On the Tea Party and change
At Hillcrest Elementary School in Catonsville, Jeff Morsberger, former co-owner of a tavern in town, said he was looking for change in this election. “We’ve got to do something. Things have stayed the same too long.” He wouldn’t say which candidates got his votes, but he was looking for new blood “from the top to the bottom” of the ballot. He does not consider himself a Tea Party member, just someone looking for change.
Other voters echoed that theme.
Kevin Taylor, a vice principal at Towson High School, says he’s a Democrat but is not terribly enthusiastic about any of the party’s candidates. “I feel like all the candidates say the same thing, with very little difference.”
He noted that he’d been besieged with mailings, phone calls and other campaign appeals, but added: “I wasn’t super-excited about anybody, in particular….They say the same things, but don’t always get things accomplished. They don’t follow through on their promises.”
Robert Crowell, a salesman for Sylvania, is a Democrat, too, but he detects more enthusiasm among GOP candidates and supporters. He’s looking for more change, he says, because “we’re coming out of a lost decade.” And though he voted for Gov. Martin O’Malley, he said he wouldn’t be too upset if former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich won in November.
Even loyal O’Malley supporter Nicole Ames, the marketing director for a local law firm, said, “My mind is open.” Still, she expected to continue supporting the governor “unless something very odd happens.’’ She said she likes O'Malley because he’s “tough when he needs to be.”








Comments
This is my analogy for the teaparty: A dog chasing a car, even if it catches it it won't know what to do with it.
When you study the history of upstart political movements that exist, or at least pretend to exist, near the political fringes of society you see the same play repeated over and over. There are two types of candidates: 1) The political opportunists who ride the wave of anger into office and then promptly moderate back to the mean knowing they now need to keep a job; and 2) The more genuine candidate who has no idea what to really do with the power once attained and fades into background.
Take Scott Brown for example.
Posted by: HampdenJames | September 14, 2010 4:30 PM
This is my analogy for the teaparty analogy.
Nonsense !
Posted by: Anonymous | September 15, 2010 8:51 AM