from. Often we got recipes, usually we got at least one item we weren't familiar with so it sure expanded our horizons! And it was fun to see what we'd get each week. The only problem was that my husband and I have no kids, it was just too much produce for two people to use in a week. If you have someone to share any potential surplus with, I know you will love the produce you get! And it does feel very good to support local, small farms. You are correct, I wish someone had thought of this before so many small farms were bulldozed over.
--- Marcia Bresson

I couldn't agree with you more about CSAs. I would love to farm my own veggies in my own backyard, but the job and the family eats up most of my time. I live in Anne Arundel County and have been looking for a CSA to join because I want to support people who are farming responsibly.  Just down the road from me, a farm that's been a part of the county since the 1800s has closed down shop, as the farmer sold out to a developer and his wonderful farm land and peach orchards will be plowed under for more disappointing, overpriced tract homes.  I easily spent $300 last summer and fall buying his family's produce and hoping to stave off the inevitable, but as you so eloquently pointed out in your column--farming is hard, uncertain work.  Places like England and Holland manage to have their villages ringed by farms and green space--how wonderful if we could be so far-sighted. To keep a long-winded screed from getting endless, I'd like you to know that I've forwarded your column via the Baltimore Sun's online link to friends of mine who live out of state, and I'd like to pass on their comments (which I share):  HOORAY for you for pointing this out.
-- Teresa Bennett

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:24 AM | | Comments (1)
        

March 10, 2007

Political Winds and O'Malley

"The conclusion that wind isn't working in Maryland is not a Wayne Rogers issue," said Wayne Rogers, trying to deflect any suggestion in today's story by Tom Pelton that politics might be playing a role in the effort to streamline Maryland's process for licensing wind turbines. But, go figure: Rogers is president of an energy company that has been trying for three years to place a series of wind mills atop a mountain in Western Maryland, a $55 million project. (Not that there's anything wrong with that!) But he's also former chairman of the Maryland Democratic Party and Martin O'Malley made him co-chairman of the transition team that issued a report on Maryland's energy future. (One of its conclusions was that there was too much red tape in efforts to develop sources of renewable energy, like wind power.) I support wind power, and there probably is too much red tape involved in the approval process, and Maryland ought to get up to speed. But does all this sound a little cozy for you? What was that O'Malley said last year about special interests influencing energy regulation in the Ehrlich administration?  So what was he doing putting Rogers, a man trying to win state approval for a controversial project and get a bill passed in Annapolis, on his transition team?

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 3:21 AM | | Comments (1)
        

March 9, 2007

On global warming 'debate'

Always keep in mind that, according to a National Science Foundation survey of American adults, 48 percent believe that dinosaurs and humans lived at the same time.  As Lewis Black says: "These are people who think that The Flintstones was a documentary!!!"

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 7:02 AM | | Comments (3)
        

Brewania

Here's something for Baltimore history buffs -- and for beer lovers, to get them in the mood for St. Patrick's Day. Turkey Joe Trabert, perhaps Baltimore's greatest story teller and a collector of "brewania," will talk about the city's reach brewing history at the Museum of Industry, 1415 Key Highway on Tuesday, Mar. 13th, at 6 p.m. Joe will be joined by another great raconteur, historian Wayne Schaumburg, along with Hugh Sisson, genuine brewmeister and founder of Clipper City Brewery. Here's another inducement: There will be a beer tasting following the discussion.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:49 AM | | Comments (0)
        

March 8, 2007

Wake Up on time Sunday

OK, people. Enough! I was just joking in today's column about making wake-up calls this Sunday morning when we "spring forward" with an earlier-than-usual Daylight Saving Time. My phone has been ringing all day. (I am half-tempted to call all of you at about 5 am Sunday!)

Meanwhile, here's an amusing e-mail on the subject from a guy we call Matt The Jester (because his real name is Matt Jester, making his full name, Matt "Matt The Jester" Jester).

Hey Dan-
I think you're passing up on a great (or at least lucrative) opportunity here. "THE DAN RODRICKS' WAKE-UP SERVICE"!!! You can almost picture the ad (which, or course, is pitched by some no-name British actor).

