baltimoresun.com

« Martin O'Malley: Buttering both the White House and Foggy Bottom sides of his bread | Main | Schaller: U.S. isn't so conservative »

December 2, 2008

Cummings whacks AIG on bonuses

Rep. Elijah Cummings kept up his fusilaide against AIG today with a letter sharply criticizing the company for continuing a "retention bonus" program for its executives even as it accepts taxpayer financed bailouts to the tune of $150 billion. Cummings had some national profile when he was head of the Congressional Black Caucus (he had enough juice and/or prescience, for example, to get a certain Senate candidate from Illinois to do a fund-raiser for the group back in 2004), but the AIG bailout has really launched him into the big time. He's getting loads of interviews on CNN and plenty of camera time grilling executives during hearings of the Joint Economic Committee.

Today's letter lets 'em have it: "...given the massive layoffs occurring at other major financial entities, such as Citibank – the American taxpayers have a right to know why senior executives at AIG, who are frankly lucky to still have jobs, need to receive additional bonus payments of any kind to retain them at AIG."

Cummings is demanding to know who's getting the bonuses, how much they're getting and where the money is coming from.

As long as the economy is in turmoil, it looks like there's no downside to populist outrage. Cummings has a good thing going, politically speaking, and it looks like he has no intention of letting up.

Full text of the letter after the jump.

Mr. Edward M. Liddy
Chief Executive Officer
American International Group, Inc.
70 Pine Street
New York, NY 10270
Dear Mr. Liddy:
I write today to request that American International Group (AIG) fully disclose to the public the extent of the payments being made to senior company executives under your employee “retention program.”  The limited information that is currently available to the public about this program is insufficient to constitute the level of disclosure that the American taxpayers, who have bailed out this firm repeatedly in recent weeks, have the right to expect.
In form 8-K dated September 22, 2008, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), AIG disclosed the following: “On September 22, 2008, a retention program of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) became effective. The program applies to approximately 130 executives and consists of cash awards payable 60 percent in December 2008 and 40 percent in December 2009.”
AIG has recently indicated that it will not provide performance bonuses in 2008.  However, in what appears to be a disingenuous “slight of hand,” AIG has announced its intention to continue to provide the retention program payments (commonly known as retention bonuses) previously announced in September – albeit some executives have apparently opted to delay receipt of these payments (but not to forgo them).  Thus, in form 8-K dated November 24, 2008, and filed with the SEC, AIG disclosed the following: “On November 24, 2008, the Executive Officers of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) who participate in its previously disclosed retention program, including Chief Financial Officer David Herzog and Executive Vice President Jay Wintrob, volunteered to delay payments thereunder, with the first installment being delayed from December 2008 until April 2009 and the second installment being delayed from December 2009 until April 2010. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Edward M. Liddy does not participate in this program.”
In September of this year (and several days prior to the SEC filing announcing the “retention program”), the U.S. taxpayers provided a bailout loan of $85 billion to keep AIG afloat; in return, the federal government received an ownership stake in the firm.  Subsequent actions increased the total size of the bailout to more than $150 billion – and restructured some of the initial loans provided to the firm.  Without taxpayer intervention, AIG would have ceased to exist and, to be blunt, all of its employees would have lost their jobs.
Against this background – and given the massive layoffs occurring at other major financial entities, such as Citibank – the American taxpayers have a right to know why senior executives at AIG, who are frankly lucky to still have jobs, need to receive additional bonus payments of any kind to retain them at AIG.  To that end, I request that AIG disclose to the public the following information:
  1. Which executives in which AIG divisions are receiving the retention payments – and how much is each executive receiving?  What are the base salaries of the executives receiving the retention payments?
  2. Are all executives delaying receipt of these payments until April 2009 – or, if any executive is not delaying receipt of the payments, which executive or executives is/are receiving payments in December 2008 and how much is each executive receiving?
  3. Why is it necessary for any AIG executive to receive a retention payment – and why is it necessary that these be scheduled for April 2009 and April 2010?
  4. What will be the source of the retention payments provided in 2009 and 2010?
AIG has previously claimed in correspondence to me that it is working “to create a transparent, accountable culture to regain the trust of the American people.”  The disclosure of the information requested here will be a first step toward providing the kind of transparency that the American people have the right to expect from a private firm to which they have provided more than $150 billion in financial assistance.
Sincerely,
Elijah E. Cummings
Member of Congress
Posted by Andy Green at 10:11 AM | | Comments (3)
        

Comments

Awesome Job!!

The taxpayers should have never bailed out AIG. They are completely out of touch with the American people just as the three Automakers are. These bonuses are an outrage when many Americans are losing them jobs and homes. We have got to stop these bailouts.

Give me a break. Cummings "agonized" over the $700 billion bailout that the overwhelming majority of his constituents who voiced an opinion said they didn't want him to vote for, then voted for it anyway because his constituents weren't smart enough to understand what was going on, and now he wants to call shenanigans on bail out money being spent in shady ways to make himself look like a hero?

That fella has some nerve.

Then again, even after going against the will of the people on the bail out he still won re-election with 80% of the vote, so I guess his constituents really aren't smart enough to understand what's going on.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Headlines from The Baltimore Sun
About the bloggers
Annie Linskey covers state politics and government for The Baltimore Sun. Previously, as a City Hall reporter, she wrote about the corruption trial of Mayor Sheila Dixon and kept a close eye on city spending. Originally from Connecticut, Annie has also lived in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where she reported on war crimes tribunals and landmines. She lives in Canton.

John Fritze has covered politics and government at the local, state and federal levels for more than a decade and is now The Baltimore Sun’s Washington correspondent. He previously wrote about Congress for USA TODAY, where he led coverage of the health care overhaul debate and the 2010 election. A native of Albany, N.Y., he currently lives in Montgomery County.

Julie Scharper covers City Hall and Baltimore politics. A native of Baltimore County, she graduated from The Johns Hopkins University in 2001 and spent two years teaching in Honduras before joining The Baltimore Sun. She has followed the Amish community of Nickel Mines, Pa., in the year after a schoolhouse massacre, reported on courts and crime in Anne Arundel County, and chronicled the unique personalities and places of Baltimore City and its surrounding counties.
Most Recent Comments
Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Breaking News newsletter
When a big news event breaks, we'll e-mail you the basics with links to up-to-date details.
Sign up

Blog updates
Recent updates to baltimoresun.com news blogs
 Subscribe to this feed
Charm City Current
Stay connected