A journey home to the heart of our coal quandary

How often do you wonder, when you turn on the lights, where your electricity comes from? Recently, I got a closeup look at the consequences of our addiction to coal for much of our power in this part of the country. I joined a group of reporters on a trip to my home state of West Virginia to learn about the bitter feud there over mountaintop mining, and came away with much to ponder.
The field trip, organized as part of the Society of Environmental Journalists annual conference, took us first to Kayford Mountain, about 35 miles and a world away from where I grew up, in South Charleston, W.Va. My father was born in Kayford, a small mining community on Cabin Creek at the foot of the mountain, where we were told as many as 4,000 people once lived
All that remains now, though, is an abandoned brick building and a lonely white church by the road. The community was bought out by a mining company, which has proceeded to take the top off the mountain to extract its thin seams of coal.
In such mountaintop removals, after the coal is removed the excess rock and dirt is pushed down the slope, filling hollows or small valleys cut by seasonal streams.
Some residents of the area, aided by environmental groups, have protested the massive terraforming taking place, and its impact on the environment and their health. To date, the federal and state government have largely sided with the industry that the impact is negligible or acceptable - though court cases are pending. In one case, a judge found that more than 700 miles of streams in West Virginia had been buried under the debris produced by mountaintop removal.
Our bus wound its way up the mountain to a ridgetop, where we were met by Larry Gibson and Julia "Judi" Bonds, two activists opposed to mountaintop mining. Gibson refused to sell the last chunk of his ancestral family home to the company, so now has a panoramic view of the mining going on around him - a vast barren landscape denuded of trees, with giant earthmovers as small as ants in the distance. The picture above, taken by me, captures just a small portion of the disturbance. Bonds is with Coal River Mountain Watch, a group opposed to mountaintop mining.
"We went to war to find weapons of mass destruction," said Gibson, pictured at left. "All we had to do was come here." Millions of pounds of explosives have been used to blast the tops off hundreds of mountains in the state, he contends.
Gibson has a message for those listening to the presidential candidates debate energy, particularly for those touting "clean coal" as a less-polluting option.
"There is no such thing as clean coal," he insists. I know; I've been living in it all my life."
Gibson, Bonds and other protestors complain that the blasting and excavation have turned their well-water black with coal particles and have caused other, less-visible contamination. Along with the pollution has come a massive change in the natural world that they grew up with, one of foraging the surrounding forested mountain slopes for ginseng and hunting and fishing for food.
"They're destroying a mountain and a culture," said Bonds,
The mining industry, naturally, says there's another side to the story. Our group left Kayford Mountain to visit nearby Four-Mile Mine, where the mining company's executives and the head of the state mining association told us they were restoring that mountain to its original contour after extracting the coal, and planting hundreds of thousands of trees to replace the ones uprooted.
"We are practicing environmentalists,'' said Andrew Jordon, president of Pritchard Mining. "We're using the resource and then putting it (the mountain) back."
"When we leave a property, it's in better shape, environmentally," added Rodney Hackworth, the mining company's general manager. Many of the sites the company mines have been mined before, with the prior operations leaving the land unreclaimed. Jordon is at the left, and Hackworth at right, in the picture above, meeting with reporters at the mine site.
Industry advocates also argue that mining increases the supply of flat land in mountainous West Virginia, and they point out that some topped-off mountains have become building sites for schools, prisons and other development.
"We're still not as good (at reclamation) as we ought to be, but we're getting better," said William B. Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association.
Bob Dickerson, a 48-year-old miner at the Four-Mile Mine, acknowledged the human impact of the massive mining, which has bought out and uprooted whole communities like Kayford.
"You hate it that they have to go, but it's what happens in a coal mining community," he said. Many coal communities founded in the 19th century were essentially company towns where miners and their families only rented anyway.
"It's progress, simple as that," Dickerson said.
Later, a pair of Virginia Tech professors who have been studying and advising the mining industry on reclamation said the Pritchard mine was "progressive" and not typical. But even when restoring a mountain's original contour, the university experts said, mine operators are unable to put back about 20 percent of the rock and dirt they've removed, so it's deposited in the valley below.
Reclamation techniques have gotten better, said James Burger, professor of forestry and soil science at Virginia Tech, but still has degraded Appalachia's rich forests. Over the last 30 years, since mountaintop mining has been practiced in earnest, the forests have lost about half their commercial value alone, he said. The trees planted on less-rich reclaimed soil have grown only about two-thirds as fast.
The ecological impact is significant as well, contends Deborah Murray, a lawyer with the Southern Environmental Law Center. A study of a heavily mined area in southwest Virginia and eastern Tennessee found dramatic declines in the abundance of fish and freshwater mussels in mountain streams. Mussels, highly sensitive to pollution, are key indicators of water quality and stream health. Songbirds that nest in deep forests also have declined in number, Murray said. While the slopes may be replanted, she said, the birds can't wait for the trees to grow back.
I left West Virginia wondering what the future would hold - and wishing I'd seen Kayford, where my Dad was born, before it was gone.
Meanwhile, on the day of our visit to West Virginia, it was reported from Washington that the Bush administration was seeking to ease federal regulations restricting the dumping of mountaintop mining waste near rivers and streams.


Comments
Check out ILoveMountains.org (http://www.ilovemountains.org/), where you can type in your zip code to find out whether your power company is connected to mountaintop removal, and what towns they mine coal in.
Posted by: Alicia | October 29, 2008 10:03 AM
Tim, Good, provocative, balanced article. I drove home from Roanoke via the breathtakingly beautiful Blue Ridge Parkway. Not the Appalachian mountains you're writing about...but it made me wonder at the heavy price we, our children, our communities, our planet are paying. My electric company touts its wind power/green approach yet two nearby generating plants are fueled by coal from mountaintop removal.
We so often have no idea of the broad consequences of our actions - from leaving on the light to buying shrimp from Thailand. Can be mind-boggling. This is a reminder that we need to pay close attention to what we do every day --- and how we do it. For every action, there is a reaction. It's on each of us to remember that how we get our food, heat our homes, travel to work and beyond, drink our water, design our homes- it all counts. And those choices, with thought, can be positive and sustainable.
Posted by: charlotte kidd | October 29, 2008 11:34 AM
Very nice piece.
Posted by: Tim Thornton | October 29, 2008 1:20 PM