"Tired of that dreary ol' alarm clock not waking you up in the mornin'?
       Well , have I got good news for you!
       The New Dan Rodricks Wake-up service!!!!!!!
          Guaranteed to wake you with a smile!
                  Dan will call and greet you with a personalized haiku , limerick, or just plain tacky one-liner of your choice.
       So, act now-operators are standing by!!

      
     Be one of the first 50 callers to order this priceless service, and you'll receive a free Dan Rodricks autographed photo (suitable for framing-frames extra), a Dan Rodricks beer cozie, and a Dan Rodricks plastic letter opener (guaranteed not to mangle your mail until, let's say, the 4th or 5th envelope you try to open)! "

Heck, you could even do ringtones!?
"Ring, Ring- Hey, this is Dan here. I know you're kinda' busy- barreling down 795, sipping your low-fat latte, while applying your mascara, and all- but, your mother-in-law is calling. Shall we take it?!?"

I'm telling you, brother, it could be big!

Besides, who needs Dave Cordish, anyhow?!

Matt from Baltimore County

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 3:04 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Stephen Hunter's Success

Props to old friend Steve Hunter (Stephen Hunter in his prolific by-line), former Sun film critic, whose novel, "Point of Impact," is the basis for The Shooter (Paramount, opening March 16) directed by Antoine Fuqua and starring Mark Wahlberg as exiled military marksman Bob Lee Swagger suspected in an assassination plot. We were all pretty bummed out around here when Hunter went to the Washington Post as its film critic. He won the Pulitzer prize there in 2003, long overdue, in my opinion; he could have easily won that award a couple of times while reviewing films on Calvert Street. He is a world-class writer, and most of us who have worked in journalism in this region during the last 25 years have been in awe of his talent and productivity. Good for him. Point of Impact is just one of a few Hunter novels -- The Day Before Midnight and The Master Sniper, for instance -- that should have been turned into film long ago. Sorry Lopez, another FOH, isn't here to see this -- and to review the film!

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:36 AM | | Comments (0)
        

March 7, 2007

Wimpy Winter Weather

No school today around Baltimore? What's up with that? This is fluffy stuff, and not much of it. I haven't weighed in on Baltimore's delicate condition -- it's snowanoia -- in a long time. Why? Because it's something we're all too well aware of by now. At the mere rumor of snow, we're canceling everything. As I write this, the dusting is all but finished and the kids are home hangin' out, another day of classes lost. My friend Frank Roylance, over at the Weather Blog, thinks the school systems got this one right. I disagree. A two-hour delay would have made more sense. At this rate, kids are going to be in school in late June. All right. I'm done. 'Snuff said. Forget I said anything.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 12:48 PM | | Comments (2)
        

March 6, 2007

Hot Stove Fishin'

Too cold to go fishin' yet, and there's snow on the way. SWinter seemed to get longer today, didn't it? In searching through computer files, I came across something I'd written a few years ago, after a fishing trip with two older friends, former Evening Sun outdoors writer Bill Burton and Calvert Bregel. This short story takes me to a warmer day several years ago, when the three of us made a trip to Burton's hometown in Vermont.

A Big New England Breakfast

We were up in Vermont, a nice weekend trip arranged by Bill Burton and hosted by his dear aunt and uncle, two people who appeared to have come up an inch short for selection as the ma-and-pa models for “American Gothic” and found happy second place in a Norman Rockwell narrative. This put us in a fine old colonial home in Arlington, Rockwell’s old town and one of the towns through which meanders the Battenkill.

The idea was to do some fly-fishing in the Battenkill, the unstated goal of that being the hooking of the famous river’s brown trout. We were to sleep and take our meals in the home of Bill’s elderly relatives, pleasant and practical New Englanders who kept a firm daily schedule.

Saturday breakfast, for instance, was to be 8:30 a.m. Sharp.

“Oh, no, Burton, do we have to have breakfast?” Calvert asked as we drove to the river at 7 a.m.

“Yes,” Burton said. “Aunt Mimi wants to make us a big breakfast.”

