Conaway suit could "chill free speech in Baltimore," blogger says
Blogger Adam Meister has asked a judge to dismiss the $21 million law suit that Baltimore City Councilwoman Belinda Conaway brought against him after he reported she signed documents indicating she lived in Baltimore County.
The suit "if allowed to proceed, will chill free speech in Baltimore," an attorney for Meister wrote in a motion asking the judge to dismiss the suit. "By filing this suit, [Conaway] is attempting to silence Mr. Meister during the period of her re-election campaign."
In March, Meister,on his blog for Examiner.com, reported that Conaway had designated a home in Randallstown as her principal residence and linked to public real estate records to back his case.
"Belinda K. Conaway should immediately resign from Baltimore's City Council since she does not reside in Baltimore," Meister wrote.
Last month, Conaway filed suit against Meister demanding $21 million in damages and saying the blog post was libeous, defamatory and intentionally inflicted of emotional distress.
Conaway says in the suit that she was "having trouble sleeping," "short-tempered and ill" because of the blog post.
Meister's legal filings, prepared by two attorneys from the Venable firm on a pro bono basis, states that Conaway is a public figure and Meister was reporting on a matter of public concern-- indicating that his words do not pass the test to be considered libel.
Moreover, the filings state, Meister linked to documents Conaway herself had signed, attesting that her primary residence as in the county.
"If politicians can punish journalists by dragging them into litigation for reporting on the
politicians’ own statements, on matters of public concern, then the First Amendment is
endangered in Baltimore," Meister states in the suit.
An attorney for Conaway, Thomas J. Maronick Jr. said he had not yet had time to thoroughly studying Meister's filings, but said, "Obviously, at this point, we intend to vigorously argue against that motion."
"We don't believe our suit is frivolous," he said. "We filed it in good faith."








Comments
The Streisand effect :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Posted by: Dave T | June 23, 2011 10:50 AM
Good for you Adam! Keep up the fight against this crooked politician and the rest of them that you are blogging about. Someone has to do something to make these politicians follow the laws and ethics that go with their office. They certainly have proven that they won't police themselves!
Posted by: Mike | June 23, 2011 11:05 AM
Also known as the "Dan Snyder" effect.
http://gawker.com/5795741/dan-snyder-will-never-shut-up
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford | June 23, 2011 11:08 AM
What I don't understand is why the Sun only seems to be covering the portion of this story as it pertains to this libel suit.
If Councilwoman Conaway's tax documents are true, she needs to resign from office or be forced from office. If they are not true, then she is guitly of repeated tax fraud. Either one of these should be grounds for her removal from the city council. I find it difficult to believe that this was simply an error on the part of Ms. Conaway. Either way she is guilty of something and should be removed from office. This is not a matter of inappropriate conduct but of actual criminal malfeasance. Have our standards dropped so precipitously as to allow our elected officials to commit crimes and remain in office? I fear they have.
Where is the City Inspector General in all of this? Are they investigating her residency status OR her tax fraud? Will the Sun please ask these questions?
Posted by: bryanintowson | June 23, 2011 11:08 AM
Sadly Ms. Conaway should realize by suing him she is giving him and his ghost-town like blog much more attention than it ever would have gotten in the 1st place. (I thought Adam's 5 seconds of fame ended with the Zack Sowers story)
It reminds me of the Redskins owner suing the DC city paper about an article listing the mistakes make by his ownership. Now instead of MAYBE 100,000 local readers the thing in on ESPN being read (and laughed at) by the entire nation.
Conaway should learn to choose her battles. I'm not fan of Adam Meister but I have to side with him on this.
Posted by: Billick | June 23, 2011 11:13 AM
Agree, why is the Sun, or for that matter the IG not investigating this?
