baltimoresun.com

« Governor appoints sex offender advisory board | Main | Governor to address lawmakers in annual State of the State »

February 1, 2010

Lawmakers hesitant to back governor's unemployment-insurance plan

Gov. Martin O'Malley wants to give businesses a break on their skyrocketing uenmployment-benefits taxes. But -- in somewhat of an odd twist -- businesses don't seem to want the help.

That's because, as they've told lawmakers, employers fear the long-term rate increases that come with O'Malley's proposal to tap into $127 million in federal stimulus cash. They say that expanding the pool of people who can access benefits, a requirement for receiving the federal money, will cost businesses about $20 million more per year in unemployment-benefits taxes.

But, as O'Malley's aides have pointed out to lawmakers, it seems clear that expanding benefits will soon be a federal requirement anyway. Even businesses groups like the Maryland Chamber of Commerce acknowldge that. So why not go after the money now, the governor's aides argue.

Many lawmakers have told me that they feel they're in an awkward spot: They think the governor's push for the federal dollars makes sense in lots of ways, but they don't want to ignore the will of the business community ... particularly in an election year.

Sen. Thomas M. Middleton, a Democrat who heads the Senate Finance Committee, puts it this way:

"The governor is very well-intentioned on this, and I think his ideas are good and make a lot of sense," he said. "But we don't know what's best for businesses. They do. And they really don't want this."

Senator James E. DeGrange, a Democrat on the Senate's budget committee, has similar concerns. In a letter to his constituents, dated Jan. 29, he wrote:

The Governor has offered a proposal that involves a short term infusion of federal money in exchange for long term structural changes to our unemployment insurance system. The proposal would secure $127 million for short term relief, but would raise long term unemployment insurance costs by 26% for businesses. The proposed changes would cost small businesses an additional $20 million annually.

That might solve the immediate problem, but it will create serious
problems down the road. Local business owners have contacted me to
express strong opposition to this idea - and I share their concerns.
Unemployment benefits provide an important hand up to people who need
it, but raising long term costs will not solve the problem. In fact,
that would cause small businesses to lay off employees. That's the last
thing any of us want in this economy.

So what's going to happen? Middleton has had numerous meetings with O'Malley officials, business leaders and labor representatives -- in fact, I hear they're talking again tomorrow morning -- to reach some kind of compromise on the governor's proposal.

The governor's office seems committed to working something out. As Joseph Bryce, O'Malley's chief legislative officer, told me last week: "The governor's goal was to do what we can to help businesses weather through a very difficult time... As long as people are willing to keep discussing the different options, we'll keep working on it."

Stay tuned.

Posted by Julie Bykowicz at 5:26 PM | | Comments (1)
        

Comments

WHY would they choose a plan that costs more in the long run? That is just, plain, stupid!

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Headlines from The Baltimore Sun
About the bloggers
Annie Linskey covers state politics and government for The Baltimore Sun. Previously, as a City Hall reporter, she wrote about the corruption trial of Mayor Sheila Dixon and kept a close eye on city spending. Originally from Connecticut, Annie has also lived in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where she reported on war crimes tribunals and landmines. She lives in Canton.

John Fritze has covered politics and government at the local, state and federal levels for more than a decade and is now The Baltimore Sun’s Washington correspondent. He previously wrote about Congress for USA TODAY, where he led coverage of the health care overhaul debate and the 2010 election. A native of Albany, N.Y., he currently lives in Montgomery County.

Julie Scharper covers City Hall and Baltimore politics. A native of Baltimore County, she graduated from The Johns Hopkins University in 2001 and spent two years teaching in Honduras before joining The Baltimore Sun. She has followed the Amish community of Nickel Mines, Pa., in the year after a schoolhouse massacre, reported on courts and crime in Anne Arundel County, and chronicled the unique personalities and places of Baltimore City and its surrounding counties.
Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Breaking News newsletter
When a big news event breaks, we'll e-mail you the basics with links to up-to-date details.
Sign up

Blog updates
Recent updates to baltimoresun.com news blogs
 Subscribe to this feed
Charm City Current
Stay connected