“But I want to do some fishing,” Calvert said, betraying slight annoyance at having to start fishing, then stop to sit in a house with too many doilies and eat what would certainly be a too-long breakfast. It was the typical kind of old-friends grousing that went on between Calvert and Bill on fishing trips.

“I don’t want to seem ungracious, but my goodness, Burton, we came here to do some fishing and we haven’t caught anything yet.”

“I have,” I said from the back seat of Calvert’s Explorer, as he pulled into a parking space by the bridge.
“When we weren’t looking, you did,” Calvert said. “Burton, do we have to have breakfast?”
“Indulge me, Bregel. Just go along with it, will you?”

It was an exquisite morning, the early sunlight on the foliage, and the slightest chill in the air. Calvert pulled on his waders, and set up his fly rod and tied on a fly I had suggested – a beadhead nymph. This process – the donning of waders, the assembling of the rod, the threading of its eyes with the line, the attaching to that fly line the proper monofilament leader and to that the nymph imitation – took close to 25 minutes.

It was 7:30 before Calvert actually stepped into the Battenkill.
Another five minutes before, on his second or third cast, he lost his nymph in an overhead tree.
Another five minutes passed before I could get to him and tie on another fly for him.
In the next 30 minutes nothing of consequence occurred. No fish were hooked.

“Beautiful morning,” Calvert said, always appreciative of the beauty of the natural world around him.

Just then a young woman appeared, as if from nowhere. She was in her 20s, extremely attractive, with dark brown hair tied in a ponytail. She wore waders and a fishing vest, and she clutched a clipboard.
“Well now, Dan,” Calvert said. “Will you look at that?”
“I’m looking, Calvert.”

The young woman drew closer. Calvert’s eyes went on red alert.
“How are you gentlemen doing?” she called from the high stream bank.
“You must have us mistaken for someone else,” Calvert said, and the young woman laughed.
“I’m doing a creel survey for the state of Vermont Department of Fisheries Management,” she said, “And I’d like to ask you a few questions. May I approach?”
“Please do,” Calvert said, winking at me, reaching for her and helping the young woman down the stream bank into the water. “You stand right here and ask me your questions, my dear.”

It was obvious by now that Calvert Bregel, outdoorsman and ladies’ man, was in the hunt. What I heard from a distance of about 20 feet was Calvert asking the young woman twice as many questions as she asked him, and from the corner of my eye it became increasingly obvious that Calvert was quite taken with her and she quite charmed by Calvert.

I continued fishing without success, watching and listening to a master at work in the next pool, admiring his craft, his way with words.
Calvert had just arrived at important questions – “Do you live far from here?” “What time do you finish work?” – when Bill Burton could be heard calling – first from a distance, then through the bushes directly behind us.

“Bregel! Time for breakfast!”

Burton’s cry stopped Calvert in midsentence.
“Come on, Bregel, Aunt Mimi’s waiting.”

Calvert was crestfallen. It was time to leave the river, remove the bulky waders and head back to the house for the big New England breakfast. But Calvert had not completed his mission. He had not caught a fish nor had he sufficient time to work his magic on the young woman. She hadn’t given him her phone number.

The words,  “Aunt Mimi’s waiting” seemed to be her cue to evacuate.

We returned back to the house near the center of Arlington. Calvert sat across from me at an elegantly set dining room table. Breakfast was large and delicious. But poor Calvert. I’ve never seen a fellow more wistful as he sat through a meal, slowly chewing Aunt Mimi’s French toast, and day-dreaming of the one that got away.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 5:50 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Baltimore's Unfinished Business

Speech delivered at Friends School, Baltimore, convocation, March 2:

There are challenges and there are solutions to Baltimore’s problems, and I can tell you personally that there is nothing more satisfying to the human soul than being part of the solution to problems that afflict our fellow citizens.
Bs_md_rodricksdrugs_kirschb_1 I have by now written more than 4,500 columns and news stories, feature stories and book reviews for The Baltimore Sun. The column I wrote on June 8, 2005, might have been the most effective one.

