Historic climate bill gets yes vote in committee
Frank O'Donnell, an environmental activist who goes by the handle of "Clean Air Frank," noted that Presidential candidate John Edwards criticized the bill because of what he called its multi-billion dollar giveaways to coal-burning companies.
"Hillary Clinton, very shrewdly, had an amendment put up during yesterday’s committee battle that would have fixed this problem. But her amendment was defeated because of opposition led by Boxer and Lieberman (who called it a "poison pill.") Several senators -- including Cardin of Maryland and Lautenberg of New Jersey -- sat on the fence until it was clear the amendment would lose – then voted on Hillary’s side. That’s politics for you!" O'Donnel wrote.
Here is John Edwards' statement: "Addressing global warming is one of the great moral tests of our generation, and it’s time for bold action and leadership to address this crisis that threatens the globe. While I’m glad to see that global warming legislation is finally moving in the Senate, unfortunately the Lieberman-Warner bill doesn’t go far enough to address the crisis of global warming. We cannot be limited in our approach by the armies of lobbyists from big oil companies and other special interests. This bill gives away pollution permits to industry for free -- a massive corporate windfall -- instead of doing what is right and selling them so that we can use these resources to invest in clean energy research, create a new economy of green jobs, and help regular families and business go green.
I believe it is our moral obligation to do everything climate science says is needed to save our planet. Ending global warming won't be easy, but it is time to ask Americans to be patriotic about something other than war. If we start taking the bold action I have recommended, we can emerge from the crisis of global warming with an economy built on clean, renewable energy and more than one million new jobs."
Larry Schweiger, president of the National Wildlife Federation, said: "This evening’s vote marks a new era in Congress and a new approach to global warming. After years of empty promises in Congress, this evening’s victory is a sign that the leadership and political will are at hand to get the job done."
The final vote was 11-8 in favor. Maryland Sen. Cardin was one of the votes favoring the measure. The next step is for the bill to be debated on the Senate floor. No date has yet been set for that.
Doug Siglin, director of federal legislative affairs for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said: "Global climate change poses significant threats both to the health of the Chesapeake Bay and to those who live in this region. The Lieberman-Warner legislation is a significant step forward in the United States’ effort to reduce the effects of climate change and sea level rise. Increasingly, scientists are expressing concern that climate change is likely to produce severe regional weather events, cause flooding of wetlands and other low-lying areas, and make the job of restoring the Chesapeake Bay even more difficult. CBF is particularly pleased that the bill allocates a significant amount of funding derived from its emission allowance auction to states and federal agencies in the Chesapeake Bay region to help mitigate the impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife and habitats. We commend committee members John Warner (R-VA) and Ben Cardin (D-MD), for their co-sponsorship of the legislation, and look forward to working with them and other senators to further strengthen the bill as it moves through the legislative process."


Comments
yeah, Baby. Not the best proposition. It is a gret start.
good job senate
Posted by: Ronald | December 6, 2007 1:27 AM
I got a robo call from Pat Boon This morning. He thinks congress is trying to sneak it through. He wanted me to press 1 to be connected to my congressman's office(at no charge to me) and tell him to vote no.
Posted by: cheflovesbeer | December 6, 2007 12:37 PM
Dear Sheep please read 1984: You are being fooled global warming is a myth:
"In Oceania at the present day, Science, in the old sense, has almost ceased to exist. In Newspeak there is no word for 'Science.' The empirical method of thought, on which all the scientific achievements of the past were founded, is opposed to the most fundamental principles of Ingsoc." —pg 159
Posted by: TERRY | December 6, 2007 1:45 PM
Just another political power play from the opportunistic left who believe it's the job of big government to "save" us.
Thankfully that RINO John Warner's retiring.
Posted by: Speedzzter | December 6, 2007 5:29 PM