Assembly ships wine shipping toward governor
The Senate has joined the House of Delegates in passing a proposal that enables wineries to ship bottles directly to Maryland homes.
All 45 senators who voted on the shipping bill gave it the green light.(Sen. J.B. Jennings is away at flight training and Sen. Ulysses Currie did not vote.)
Gov. Martin O'Malley has said he would sign the legislation. That's the only major step remaining, though procedural legislative votes remain. The legislation would take effect July 1, in time for late summer wine sipping.
After years of disputes about whether Maryland should join 37 other states and the District of Columbia in allowing wine shipping, the alcohol industry, consumers and lawmakers this year struck a compromise. The House passed the bill nearly unanimously on Saturday.
Wineries can pay a $200 annual fee to ship to Marylanders. Residents can receive up to 18 cases per year. Retailers, including those who feature "wine of the month" clubs, may not ship to Maryland homes. Only about a dozen states allow retailer shipping.
Categories: 2011 legislative session




Comments
Only took 11 years.
Posted by: Robert Davis | March 29, 2011 7:26 AM
So, even though this bill will pass, unless the winery I want to buy from is willing to pay Maryland $200, my $720 case order will never make it here?
Why not ask if the consumer would be willing to pay the liquor tax. Small boutique wineries are not going to be willing to pay the $200 fee per year.
Posted by: Dave Greger | March 29, 2011 8:04 AM
Thank goodness! It never made sense for Maryland to restrict shipping of wine. The arguments about teen drinking, hurtful competition and tax revenues never made any sense. It was the powerful liquor wholesalers who kept the stranglehold on this sensible idea of direct shipment for years.
Next stop: retailer shipping. If consumers can order books and shoes online, in competition with small family-owned Maryland book stores and shoe stores, why can't we do the same with wine?
Posted by: Marc Lieber | March 29, 2011 8:46 AM
So how does this law effect personal shipping of wine from out of state? If I buy a wine in Oregon, will I be able to ship it to Maryland legally ?
Posted by: Steve | March 29, 2011 9:38 AM
Thanks to the Maryland General Assembly for continuing to put restrictions on the purchase of wine by Marylanders.
Marylanders certainly wouldn't want wineries or retailers to ship their wines freely to us consumers without additional fees. Our state government never passes on an opportunity to make it difficult for businesses to operate by using fees and regulations. And us consumers really are thankful for protection from making free choices by our state government.
I guess the state thinks we should be happy that the legislators and governor finally allowed us to get wine shipped to us at all. But would it be too much to ask for wines to be shipped to Marylanders without the state being involved?
Maryland - the land of pleasant taxation and regulation!
Posted by: Dave | March 29, 2011 9:56 AM
I joined a wine club at Keswick Vineyards in Charlottesville this weekend. I gave them my work address in DC for shipping, thinking I could change it to my home address when this bill is in effect. Now I have to wait and see if they are willing to pay Maryland for the right to ship the product that I've purchased?
yeah. That makes sense.
Posted by: Summer | March 29, 2011 11:18 AM
I wonder what the cost of shipping will be on a bottle of wine? $10? The two hundred dollar fee ensures that you are charged 6% sales tax and the new 1% alcohol tax.
Did you really think this was for the wine purchasers? This was for the wineries in Md.
Posted by: befuddled | March 29, 2011 11:48 AM
This bill is certainly not perfect (retailers should have been included) but the license fee, sales tax and excise tax payments by wineries is pretty much standard across the country. Maryland wineries can currently ship to almost every state that allows shipping - if they are willing to buy that state's shipping license. Unless you have enough demand it doesn't make sense to buy one. There is also no question that Maryland was losing revenue to people shipping to neighboring jurisdictions (like VA, where the taxes would get paid there) or shipped illegally into Maryland.
However, I suspect that California wineries (for example) that are already shipping to states on the East Coast will add Maryland - the demographics are compelling.
Posted by: Morris | March 29, 2011 1:26 PM
I work for a small Napa Valley winery and it will definitely pay the $200 to add Maryland. Our wines are all handcrafted and we have been waiting for the opportunity to ship them to your state. If you have any interest in marketing these wines, contact me for more information at wine.sandy@yahoo.com.
Posted by: Sandy Irving | March 30, 2011 8:40 AM
This is a step up...a step up from the ridiculous to the absurd...what is the argument for not being able to buy from out-of-state retailers?? I would imagine it's the fear of not being able to get a fee on alchohol sold...but...at least I have an out...I'll just continue to get my wine shipped to a friend in WV...or take a short trip to DC...ha! It's absurd...'cause the vast majority of alcohol is beer and liqour...not wine...and I'd buy 95% of my wine locally BUT I'd love to have the option of buying wine I can't find outside of MD. Just absurd.
Posted by: Bubba | April 2, 2011 12:42 PM
Government of, by, and for the special interests still prevail in Marland!
Posted by: T.Kotula | April 9, 2011 9:19 PM
Government of, by, and for the special interests still prevail in Marland!
Posted by: T.Kotula | April 10, 2011 5:23 PM
This is about as good as no law at all. I don't want to order wine from wineries. I want to be able to have wine shipped from retailers in other states. I want to have my Zagat wine club shipments sent to me instead of to my friends in Virginia.
Posted by: Karen Rayne | April 12, 2011 3:22 PM
what passed is worse than passing nothing. It will make me NOT ship to my home. I'll send to my DC work address!
Bless the knuckleheads that represent the people of Maryland. So many special interests nothing gets done.
Posted by: Don Platt | April 16, 2011 5:46 PM
How is this worse than no bill? For those who want to buy wines available only by mailing list from out-of-state wineries, this is a huge plus. $200 is peanuts for a winery with mulitple MD customers who each spend multiples of that amount each year.
Sure, it's still not possible for retailers to import, and that's still a major pain but it's no worse than before.
Posted by: Tannin Pig | April 18, 2011 8:22 PM
I don't like wine much, but I have not tried much. I want to though. It always cheesed me off that I couldn't try different wines. I had to choose from a POS liquor store with a vast 1 isle to choose from. I think this is a good step (I can't believe MD is doing it at the same time they are making cigar shipping illegal).
Posted by: vm | May 16, 2011 1:49 PM
ZAGAT Wine Club ships to: AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, IA, ID, IL, IN, LA, MA, MI, MN, MO, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OR, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WI, WV, WY and DC.
A majority of states (32) + DC
Posted by: Mick munoz | September 9, 2011 4:32 PM