By June 8, 2005, I had written hundreds of columns about what might generally be described as Baltimore problems – homelessness, the deaths of children in rowhouse fires, homicides related to drug dealing, the numbing number of drug addicts (one in 10, or one in every 15 citizens, depending on what estimate you believe), and the lack of funding for drug treatment; the city’s nation-leading loss of population, the need for housing for the poor, the need for stronger, smarter leadership in city government.

By June 8, 2005, I and other Baltimoreans had experienced five years of optimism and a lot of good news about our city – modest improvements in student test scores in the public elementary schools, new housing and construction all over town, a leveling off in the city’s population decline, the redevelopment of the west side near the restored Hippodrome theater and University of Maryland Hospital, redevelopment on the east side near Johns Hopkins Hospital, a promising decrease in the overall crime rate and, for the first time in a decade, an annual homicide rate below 300.

But on June 8, as I set about to write yet another column, as I looked at the Baltimore scene to find a subject, I noted these news stories: Violent crime in Baltimore increased in 2004 for the first time since 1999, according to new FBI statistics. Across the country, violent crime decreased 1.7 percent from 2003 to 2004. In Baltimore, violent crime climbed 4.3 percent, and ours remained one of the country's deadliest cities. There was one killing for about every 6,500 residents in Chicago, and one killing for about every 14,550 residents in New York. In Baltimore, there was one killing for about every 2,350 residents.

And this, mind you, was still an improvement over where we had been under a different mayor and police commissioner all through the 1990s.
There were other items in the news that caught my eye.

One, about a family tragedy in Northwest Baltimore, was by a fellow Sun writer and reported this: “Since Jan. 1, 2002, 913 people had been killed in Baltimore. Three of them were Annie Dozier's only sons.”
And there was this: “Two men died, and another was in critical condition, after three apparently unrelated shootings reported in a four-hour period on June 7. The bloodshed continued last night as a double shooting was reported about 9:30 p.m. Police said two unidentified men were shot in the 2700 block of Tivoly Ave.”
– All of that combined for a perfect storm in my mind.

So on June 8, as I set about to write yet another column, I was thinking as a journalist and as a citizen: Why not just ask them to stop? Why not say what we’ve wanted to say all along – will you please stop killing each other and killing our city?
That’s what I did. And I offered to help drug dealers find jobs and get off the corners, and I published my phone number: 410-332-6166.

The phone has pretty much not stopped ringing at my desk since 4:40 am on June 9, 2005. The Sun outfitted me with a cell phone just so I could receive and return phone calls all day, anywhere, at any time. 
I don’t have a staff tracking my calls and results – so I will have to go with estimates. Since June 9, 2005, my contacts with people in “the life” number at least 4,000 and is probably pushing toward 4,500. I am talking about men and women, as young as 18 and as old as 56, who have either used or sold heroin and/or cocaine, or who have used and sold those drugs to maintain their habits.

They are in various stages of trouble or recovery – some are sill using drugs, some are in treatment, some are still selling; many have stopped selling because they fear more incarceration or harm, and death, on the street. Many are older, 35 to 45, in recovery, out of prison within the last 24 months, unemployed, or underemployed, and all complain that their criminal records – in the main, non-violent and limited to narcotics charges – are obstacles to steady jobs.

Rather than push dope for $50 a day, they said they wanted a real job. They wanted out of the game because they were too old, too burned out for another prison stint, too fearful of the police and the competition, too embarrassed to face their families. They wanted economic self-reliance in a way that would not land them in the jail or morgue.

Contrary to our impressions, far from all of the people in the life want to stay in the life.
In one telephone conversation after another, enough to fill a stack of legal pads, I heard from guys looking for a way out. Real people. Not people from a frictional television show set in Baltimore. Real people. Here’s what some of them said:

"People think we [sell drugs] to just come outside and be tough or hard. We do it to survive. Right now, there isn't much food in my mother's house."
  "I have four children. I got to find some way to help with my family."
   "It's time for me to step up to the plate and show our young ones that [drug dealing] ain't cool anymore. And one time before I leave this world I want to hear my mother say she's proud of me, instead of shakin' her head and asking, 'Why you keep selling that poison to your people?'"