Posted by: Jason | June 23, 2011 11:29 AM
@bryanintowson There was an article in the Sun recently that discussed the legal implications of this. Apparently the laws pertaining to where city representatives need to live (which are state laws, for some reason) aren't entirely clear. Apparently the term used is that the rep must be "domiciled" in his or her district, which some lawyers believe doesn't mean the same thing as "primary residence for tax purposes." Basically, if you can show that you have an address that you have an association with and where you stay sometimes (as Conaway does with her family's home), you can argue that you're domiciled there., even if your primary residence for tax purposes is elsewhere. I'm sure that Conaway is registered to vote at her father's address, which is probably the main thing under consideration here.
I totally agree that it seems sleazy, and the laws need to be clarified. I also think Conaway's reaction has been completely insane.
Posted by: jfruh | June 23, 2011 11:53 AM
@jfruh
Agree with your statement about the state laws, etc. I still just do not understand how you can claim a place as your primary residence for taxes and the not live there. Like I said - that to me would seem like tax fraud.
I just wish she had gone on Channel 2 and spazzed out like Jack Young did when they accused him of not living in the City. I mean I know I'd love to have a "vacation home" in Edgewood.
In any event it appears that a number of coucil members are highly ethically challenged and there seems to be no abatement to this disease.
Posted by: bryanintowson | June 23, 2011 1:00 PM
@jfruh - By Conaway refusing to admit that she lives in Baltimore County, she has opened herself up to perjury and tax fraud. She's trying to have it both ways and claiming that the perjury didn't happen - that it was an honest oversight. I find that very hard to believe.
The Conaways are a bunch of liars and crooks. It's time for them to go.
Posted by: fhr | June 23, 2011 1:11 PM
I agree 100% with Billick. Conaway did herself no favors by suing Adam Meister. Adam thrives on attention- from the time that he got the Baltimore City Paper to cover his crass "Diaper Day" taunting of Cleveland Browns fans at M&T Bank Stadium to exploiting the Zach Sowers tragedy for his own political gain. Now, when Adam emerges victorious in this case (as he should), Adam will try to make himself out to be the second coming of Peter Zenger. Thanks Belinda.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford | June 23, 2011 1:13 PM
jfruh - That about sums it up. The Conaways are such awful people. Hopefully the $21M suit will SLAPP Belinda in the face. She has now brought all of this attention to herself and Adam. Anyone with half a brain is siding with Adam. She is exposted for what she is,,,,,,
Posted by: meme | June 23, 2011 1:33 PM
I can't read Meister, because his prose has the unfortunate effect of making him sound unbearably smug, but that doesn't mean he should be silenced by some bullying misuse of the courts.
And he certainly seems to have the right end of things on this Conaway business. Public office in Baltimore was not instituted to provide a living for the Conaway family (or the Currans, or the…well, you get the idea). The sooner we realize this as a city, the better.
Posted by: Cheap Jim | June 23, 2011 3:12 PM
@Cheap Jim - oh god I couldn't agree more with you, his stuff on Charm City Current in barely comprehensible. It's often just a collection of links and incomplete sentences with no traffic or discussion to speak of.
Posted by: Billick | June 23, 2011 4:52 PM
The truth is not very popular Belinda!
Posted by: john | June 23, 2011 6:22 PM
Maronick: "We don't believe our suit is frivolous."
A $21 million lawsuit because a blogger used a poltician's own sworn statements to claim that the politician lives in another jurisdiction? Is this guy for real? Just how stupid does Maronick think we are?
Posted by: fhr | June 24, 2011 12:21 AM
@fhr - he obviously thinks everyone in Baltimore City is pretty stupid.
And I might as well given who gets elected time after time.
Posted by: bryanintowson | June 24, 2011 9:28 AM
The *simplest* solution to this problem is to not vote for her come election time. A lawsuit / investigation will merely create a long, stupid, yawn inducing crapfest unworthy of coverage or commentary.
STOP VOTING FOR THESE PEOPLE.
Posted by: Evan | June 24, 2011 2:57 PM