Ehrlich and Dumb Growth
In the debate that will air tomorrow night, Governor Ehrlich claims not to know what Martin O'Malley is talking about when the mayor says this:
"How costly is it for the mom and dad who spend more time in traffic on I-270 each day than they do with their kids? If we don't start making better investments in transportation to benefit the whole state including Western Maryland and the Eastern Shore, the future growth that is coming is going to determine Maryland's character rather than Maryland's character determining future growth."
Says the dismissive Ehrlich: "I don't understand what that means."
I'll tell you what it means, governor. It means if we don't manage how we develop the land and plan roads as Maryland's population grows, Maryland's character will be forever changed, and not for the better. We're going to have one sprawling mess on our hands.
It's not hard to understand. There's a reason why Maryland established critical areas around the bay for protection. There's a reason why, in most opinion surveys, Marylanders say they want development to slow down and for Smart Growth principles to prevail.
Of course, we shouldn't be terribly surprised by Ehrlich's attitude. He abolished the state's Smart Growth office and, in recent months, during a major test of both critical areas and Smart Growth principles, the governor took a walk . . . . He took no position on the Blackwater Resort project near the Blackwater Wildlife Refuge and Cambridge. Fortunately, Maryland's Critical Areas Commission said no to such dumb growth. At least someone in state government understood what was at stake.







Comments
For a real analysis of the blackwater project see:
http://www.diamondbackonline.com/media/storage/paper873/news/2006/10/12/Opinion/Blackwater.Triumph-2345110.shtml
Posted by: David Daddio | October 15, 2006 8:57 PM
Remember, Mr. Ehrlich's campaign is lubricated with the money from developers that want to sprawl out to the Susquehanna and Frederick ... with Chick-Fil-A's and ExxonMobil's every couple miles.
It's the only thing they know.
Posted by: J.A. | October 16, 2006 12:32 AM
The Blackwater project was indeed dumb. But many "official" smart growth projects are not much better. State and local governments need to attract family-wage jobs to where people already live so that residents can walk or bike to their jobs. I'm all for preserving rural Maryland. But I am not in favor of taking the new residents that Maryland is "supposed" to have and pack them into new extreme-urban centers in otherwise nice suburban communities (like mine) where the majority of residents don't want the growth, thank you. Developers will just keep getting the state to build new mass transit or highways (like the intercounty connector) so that they can build more "smart-growth" cities. What's the end game? How many people are we going to stuff into our region? I did't move to Greenbelt to have it changed into a high-density, urban waste-land. When are state and local officials going to manage land use for the benefit of the majority of CURRENT residents? See www.ControlGrowth.org for more information about growth issues.
Posted by: Bob Fireovid | October 16, 2006 4:11 PM