For the first time in my career, I wrote to drug dealers and drug addicts, not about them.
I think that was what made the difference.
People who had felt abandoned – or never really part of the mainstream at all – now had a name and a phone number to call, if they wanted some help. All I did was connect people to the information they needed to get on track for something better. I think I built a bridge between one Baltimore and the other Baltimore – that other Baltimore of drugs, crime, high rates of unemployment and family dysfunction and low expectations -- in a way that had not been tried in my profession before.

Some who called for help found jobs with private businesses. Some found work through Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake or entered a job training program. I have referred dozens and dozens of others to job leads and two other Baltimore programs aimed at helping the ex-offender. It wasn't hard to do. It just took time. Guys now call me to give me about job leads. A dozen people from the life enrolled in and have since graduated from a culinary training class.
But this is a complex problem, in Baltimore.
We tried to arrest our way out of the heroin-and-cocaine epidemic for more than 20 years. We filled the old prisons, built new prisons and filled those.

Maryland's prison population has doubled since 1984.

Between 1925 and 1970, the number of men and women incarcerated in the United States averaged about 200,000 per year. Since 1971, the incarceration numbers have risen steadily and significantly. By 2004, we had 2.4 million behind bars, mostly due to the war on drugs.

We took corrections out of corrections, warehoused inmates, and only recognized the need for public funding of drug treatment in recent years. We sent thousands upon thousands of men and women home from prison vulnerable to relapse and unprepared for straight time. We continue to make it difficult for even non-violent offenders to find jobs, and we have a recidivism rate of more than 50 percent.<
Any citizen -- Republican or Democrat or Green, black or white  -- should see the need for a major repair here.<
I wrote that column last June 9 because I was sick of all this.
Sick of the waste of human life.
Sick of the cycle.
Sick of drug addicts breaking into our cars and homes, shoplifting in our stores, prostituting themselves, and neglecting their children.
Sick of paying nearly $25,000 per inmate annually, only to have half of them return to prison within three years of release.

What we need is drug treatment on demand.
We have a fierce human problem in our midst - an estimated 40,000 drug
addicts, some 200,000 citizens 16 and older without jobs, between 8,000 and
9,000 men and women returning here from prison every year. Unless Maryland's - not just Baltimore's - employers recognize this long-standing crisis and make an effort to help fix it, even with a limited effort among nonviolent ex-offenders, then this city, and this region, will never hit full economic stride. We will always have in our midst men and women who merely drain government and charitable resources instead of contributing to the community's overall welfare by working, supporting their children and owning homes.

We need to change profoundly the corrections systems and make it, from start to finish, comprehensively rehabilitative.
We need public leadership on the cause of the ex-offender – taken directly and loudly and clearly to the business community -- a stated official belief in the concept of redemption and second chances.

We need a sustained effort to build better communities by breaking the drug-fueled cycle of crime-incarceration-unemployment-crime. It’s one of the great and exciting challenges in our midst. I keep thinking what a better world this will be – better state, better city – if one half of Baltimore steps up and helps the other half. We might be the greatest city in America, instead of the greatest half-city in America.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:21 AM | | Comments (3)
        

A Stephen King thing

I know this is not the weather blog but . . . . The winds have been blowing so hard and so long now through Maryland that it's starting to feel like  something out of a Stephen King story, like "Storm of the Century" but without the snow. By the way, Storm of the Century was, I believe, King's only teleplay. Then again, I could be wrong. There might be 10 teleplays. I recently went to the "Stephen King section" of a bookstore in Virginia and was awed by the body of work. I know the guy's prolific -- remember the John Lovitz sketch on SNL, where Lovitz portrayed King as a man incessantly typing, who could conduct a live TV interview while writing his latest novel? -- but I'd really lost track of the amount of work he's produced since his close encounter with death a few years ago. Need to catch up on King this summer. That is -- if this wind doesn't blow us all to hell!

Hey Steve -- if you're reading this, how about it: A wind that blows so hard for so many days that it drives people of a Baltimore suburb mad and captures all of them in blue plastic shopping bags and lodges them in trees?

