The Empty President
The President and the White House pulled up a few chairs yesterday and held a conference on school safety in the wake of Nickel Mines and two other recent nightmares, and the event was as superficial as most Americans probably expected it to be. It was a big discussion group that never discussed guns, and the President pretty much dismissed any major role for the federal government in school safety: "It's really important that people not think government is a loving entity. Government is law and justice."
Whatever. This event was as empty as this administration. They don't know how to resolve the bloody Iraq mess they created. They don't know how to get spending under control and deficits reduced. They can't solve illegal immigration issues even with Republican majorities in Congress. And all they can do on school safety is assemble a discussion group that never discusses guns.
It's not just President Empty. The nation continues to suffer from outbursts of violence on school campuses and the frequent use of handguns and other firearms in the commissions of homicides, and no one in leadership even approaches the subject of gun control anymore for fear of unleashing the wrath of the NRA. In the aftermath of the Amish killings, discussions about the out-of-control numbers of guns in our culture has been muted (except in this space!)
The only politician I've heard raise the issue was the one in Wisconsin who wants to arm school teachers.
The battle over guns is over; we live in a violent nation, armed to its teeth. There's no getting over it. There's just getting used to it. And I think we're already there.


Comments
There are many things that I think the administration is doing wrong. I think the president should have resigned years ago. But one thing this administration is right about is that gun control is useless for preventing crimes. As cliche as it may sound to you, gun control only takes guns away from the law abiding. And most gun crimes (I think around 75%, http://www.peaceathome.org/pdfs/homrepo.pdf table 11)
are committed by people with past criminal records. High profile school shootings by milkmen with no criminal records are anomalies, that is why they make news. Policy should not be based on emotional responses to rare events. School shootings are so rare that a presidential meeting on school violence was unnecessary in the first place. I'm glad there were no knee-jerk, tearful rants for more gun control.
Gun control assumes that all people are criminals, or potential criminals. If this doesn't insult the notion of "innocent until proven guilty" then you are not thinking rationally.
"Don't sell guns to criminals?" Yes, good idea.
"Restrict gun sales to law abiding citizens?" No, that violates basic human rights.
Posted by: Dan | October 11, 2006 11:06 AM
Japan has no guns, and alothugh a few criminals do have them, there are like 2 murders a year in Japan.
Guns control laws vary widely, but there is NO sane reason why school teachers need guns.
Posted by: Lets give kids GUNS | October 11, 2006 12:05 PM
Why can't we do something about the relatively small number of gun sellers who are responsibility for so many of the guns used in crimes? It's something how this so touch on crime country is so permissive regarding guns.
Posted by: mike g | October 12, 2006 12:02 AM