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:12 AM | | Comments (1)
        

March 5, 2007

George Bush's big toes

There was a healthy flood of e-mail on Sunday's column, with lots of inspired commentary from readers, including one named Patrick Lackey:

Your column reminded me of something I read years ago about the two political parties. Republicans want a fair race; Democrats, a fair outcome. Republicans argue that the outcome is up to the participants and none of government's business. The problem is that Republicans consider a race fair even when the starting points vary wildly for the different competitors. George W. Bush, for example, was born with both big toes an inch from the finish line. As a businessman, he couldn't find oil at a gas station. But he had enough help to survive, until finally he won. It took him an uncommonly long time to cover that inch. But the outcome was fixed. The fact that some people prevail despite lousy starting points does not mean the race is fair. It means that some people are extraordinary. We should not count on so many people being extraordinary that the nation achieves fair outcomes. Instead, we need a system that is fair to ordinary people, that is fair, in other words, to most of us.   

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 4:27 PM | | Comments (0)
        

All Ann Coulter All The Time!

CoulterThere's a lotter of chatter about Wicked Ann on this blog today. Make sure you check out reader comments that follow . . . . . .

Why do conservative groups, which supposedly want to see the GOP in charge of both the White House and the Congress again some day, keep paying Ann Coulter for her speeches and her books? You'd think they wouldn't want to be associated with the hateful juvenile rhetoric she presents as modern political standup. You'd think maybe Republicans, desiring broader political appeal throughout the country, would want to distance themselves from this act. But, despite the criticisms some Republican leaders and presidential candidates leveled against Coulter in the last couple of days because of her remarks about John Edwards, Coulter isn't going away any time soon. She'll continue to be hired as a speaker and booked as a TV commentator, and you'll continue to see her books in the Right Wing section of book stores. (This is a relatively large section of the bookstores I visit. The authors of all these liberals-hate-America books ought to get together and produce one large volume entitled something like, "Obama Rhymes With Osama: How Liberal Homo Terrorists Who Support Public Schools, Gun Control and Universal Health Insurance Are Killing Our Country And How To Stop Them.")

Don't look for boycott announcements from the American Conservative Union any time soon. This garbage works for the right-wing, having Coulter out there to utter all the incorrect and mean things that candidates can't say, and that are perceived as necessary to work the extremists into a frenzy and keep the GOP away from the mushy middle. Moderation -- compassionate conservativism, etc. --- has been pretty much left behind. His own party ate George Bush alive on his level-headed proposals for dealing with immigrants. We'll continue to hear the Coulter brand of rhetoric -- ridiculing, juvenile, divisive and wrong -- because appealing to prejudice and fear is a proven formula, and the strategists will go back to it when things look desperate. You watch. You listen. If the economy slips, if the Iraq war continues to go badly, we'll hear more of this kind of this stuff.

Then again, I'm an idealist, and an unfortunate optimist.

The country may be smartening up, as the 2006 election showed. After all, Coulter's crack about Edwards got only limited applause from that convention of Republican activists. They didn't give her a standing ovation and throw roses. Maybe we should take that as progress.

Posted by Dan Rodricks at 6:29 AM | | Comments (41)
        
Keep reading
Recent entries
Archives
Categories
About Dan Rodricks
Jan. 8, 2009, marked 30 years for Dan Rodricks' column in The Baltimore Sun. Over three decades, Dan has won numerous regional and several national awards for his reporting and commentary -- in print and on the air. "I've had opportunity to write a column and work in both radio and television, never having to leave my adopted hometown of Baltimore to have those experiences," he says. "I consider myself very fortunate." In addition to writing a twice-weekly column for The Baltimore Sun and his Random Rodricks blog, Dan is currently the host of Midday, on WYPR-FM, National Public Radio in Baltimore. An artful story-teller and social critic, he has observed local, state and national political and cultural trends for three decades, and has a lot to say about almost everything.
More on Dan Rodricks
Dan's Facebook page


Midday with Dan Rodricks
Follow @middayrodricks on Twitter
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Dan Rodricks' columns
Recent columns Rodricks talks about his column on NPR
Dear drug dealers
Dan Rodricks' campaign to help Baltimore residents "get out of the game."
Most Recent Comments
Blog updates
Recent updates to baltimoresun.com news blogs
 Subscribe to this feed